Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 7, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>> Did you rewrite or reuse?
>> If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the
>> copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright.
>>
Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
Did you rewrite or reuse?
If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the
copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright.
Dave Fisher wrote:
Did you rewrite or reuse?
If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the
copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright.
The unasked question is the license and you’ll have to choose the Creative
Commons license plus
Czesław Wolański wrote:
Hi all,
Just started reading the GSG. Many thanks to everyone involved!
@Keith
Another minor thing, on page 12 a comma in
“look and feel,”
Regards,
Czesław
Czeslaw;
Thanks for the compliments Czeslaw. As to the placement of the comma
inside the double quotation
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:39:52 -0500
"Keith N. McKenna" wrote:
I am a bit out of my depth on Copyright Holder for the updated 4.1 User
Guides should be. I see foure possible scenarios for this.
1) The ASF
2) The Project
3) The Documentation Team.
4) Listing the Individual
