On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Drew Jensen
> wrote:
>> Howdy Rob,
>>
>> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
>> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>>
>
> I've put in a r
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk
> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On S
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk
>> wrote:
>> >> > On Sat, O
Drat - I'm so far behind *laughing*..
The answer is no. I did just download it however and will look when I get
home.
Thanks again
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Drew Jensen
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I have no idea. Should we?
>
>
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> Well, it rather depends on what you are trying to do - I doubt that in this
> instance it would make much sense. Anyhow, it is r
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I have no idea. Should we?
Sorry for the delay.
Well, it rather depends on what you are trying to do - I doubt that in this
instance it would make much sense. Anyhow, it is rather a different subject
from the listing itself, and on that note
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk
> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello *,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello *,
> >>
> >>
> >> > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> >>
> >> > So...this thread does not meet "lazy con
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hello *,
>>
>>
>> > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
>>
>> > So...this thread does not meet "lazy consensus" but are we ready to
>> > implement this addition, without furth
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello *,
>
>
> > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
>
> > So...this thread does not meet "lazy consensus" but are we ready to
> > implement this addition, without further changes, anyway?
> > I'll be happy to
> > take care of this
Hello *,
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> So...this thread does not meet "lazy consensus" but are we ready to
> implement this addition, without further changes, anyway?
> I'll be happy to
> take care of this either later today or tomorrow if we are.
Can you please summariz
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>
>> Am 10/23/2013 12:04 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew
>> Jensen
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> Howdy Rob,
Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache Open
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 10/23/2013 12:04 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew
> Jensen
>> >wrote:
>>
>> Howdy Rob,
>>>
>>> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a
>>> la:
>>> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is
Am 10/23/2013 12:04 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensenwrote:
Howdy Rob,
Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
"IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
FYI on the existing consultant entries
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Howdy Rob,
>
> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>
I've put in a request to get that page updated.
> A couple of quick questions
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensen
> wrote:
>
>> Howdy Rob,
>>
>> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
>> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>>
>
> FYI on the e
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Howdy Rob,
>
> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>
FYI on the existing consultant entries
http://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consul
Howdy Rob,
Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
"IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
A couple of quick questions if I may.
Will the support only be available to those with the IBM connectors? IIRC
that was the plan in the pa
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> >
> > Sorry, but I think the website does not comply with the
> necessary formalities.
> >
> > Always has been emphasized, these are marked on the
> relevant websites trademark of Apache, for example:
> >
> > "IBM Support for Apache OpenOffice "
>
Rob Weir wrote:
In the context of the page it makes full acknowledgement of where
Apache OpenOffice is from.
The page footer, or the last paragraph of the text, could still explain
that Apache OpenOffice is a trademark of the Apache Software Foundation.
This is not confusing to users and won'
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
>
>> Received. Subject to lazy consensus as usual, we can add it to the
>> Consultants page in 72 hours.
>
> In this Case unfortunately: -1
>
> (But I do not know if I can vote her
Hello,
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Received. Subject to lazy consensus as usual, we can add it to the
> Consultants page in 72 hours.
In this Case unfortunately: -1
(But I do not know if I can vote here)
Sorry, but I think the website does not comply with the nec
Am 21.10.13 21:59, schrieb Rob Weir:
IBM
Global
Development
Support
Training
IBM® Support for Apache OpenOffice offers expert
technical support for Apache OpenOffice. With trusted IBM support,
you can confidently deploy Apache OpenOffice fo
Rob Weir wrote:
IBM
Global ...
Received. Subject to lazy consensus as usual, we can add it to the
Consultants page in 72 hours.
Regards,
Andrea.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openof
IBM
Global
Development
Support
Training
IBM® Support for Apache OpenOffice offers expert
technical support for Apache OpenOffice. With trusted IBM support,
you can confidently deploy Apache OpenOffice for your demanding
desktop office document requi
26 matches
Mail list logo
