I guess I shouldn't be surprised that this thread keeps reappearing
in my inbox ;).
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrea Pescetti
...
what the result of the power function in edge cases should be.
So let me suggest a solution ... this really needs to be a per-document
setting. ...
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that this thread keeps reappearing
in my inbox ;).
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrea Pescetti
...
what the result of the power function in edge cases should be.
So let me
⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result of
0 ^ 0)
[ ... ] ANSI C, C99, ISO C++ all require that
pow(x,0) return 1 for all values of x.
[ ... ]
: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 07:08
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result
of 0 ^ 0)
[ ... ] ANSI C, C99, ISO C++ all require that
pow(x,0) return 1 for all values of x.
[ ... ]
of C 2011 also didn't seem to be under any compulsion with
regard to the C99 Rationale.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:14
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result
of 0 ^ 0)
[ ... ] I'm reading a requirement for pow(x,0) to
return 1 for all values of x. Are you seeing something else? Are you
seeing anything that says a conforming C/C++ runtime may *return
, 2013 14:08
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result of
0 ^ 0)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I earlier quoted the applicable (and only) texts from the Standards
, 2013 14:08
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result
of 0 ^ 0)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I earlier quoted the applicable (and only) texts from the Standards
On 18/02/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 18.02.2013 01:15, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
[Andre] turn this into a switch that can be altered via Tools-Options
at runtime by the user. The user is ultimately the only person who knows
what the result of the
On Feb 18, 2013 1:16 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
Well, as you might imagine I am really tired of the flame storm that
went around the 0 ^ 0 issue. My intention here is not at all to re-start
that discussion. I really have much more fun things to do.
I am actualy a fan
On 2/18/13 1:15 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
Well, as you might imagine I am really tired of the flame storm that
went around the 0 ^ 0 issue. My intention here is not at all to re-start
that discussion. I really have much more fun things to do.
I am actualy a fan of Clint Eastwood so
On 18.02.2013 01:15, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
Well, as you might imagine I am really tired of the flame storm that
went around the 0 ^ 0 issue. My intention here is not at all to re-start
that discussion. I really have much more fun things to do.
I am actualy a fan of Clint Eastwood so let
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 18.02.2013 01:15, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
Well, as you might imagine I am really tired of the flame storm that
went around the 0 ^ 0 issue. My intention here is not at all to re-start
that discussion. I really
Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 06:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result of
0 ^ 0)
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 18.02.2013
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2/18/13 1:15 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
Well, as you might imagine I am really tired of the flame storm that
went around the 0 ^ 0 issue. My intention here is not at all to re-start
that discussion.
15 matches
Mail list logo
