Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages
On 03/12/2014 Simon Phipps wrote: I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from the iTunes store now he's seen what they did. Thanks, if that was serious (on his side, of course) this will indeed solve the problem. I see the app is no longer available at the link I posted earlier; this of course does not guarantee that it won't resurface at a different URL, but it solves the immediate problem. It looks like that with this and with the (still pending, but with no objections so far) consensus on rejecting Quick Office Pro messages with an appropriate explanation, we are well-equipped to solve the issue. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
oooforum
For information: the old forum (oooforum.org) is currently flagged as follows NOTICE: This domain name expired on 02/12/2014 and is pending renewal or deletion. This might be an appropriate time to renew/continue earlier discussions . -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[DEV, WEBDAV] About issue i125194 and file lock under Webdav
Hi all, it's some time I don't write to the list, but even though I last coded for AOO (was OOo then and some years have elapsed...) I continued to follow the project all along. Anyway, I'm writing about issue i125194 [1] because Davide Dozza discussed the problem with me and I decided to have a look into it, trying to provide a patch. I studied part of the involved the code and I found that some of the needed code is already in place, but it seems that the final implementation of the lock mechanism for webdav [2] is not fully implemented. Some questions: 1) I need some explanation on the way the webdav file lock is supposed to work. In webdav content provider [3],[4] or somewhere else? 2) currently the file lock mechanism is implemented in module sf2 using a dedicated hidden file [5], are other mechanisms for it? 3) I found a property named IsReadOnly, checked here [6] but nowhere this property is managed aside from receiving a default 'false' value. Was this prepared for the lock mechanisms managed somehow in module ucb? Of course I need to know if I'm talking nonsense on the above points :-). My set-up to debug AOO: Linux Ubuntu 14.04 emacs and gdb to edit and debug I submitted a ICLA to Apache Software Foundation on Apache Software on May 9th, 2012. Thanks in advance -- Kind Regards, Giuseppe Castagno Acca Esse http://www.acca-esse.eu giuseppe.castagno at acca-esse.eu [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125194 [2] http://www.webdav.org/specs/rfc4918.html#locking [3] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/AppendixC/The_WebDAV_Content_Provider [4] http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/ucb/source/ucp/webdav [5] http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1023 [6] http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1065 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting broken download link
The .deb and RPM binaries of 4.1.1 OO aren't working. I've confirmed the links are broken on ChromiumOS, Ubuntu, and Windows 8.
Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages
Am 12/03/2014 02:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weirr...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage
where we explain to the user that we are not QuickOffice Pro? If we
do that then we would get no (or far fewer) emails, right?
I doubt there will be a common referrer as the links on
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
just point to openoffice.org and the users getting through seem to be smart
enough to find a contact address. But if there was a way to do that it
would be even better, yes.
I understand. It should be possible to detect and redirect all
incoming website requests that originate from
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512
This could be done preferably at the Apache HTTP Server level, or
(less reliably) on our home page with a Javascript redirect:
script
if ( window.document.referrer.indexOf(
/itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512 ) != -1 ) {
location.href = http://www.openoffice.org/new-special-page.html;;
}
/script
ah, good idea as long as the app is still in the store - or at least the
wrong link.
I can take care of this as soon as SVN is working again.
Marcus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages
On 12/02/2014 05:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage
where we explain to the user that we are not QuickOffice Pro? If we
do that then we would get no (or far fewer) emails, right?
I doubt there will be a common referrer as the links on
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
just point to openoffice.org and the users getting through seem to be smart
enough to find a contact address. But if there was a way to do that it
would be even better, yes.
I understand. It should be possible to detect and redirect all
incoming website requests that originate from
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512
This could be done preferably at the Apache HTTP Server level, or
(less reliably) on our home page with a Javascript redirect:
script
if ( window.document.referrer.indexOf(
/itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512 ) != -1 ) {
location.href = http://www.openoffice.org/new-special-page.html;;
}
/script
Regards,
-Rob
I'm strongly supportive of something like this in the interim. Google
owns the name and it's clear Lee Elman has (at least) violated some
kind of trademark rules/uses. We should report this to both Google and
Apple (iTunes) at this point.
The fact that Lee Elman has decided www.openoffice.org is the Lee Elman
Web Site is directly of concern to us.
If Rob feels so inclined, I'm good with Lazy Consensus for the script
addition and whatever new-special-page.html might contain.
