You haven't told us what list you mean but I found your name here:
https://www.openoffice.org/de/marketing/referenzkunden.html
Please write to this mailing list the details you want to see changed.
Then we can change the data on the webpage.
Thanks
Marcus
Am 08/30/2015 04:36 AM, schrieb D
Hi everyone, My name is Prem Pandya, 26, I live in Niles, IL and Im an
undergrad at DePaul University studying computer science. I'm eager to
contribute to this open source project!
Andrea Pescetti has granted hanya
's request for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 125991: Fatal Error "index out of bounds" on Gtk
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125991
--- Comment #8 from Andrea Pescetti ---
Reviewed, accepted as blocker, fixes a fatal error and also has duplicates.
@
Hi,
> On 29 Aug 15, at 21:13, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> As me from my soapbox:
>
> Any proposal for reworking trademark policies would naturally "grandfather"
> prior arrangements. My hope is that any rework of policies would be more and
> not less generous than current reality.
>
> I think tha
On 06/08/2015 bugzilla wrote:
Marcus has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126447: When using LanguageTools, toggling the checkbox "check grammar"
in the spell checker removes content
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126447
This is committed to trunk, not yet to AOO410 (OpenOffic
Hello,
Andrea, I was wondering if, since there are several release blockers
around, if I could still be in time to update the English dictionaries
to be used in AOO 4.1.2?
I have everything ready for an update and I could do it today (although
the official release date is always the 1st of e
Andrea Pescetti has granted Andrea Pescetti
's request for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126454: Update English dictionary to version 2015.08.01
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126454
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Pescetti ---
This is a routine update, already committed to trunk, now por
>From the Chair,
I need to speak up about the "rebasing" business.
1. Use of the ALv2 has nothing to do with trademarks, so this conversation
should be on a separate thread.
2. However, it probably should not be held here and certainly not privately by
the PMC. If someone wants to pursue
I'm wondering about the following.
I think the "based on X" conversation is already happening at a general level
and I believe participation at that level is better, since this will probably
be simple and generic and VP Brand Management will likely take a position that
applies to us also.
On 30/08/2015 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
Andrea, I was wondering if, since there are several release blockers
around, if I could still be in time to update the English dictionaries
to be used in AOO 4.1.2?
Yes, no problem. As I wrote in the issue:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126454#c
Andrea,
Here is the e-mail to the dev list as I can't find the "clone issue".
I already uploaded 2015.09.01 today after we exchanged a few e-mails and
I clicked in the download button and it seems to be working okay.
:-P
What more can be done?
Thanks!
Kind regards,
>Marco A.G.Pinto
Am 08/30/2015 05:42 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 06/08/2015 bugzilla wrote:
Marcus has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126447: When using LanguageTools, toggling the checkbox "check
grammar"
in the spell checker removes content
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126447
This is
On 08/30/2015 08:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 bugzilla wrote:
>> Marcus has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
>> Issue 126447: When using LanguageTools, toggling the checkbox "check
>> grammar"
>> in the spell checker removes content
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Kay Schenk wrote:
I did not encounter problems building with patch version 2.6, so I never
applied this patch. I'm rebuilding now to see if the patch works OK for
me. More feedback later today.
You surely meant the other thread/issue:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126258
and indeed
I appreciate all your diligence about licenses. It is valuable. Whatever you
want to call this thread ...
One intention was to discuss what if anything is required with respect to
trademarks when ANY third party product is (re)based on Apache OpenOffice.
For example it cannot be called OpenOffi
On 08/30/2015 12:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> I did not encounter problems building with patch version 2.6, so I never
>> applied this patch. I'm rebuilding now to see if the patch works OK for
>> me. More feedback later today.
>
> You surely meant the other thread/issue:
On 08/29/2015 12:37 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
>>> Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and ha
Oh, I'm sorry, Dave. I thought I was making it clear, on this change of
subject, that I am not talking about trademarks but only 3rd parties deriving
from ALv2 code itself, including by "rebasing," forking, or any other means.
With regard to the use of marks and "Powered By" I agree that is sep
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 14 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 09/08/2015 Don Lewis wrote:
>>> Looks like you are compiling with gcc 4.9. I ran into this same problem
>>> on FreeBSD and worked around it by changing the "-Os" optimization flag
>>> ... This is a gcc bug, see:
>>> https://gcc.
No they shouldn't. It's possible something broke. Do you have a log of
the build?
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/29/2015 12:37 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrot
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/29/2015 12:37 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to
Hi Dennis;
I find your posting somewhat confusing as the topic would indicate something
different from the body of the message.
I agree in observation 5 that the ASF (actually I can only speak
partially for AOO)
does *not* police the use of ALv2 content by third parties. This, of
course, doesn
Thank you for your remarks, Pedro.
Just two things:
1. I was referring to LICENSE and NOTICE files in an installed binary
distribution. I should have used NOTICE file, since that is what is named in
ALv2, and I should have said copy of the license, not a specific LICENSE file.
I verifie
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/29/2015 12:37 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
Andrea Pescetti has granted 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126495: Update English dictionary to version 2015.09.01
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126495
--- Description ---
Version 2015.09.01 of the English dictionary is available. Update source code
to use it. See http://extensions.o
Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
Here is the e-mail to the dev list as I can't find the "clone issue".
OK, no problem! New issue created at
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126495
and I'll take care of it when time allows, surely before the 4.1.2 release.
But please let us know if (when logged
26 matches
Mail list logo