Am 16.12.20 um 20:12 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:58:42 +0100
Marcus wrote:
Am 13.12.20 um 19:51 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.12.20 um 17:57 schrieb Volker Höhfeld:
before sending an answer to the author:
der Computer sagt nach dem herungerladen,
Aphe_OpenOffice_4 Image nicht
Am 13.12.20 um 19:51 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.12.20 um 17:57 schrieb Volker Höhfeld:
before sending an answer to the author:
der Computer sagt nach dem herungerladen,
Aphe_OpenOffice_4 Image nicht anerkannt.
In English:
"
After the download the computer says,
Aphe_OpenOffice_4 Image not found
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:58:42 +0100
Marcus wrote:
> Am 13.12.20 um 19:51 schrieb Marcus:
> > Am 12.12.20 um 17:57 schrieb Volker Höhfeld:
> >
> > before sending an answer to the author:
> >
> >> der Computer sagt nach dem herungerladen,
> >>
> >> Aphe_OpenOffice_4 Image nicht anerkannt.
> >
>
Just a FYI: I have been invited to the official BeanShell team and so it is
likely that my fork will be folded back into beanshell.org as the v2.x version
while we work on the v3.x version in parallel.
Right now I have a 2.2.0b1 release and I'm looking into seeing how far we can
take it.
> On
leginee commented on pull request #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/112#issuecomment-746352262
> I think I did remove it, is it not gone? this commit history is messy...
Probably I had some caching issue or tomatos on my eyes. I did not see that
you removed the
leginee edited a comment on pull request #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/112#issuecomment-746352262
> I think I did remove it, is it not gone? this commit history is messy...
Probably I had some caching issue or tomatos on my eyes. I did not see that
you removed
ardovm opened a new pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113
As per a recent thread on the dev@ mailing list, the "dmake clean" command
may wipe out the whole source tree, if the build environment was not set by
sourcing the appropriate `.Env` script.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:21:41 +0100
Marcus wrote:
> Am 16.12.20 um 20:12 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:58:42 +0100
> > Marcus wrote:
> >
> >> Am 13.12.20 um 19:51 schrieb Marcus:
> >>> Am 12.12.20 um 17:57 schrieb Volker Höhfeld:
> >>>
> >>> before sending an answer to the
Am 14.12.20 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 14, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 14.12.20 um 00:28 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2020, at 3:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 13.12.20 um 22:51 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:43 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 13.12.20 um 18:46
> On 12/16/2020 7:49 PM Marcus wrote:
> IMHO a bit too much effort for just a little value add. I can insert the
> comment without the mail address. It can be easily found out anyway.
Why is it necessary to remove the mail address? It is a public email, it is
mentioned many times on this
Am 12.12.20 um 17:57 schrieb Volker Höhfeld:
Hi Volker,
first of all please note that this mailing list is in English language
only. Therefore my and any further answer, too:
der Computer sagt nach dem herungerladen,
Aphe_OpenOffice_4 Image nicht anerkannt.
In English:
"
After the
The release notes in German, maybe also helpfull:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=165224926
@Volker Höhfeld:
Wir vermuten das der Gatekeeper Probleme macht.
Für support in deutsch: user...@openoffice.apache.org
Es gibt auch eine deutsche dev liste
That's great Jim!
On 12/16/20 11:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a FYI: I have been invited to the official BeanShell team and so it is
likely that my fork will be folded back into beanshell.org as the v2.x version
while we work on the v3.x version in parallel.
Right now I have a 2.2.0b1
We’ve got a backlog of PRs. Many seem to have been reviewed. Who will do the
merges?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Am 16.12.20 um 23:34 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On 12/16/2020 7:49 PM Marcus wrote:
IMHO a bit too much effort for just a little value add. I can insert the
comment without the mail address. It can be easily found out anyway.
Why is it necessary to remove the mail address? It is a public email,
Hi All,
I think I've fixed the blank pages problem in the Developer Guide.
I've spot checked through all of the spreadsheet pages that had many
broken and they all display now.
Please check any that you have reported and let me know if you find any
that are still blank.
For those
Am 17.12.20 um 00:53 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I think I've fixed the blank pages problem in the Developer Guide.
I've spot checked through all of the spreadsheet pages that had many
broken and they all display now.
Please check any that you have reported and let me know if you find any
that are
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 16, 2020, at 4:18 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 16.12.20 um 23:34 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On 12/16/2020 7:49 PM Marcus wrote:
>>> IMHO a bit too much effort for just a little value add. I can insert the
>>> comment without the mail address. It can be easily found
Hi Keith,
please send slack invite.
Additionally - dev team - I am working on Pi port still - just updated to dec
release of Pi OS.
-marcia
- Original Message -
From: "Keith N. McKenna"
To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020
Do you have anything in the pipes for chrome/OS or Chromebooks?
--
Richard McCain
703-946-5222 (C)
703-730-9198 (H)
Latest AOO version works.
Here the guide how to do this:
https://youtu.be/MJUUUp3ufN8
- Mail original -
> De: "Richard Mccain"
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Décembre 2020 02:40:13
> Objet: Chromebook
>
> Do you have anything in the pipes for chrome/OS or
On 16 Dec, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
>> On 12/15/20 3:37 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> >
>> > On 15.12.20 20:14, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:57 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
Grosskopf commented on pull request #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/112#issuecomment-746000980
> If not needed I would would opt that the dead code is removed. :) Can you
remove it? or should I check how I can incorporate this wish?
I think I did remove it, is
23 matches
Mail list logo