S.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
--
-
MzK
One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth
to a dancing star.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from the iTunes store now he's seen what they did. Following up: The app causing the unwanted e-mail traffic has now been removed from the App Store (as have most of the other scams I mentioned in my InfoWorld article). S.
[CODE] old business...patches
The following query lists issues of type = PATCH https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamedlist_id=162879namedcmd=PATCHES You will need to be a registered Bugzilla user to view it. It would be helpful for QA and dev team members to determine if the submitted patches are still relevant. Bulk notification may not have reached patch contributors. -- - MzK One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. -- Friedrich Nietzsche - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hunspell unmunching question
Hello! Around a week ago, Peter from England sent me an e-mail suggesting new words to be added to en_GB. One of them was unsubscribe. Here is what appears in Proofing Tool GUI: The strange thing is that I tried the variants in Mozilla and OpenOffice and none of them was marked as a typo. I started meditating about it and wondered if in Hunspell the prefixes would attach themselves to all suffixes. Today I made a test, please see the archive: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/30674540/hunspell_issue_marcoagpinto_20141204.zip It contains the extracted wordlists both in PTG and Unmunch and also the .DIC + .AFF I created for the tests. In my PTG 3.0 build 67 I get: *subscribe** **resubscribe** **subscribing** **oversubscribe** **subscribes** **subscribed** **unsubscribe** **000** **subscribe** **unsubscribe** **resubscribe** **subscribing** **oversubscribe** **subscribes** **subscribed** ** *In Unmunch for Linux I got: *subscribe** **subscribing** **subscribed** **subscribes** **resubscribing** **oversubscribing** **unsubscribing** **resubscribed** **oversubscribed** **unsubscribed** **resubscribes** **oversubscribes** **unsubscribes** **resubscribe** **oversubscribe** **unsubscribe** **000** **subscribe** **subscribing** **subscribed** **subscribes** **resubscribing** **oversubscribing** **unsubscribing** **resubscribed** **oversubscribed** **unsubscribed** **resubscribes** **oversubscribes** **unsubscribes** **resubscribe** **oversubscribe** **unsubscribe** ** *I placed a 000 to divide the same word with an exchanged order of the code U to make sure it would produce the same results, no matter its position. What this means is that I probably need to change the code of my tool, maybe create three arrays: 1st - to store the words with suffixes 2nd - to store the codes of the prefixes 3rd - to store 1st plus all its combinations with the prefixes (it would apply prefixes to 1st and store them in 3rd ) Then, I would display the prefixes at the bottom in PTG not following the order of the codes? What this also means is that there are hundreds of combinations not appearing in the wordlist which I always publish in .txt in the GitHub of the project but that are processed by Hunspell in Mozilla (Firefox, Thunderbird and SeaMonkey) and Apache OpenOffice. Thanks for your time! Kind regards, Marco A.G.Pinto -- --
Re: oooforum
Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup to clear all the issues, and fast-track to a conclusion and actions. On 12/4/14, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: For information: the old forum (oooforum.org) is currently flagged as follows NOTICE: This domain name expired on 02/12/2014 and is pending renewal or deletion. This might be an appropriate time to renew/continue earlier discussions . -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: [DEV, WEBDAV] About issue i125194 and file lock under Webdav
It would be good to reconcile whatever that AOO code is attempting to do and the WebDAV locking model, specified now in RFC4918, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4918. (There is a locking-related Errata item as well.) There is an extensive treatment of how much discovery and negotiation might be required, and how much is going to be a function of server-side implementation-dependent behavior. Whatever is done, it clearly should not be an overlay on WebDAV that only works when everyone is using a (matching) AOO release to access a WebDAV-stored document. The WebDAV mailing lists are pretty quiet these days (or my subscription has lapsed). That might be a good place for further clarification, if needed. That's an interesting task. Good luck and thanks for looking into it. -- Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430 https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail -Original Message- From: Giuseppe Castagno [mailto:giuseppe.casta...@acca-esse.eu] Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 02:49 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Spam (8.02):[DEV, WEBDAV] About issue i125194 and file lock under Webdav Hi all, it's some time I don't write to the list, but even though I last coded for AOO (was OOo then and some years have elapsed...) I continued to follow the project all along. Anyway, I'm writing about issue i125194 [1] because Davide Dozza discussed the problem with me and I decided to have a look into it, trying to provide a patch. I studied part of the involved the code and I found that some of the needed code is already in place, but it seems that the final implementation of the lock mechanism for webdav [2] is not fully implemented. Some questions: 1) I need some explanation on the way the webdav file lock is supposed to work. In webdav content provider [3],[4] or somewhere else? 2) currently the file lock mechanism is implemented in module sf2 using a dedicated hidden file [5], are other mechanisms for it? 3) I found a property named IsReadOnly, checked here [6] but nowhere this property is managed aside from receiving a default 'false' value. Was this prepared for the lock mechanisms managed somehow in module ucb? Of course I need to know if I'm talking nonsense on the above points :-). My set-up to debug AOO: Linux Ubuntu 14.04 emacs and gdb to edit and debug I submitted a ICLA to Apache Software Foundation on Apache Software on May 9th, 2012. Thanks in advance -- Kind Regards, Giuseppe Castagno Acca Esse http://www.acca-esse.eu giuseppe.castagno at acca-esse.eu [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125194 [2] http://www.webdav.org/specs/rfc4918.html#locking [3] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/AppendixC/The_WebDAV_Content_Provider [4] http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/ucb/source/ucp/webdav [5] http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1023 [6] http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1065 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: oooforum
Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: oooforum
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
Wiki and Forum vms.
Hi all This is just an update to keep you all informed about whats happening with our vms. Having looked at the vms, I have identified a couple of severe issues: - We cannot update to ubuntu 14.04.1, that requires puppet3 (we currently use puppet2). - The diskspace on / of wiki is too restricted (logs should be moved to somewhere else). - ATS on wiki is past end of life, and should be removed/replaced - php2bb should be updated. - Some forums seems unused, but still use db connections Remark: these problems are NOT caused by the maintenance pescetti did, which was OK, but the fact that we as project should have acted long time ago. I have had a discussion with infra about how best to address these issues, and our common opinion, is that the best solution is to roll 1 or 2 new vms, install the applications again. Furthermore look into having ATS (new version) running in a separate vm to help take load from both forum and vm. This is of course a task, that takes some careful planning, and not something I just plan to do a weekend where I have time. I hope to be able to do this end of this year. rgds jan i.
opengrok.
Hi all. I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of opengrok. Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? rgds jan i
Re: oooforum
On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. The disk will not be the problem, but moving 100G across the net requires a lot of bandwidth in the endsthat is going to take quite a long time. Getting a dvd/usbkey would be a lot faster. rgds jan i. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
Re: oooforum
Is a rough estimate and yeah 100g will be a good 4 to 8 days. But a, I don't think it will come to 100g and b, the process will be between servers so it shouldn't be an issue. I could rent a vps with 100g for 4 days but then it would need additionally 4 more days to transfer to apache. If I put it on my lame dsl it might take 10x more. On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. The disk will not be the problem, but moving 100G across the net requires a lot of bandwidth in the endsthat is going to take quite a long time. Getting a dvd/usbkey would be a lot faster. rgds jan i. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
Re: oooforum
I could use people.apache.org a df shows me 1.2tb free Not sure if there is a quota for my user I could wget the whole site. On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. The disk will not be the problem, but moving 100G across the net requires a lot of bandwidth in the endsthat is going to take quite a long time. Getting a dvd/usbkey would be a lot faster. rgds jan i. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
Re: oooforum
Seems the domain already expire. On 12/4/14, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: I could use people.apache.org a df shows me 1.2tb free Not sure if there is a quota for my user I could wget the whole site. On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. The disk will not be the problem, but moving 100G across the net requires a lot of bandwidth in the endsthat is going to take quite a long time. Getting a dvd/usbkey would be a lot faster. rgds jan i. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting broken download link
Is this still the case for you? At this moment, they seem fine for me. I'm using our main download page -- http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Sarik Jeram topdawg7...@gmail.com wrote: The .deb and RPM binaries of 4.1.1 OO aren't working. I've confirmed the links are broken on ChromiumOS, Ubuntu, and Windows 8. -- - MzK One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Fwd: [CODE] old business...patches -- link correction
-- Forwarded message -- From: Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [CODE] old business...patches To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Well spotted by Regina. The correct link is https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=162913namedcmd=PATCHESremaction=runsharer_id=7 Regards, Pedro My apologies, folks. I guess I chopped off the complete link in error. :( Thanks for the correction. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: Kay Schenk schrieb: The following query lists issues of type = PATCH https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed; list_id=162879namedcmd=PATCHES You will need to be a registered Bugzilla user to view it. It would be helpful for QA and dev team members to determine if the submitted patches are still relevant. Bulk notification may not have reached patch contributors. The link does not work for me. But go to your Preferences and there to the tab Saved Searches. In the lower part you will find the search PATCHES and can run it. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. -- Friedrich Nietzsche -- - MzK One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Re: opengrok.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:10 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi all. I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of opengrok. Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? rgds jan i Can't help but ... cool! Every project could use this capability. -- - MzK One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Re: oooforum
On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote: Seems the domain already expire. This would not be an issue in itself. Yes, it would be good to preserve the old links, but preserving knowledge is better. So if we can get the dump and files from Ed we can setup the forum at Apache and give it a new URL. Everything else is pure speculation until then, so let's not start to waste time discussing the required disk space and bandwidth until we are sure that the data transfer can actually happen. And no, wget is not an option, we want the full database and files, so that we will be able to reinstall the forum at a new URL and then proceed as we will agree. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: opengrok.
