Dear Jan,
I notice that there are still of our web sites that may need SSL
certificates, that is, extensions.openoffice.org and
templates.openoffice.org. But I have no privilege on these two sites.
Could these two sites be updated to use HTTPS, too? Thanks.
On 2013/11/01 04:44, Kay Schenk
Hmm it seems markmail does not allow me to reply inline, sorry for that.
extensions.o.o and templates.o.o are as far as I know not hosted on ASF
infrastructure, and therefore I (and infra) cannot provide https: access
Please talk with the host providers of extensions and templates, if they
are
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Joe/JanIV/Mark,
THANKS for getting the SSL certificate to work. We really, really
needed this for the wiki and forums!
Given the scope of the conversion
Hi Joe/JanIV/Mark,
THANKS for getting the SSL certificate to work. We really, really needed
this for the wiki and forums!
Given the scope of the conversion of internal relative links. I think it is
reasonable to expect that the project will not be in a hurry to start rushing
in to convert
On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Joe/JanIV/Mark,
THANKS for getting the SSL certificate to work. We really, really needed
this for the wiki and forums!
Given the scope of the conversion of internal relative links. I think it is
reasonable to expect that the
On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
Hi.
Thanks for taking care of this. People are asking this on Wiki and
forum (and even WWW) for long. And I know a wild card certificate is
very costly.
On 2013/10/27 16:05, janI said:
On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at
On 27 October 2013 11:53, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Thanks for taking care of this. People are asking this on Wiki and
forum (and even WWW) for long. And I know a wild card certificate is
very costly.
Thanks for your kind words.
In all this discussion about www, please
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:05 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct
On 27 October 2013 13:34, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:05 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
Hi.
On 27 October 2013 16:47, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote:
I don't think there are any plans to change the dual http/https nature of
the site, even in the worst case scenario of redirecting everything to
https, the old links will still resolve.
Why would this be a worst
janI wrote:
And if you look at INFRA-6608, you will see a comment from andrea 3 August:
And we will want to use it, even though there is no authentication there,
for
http(s)://www.openoffice.org
(this is mainly because we receive a steady, even if low, amount of
complaints from users who cannot
Hi.
www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced earlier.
We have however seen that e.g. product.css contain image tag with http://xxx.
All references must be relative (without http: and https:). I hope the web
admins can do make the needed changes.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
Hi.
www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced earlier.
We have however seen that e.g. product.css contain image tag with http://xxx.
All references must be relative (without http: and https:). I hope the web
On 26 October 2013 23:05, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
Hi.
www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced
earlier.
We have however seen that e.g. product.css contain image tag with
http://xxx.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:26:21PM +0200, janI wrote:
There are 26,349 matches of http://www.openoffice.org/; in
ooo-site.
I am glad you did not count http://; :-)
Please remember that a large part is in the templates, so change once
and rebuild site.
No, it's a grep in the site
On 26 October 2013 23:45, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:26:21PM +0200, janI wrote:
There are 26,349 matches of http://www.openoffice.org/; in
ooo-site.
I am glad you did not count http://; :-)
Please remember that a large part is in
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
Hi.
www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced earlier.
We have however seen that e.g. product.css contain image tag with http://xxx.
No. Ideally urls local to the site use relative addressing so it will work
properly when viewed over http or https. The reason you don't want hard coded
http urls on the site is because https browsers will warn the user about
fetching insecure resources.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 26,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
No. Ideally urls local to the site use relative addressing so it will work
properly when viewed over http or https. The reason you don't want hard
coded http urls on the site is because https browsers will warn
I don't think there are any plans to change the dual http/https nature of the
site, even in the worst case scenario of redirecting everything to https, the
old links will still resolve.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 26, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
Hi.
www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced
earlier.
We have
24 matches
Mail list logo
