RE: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 09:55 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform? > > Am 27.01.2017 um 18:50 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > > > > > >> -Original

RE: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 00:08 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute! > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Simon Phipps

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 20:04 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 09:55 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform? Am 27.01.2017 um 18:50 schrieb Dennis

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

On 27.01.2017 20:17, Marcus wrote: And it is crucial that the hashes and signature files *not* be mirrored. Having them only available at dist.apache.org is the secure way to detect that the mirror-downloaded binary is authentic and unaltered. right, we as OpenOffice project we should make

Re: Fwd: New Pootle Account

Has this been taken care of? We have a growing number of volunteers on l10n@ waiting for a Pootle account or even an answer... I remember, some time ago when I wanted to contribute as a user I had to write 3 (!) mails to the list to get an account. This must be improved, because we do not only

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 12:45 schrieb toki: On 01/27/2017 07:41 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: I don't think we need complex categories here (especially because with them a maintenance burden would come). In that source code README, "supported" probably means "a platform for which we strive at producing

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Marcus: > Am 27.01.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> On 27.01.2017 20:17, Marcus wrote: >>> And it is crucial that the hashes and signature files *not* be >>> mirrored. Having them only available at dist.apache.org is the secure >>> way to detect that the

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

On 27.01.2017 20:39, Marcus wrote: Am 27.01.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 27.01.2017 20:17, Marcus wrote: And it is crucial that the hashes and signature files *not* be mirrored. Having them only available at dist.apache.org is the secure way to detect that the mirror-downloaded

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

On 27.01.2017 20:39, Marcus wrote: Am 27.01.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 27.01.2017 20:17, Marcus wrote: And it is crucial that the hashes and signature files *not* be mirrored. Having them only available at dist.apache.org is the secure way to detect that the mirror-downloaded

RE: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 11:46 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform? > > Am 27.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Marcus: > > Am 27.01.2017 um

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 27.01.2017 20:17, Marcus wrote: And it is crucial that the hashes and signature files *not* be mirrored. Having them only available at dist.apache.org is the secure way to detect that the mirror-downloaded binary is authentic and unaltered.

Re: [Homepage] Favicon for openoffice.apache.org

Am 27.01.2017 um 23:57 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 27.01.2017 um 23:54 schrieb Marcus: Am 27.01.2017 um 23:20 schrieb Matthias Seidel: We did not have our own favicon.ico for openoffice.apache.org. So the site took the one from apache.org. But that one was faulty. ;-)

Re: Build issues in r1776040

This post with patches doesn't got a reply until now. So, please can a developer have a look? Thanks a lot Marcus Am 28.12.2016 um 05:33 schrieb Páder Rezső: Hi all, I now compiled the rev 1776040 from svn export, and I found some build issues. I not a developer or c/c++ programmer, so

Re: [Homepage] Favicon for openoffice.apache.org

Am 27.01.2017 um 23:54 schrieb Marcus: > Am 27.01.2017 um 23:20 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> We did not have our own favicon.ico for openoffice.apache.org. So the >> site took the one from apache.org. >> But that one was faulty. ;-) >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13370 >> >> So I

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb toki: > On 01/27/2017 05:58 PM, Marcus wrote: > >> For the source code Readme it's for sure enough. However, I don't know if it >> should be just for the this Readme. > Maybe the main help page (http://www.openoffice.org/support/index.html) > can have a link saying

Re: [Homepage] Favicon for openoffice.apache.org

Am 27.01.2017 um 23:20 schrieb Matthias Seidel: We did not have our own favicon.ico for openoffice.apache.org. So the site took the one from apache.org. But that one was faulty. ;-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13370 So I created our own feather icon. My question is: Should we

[Homepage] Favicon for openoffice.apache.org

Hello all, We did not have our own favicon.ico for openoffice.apache.org. So the site took the one from apache.org. But that one was faulty. ;-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13370 So I created our own feather icon. My question is: Should we stay with the Apache feather or can we

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

I think in future independent download source can become less accepted. We should think of officially accept certain distribution routes. For the definition of support I would go for what the community provides. If we have people interested in FreeBSD then it's fine for me to call it supported.

RE: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

In thinking about this, I suggest that supported means (1) dist.apache.org authenticated binary distributions (as mirrored) are provided from source releases and (2) bugzilla provides for the platform as a named OS [type]. I note that OS/2 and FreeBSD (and Solaris) qualify under (2) but not

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:49:51 -0800 "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote: > In thinking about this, I suggest that supported means (1) dist.apache.org > authenticated binary distributions (as mirrored) are provided from source > releases and (2) bugzilla provides for the platform as a

RE: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

> -Original Message- > From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 07:59 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform? > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:49:51 -0800 > "Dennis E. Hamilton"

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 18:50 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 07:59 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform? On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:49:51 -0800

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> On 2017-01-27, at 14:04, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > While there was much heat, I don't think Sun was pure in this matter. Not by > any means. Whatever the case, when Apache OpenOffice was founded, it was as > an Apache Project, not any other kind. The "original"

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 20:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 27.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Marcus: Am 27.01.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 27.01.2017 20:17, Marcus wrote: And it is crucial that the hashes and signature files *not* be mirrored. Having them only available at dist.apache.org is the

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Am 27.01.2017 um 21:22 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 11:46 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform? >> >> Am

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Some misc. comments: In reply to Peter Kovacs; Would it be more wise to go for BSD as OS instead of one distribution FreeBSD? Or are BSD variants incompatible to each other? BSD variants are certainly incompatible with each other as the result of about 25 years of divergence. AFAICT, the