jan i wrote: Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? Not me, but the current OpenGrok for OpenOffice at http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/ is managed by committers, so they might be available to give you details, or even move it to Apache. I, for one, would fully support that we host it at Apache. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: oooforum
On 12/4/14, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote: Seems the domain already expire. This would not be an issue in itself. Yes, it would be good to preserve the old links, but preserving knowledge is better. So if we can get the dump and files from Ed we can setup the forum at Apache and give it a new URL. wget doesnt preserve the links but do an html copy of the old website, basically what you are asking from Ed. The thing is that anyone can do this, using a simple: wget -m (mirror) oooforum.org. Of course oooforum.org currently gives you a godaddy page. My original question was if there was a follow up after your request? Everything else is pure speculation until then, so let's not start to waste time discussing the required disk space and bandwidth until we are sure that the data transfer can actually happen. And no, wget is not an option, we want the full database and files, so that we will be able to reinstall the forum at a new URL and then proceed as we will agree. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: oooforum
On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. Problem is that it was not able to package up what was needed so that it could be downloaded. I have plenty of storage to have been able to download it. I did a scrape of the pages, and it is about 8GB last time I did it. Off hand, I expect that a huge chunk of that is SPAM, especially since most of the SPAMS have large graphics included. I considered writing a PERL script to clean that based on certain search criteria, but, it just feels like a huge annoyance to spend hours removing posts and then trolling the rest of the files to rearrange all of the links so that things continue to function. So, I did not start the clean-up process from my scrape. -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: oooforum
Well the next step would be to transfer this to apache and then do a collaborative cleanup. On Dec 4, 2014 6:16 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote: On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative and we had a brief exchange of e-mails a few months ago. The outcome, with no need of dedicated discussions, is that the best solution is: 1) Edward keeps the oooforum.org domain name, since it has historically been his 2) We agree that Ed will point oooforum.org to something like forum-archive.openoffice.org (the name is made up, but I mean something under Apache control) 3) Ed provides Apache with a full database dump and a full files tree for the phpbb installation now powering oooforum.org 4) oooforum.org remains as a public archive, but gradually we encourage people to post to forum.openoffice.org (a neutral resource, but on Apache infrastructure and under control of the project) If Ed agrees with this, we can surely implement it reasonably quickly. But we will need action from his side for item #3. Agreed and maybe he is under a lot of work. My question here is if he ever got back, were there further outreach? And is it possible to share the admin credentials with an AOO contributor like Andrew P. I heard he already did an rsync of the site but was too large to hold on his client. Maybe AOO could share a space to rsync there as a read-only. And then perform some cleanup to tag spam posts and delete the pages. 100G should do it IMO. Problem is that it was not able to package up what was needed so that it could be downloaded. I have plenty of storage to have been able to download it. I did a scrape of the pages, and it is about 8GB last time I did it. Off hand, I expect that a huge chunk of that is SPAM, especially since most of the SPAMS have large graphics included. I considered writing a PERL script to clean that based on certain search criteria, but, it just feels like a huge annoyance to spend hours removing posts and then trolling the rest of the files to rearrange all of the links so that things continue to function. So, I did not start the clean-up process from my scrape. -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
