Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

2015-03-25 Thread Pedro Giffuni

Hello;

Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular
since it's the last version without systemd.

This would put up less pressure on infra for the buildbot and let us use
by default a newer toolchain.

Regards,

Pedro.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-03-25 Thread wolf . halton
Yes, thank you for the repetition. 
🐮
Wolf

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 8, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Marcus  wrote:
> 
> Am 03/08/2015 04:52 PM, schrieb jan i:
>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Marcus  wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com:
>>> 
 Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git?
 +1 any Git.
>>> 
>>> the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving to Git would make
>>> changes on the website impossible - until someone rewrites the code that is
>>> doing the staging and publishing, so that it is (maybe additionally) also
>>> working with Git.
>>> 
>>> Thats what I heard. It doesn't need to be the full truth but sounds logic
>>> for me. ;-)
>> 
>> I think it was said before, we talk about the code not the website. Due to
>> CMS we cannot currently move the web site so that will remain untouched in
>> SVN.
> 
> sure, I know that. But maybe Wolf had missed this. That's the reason why I 
> wrote it again. ;-)
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
>>>  On Mar 1, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
> 
> I'm going to add my +1 to this proposal.
> 
> It occurred to me, when looking into the "old OOo SVN dumps" that Rob
> has, that there may be many more downstream users that are on Git and that
> our being on Git would facilitate accepting appropriately-offered pull
> requests to the AOO repository.  It seems this is a lower-friction way of
> sending fixes upstream than going the patch creation and submission route.
> 
> - Dennis
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 04:01
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> If possible to get a git repo only it make sense. That means we don't
> have to move any webpage related stuff into git. Just the pure code is
> relevant her.
> 
> +1 for a git repo
> 
> Juergen
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: database problem

2015-03-25 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 05:37:36 PM Mary Lou Trice wrote:
> Hi Folks, I have created 2 tables in design view:  Basic Table  and  Dues
> Table. Please read the attachment to see the tables.  My previous e-mail
> was not so easy to read.
> 
> There is a "relationship" between Basic.ID and Dues.ID
> 
> I can enter data into the Basic table but cannot enter data intothe Dues
> table.
> 
> Can anyone help me?
> Mary Lou
>  
Please use ODT, docx and odt have issues when it comes to fields because they 
manage them different. 

OpenOffice has it's own widet set by inserting form controllers (Insert -> Form 
controllers). 

If the other parties use OpenOffice, you are safe, if you dont and you need to 
share, then you are out of luck and should use something different like Google 
Forms. (or encourage the other parties to also use OpenOffice :) ) 

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: database problem

2015-03-25 Thread F C. Costero
Can you please ask this question on the user forum:
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/? There are more people available for
user support there. You will need to register to post your question.
Best regards,
Francis

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Mary Lou Trice  wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> I have created 2 tables in design view:  *Basic Table  *and  *Dues Table.*
>
> Please read the attachment to see the tables.  My previous e-mail was not
> so easy to read.
>
> There is a "relationship" between Basic.ID and Dues.ID
>
>
>  I can enter data into the Basic table but cannot enter data into the
> Dues table.
>
>
>  Can anyone help me?
>
> Mary Lou
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>


database problem

2015-03-25 Thread Mary Lou Trice
Hi Folks, I have created 2 tables in design view:  Basic Table  and  Dues Table.
Please read the attachment to see the tables.  My previous e-mail was not so 
easy to read.

There is a "relationship" between Basic.ID and Dues.ID

I can enter data into the Basic table but cannot enter data intothe Dues table.

Can anyone help me?
Mary Lou
 


Basic and Dues tables.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

database problem

2015-03-25 Thread Mary Lou Trice
Hi Folks,
I have created 2 tables in design view:
Basic TableID (key) Integer [INTEGER]
Last Name    Text [VARCHAR]..other varchar 
fields**
Dues TableID (Index) not unique    Integer [INTEGER]Dues Paid   
  Decimal [Decimal]Date Dues Paid    Date [Date]
**There is a 
"relationship" between Basic.ID and Dues.ID
I can enter data into the Basic table but cannot enter data into the Dues table.
Can anyone help me?
Mary Lou
 

Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?

2015-03-25 Thread Kay Schenk
Dear all --

If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance with
tracking down our Windows buildbot problem. See our buildbot results
page -- http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/

Since rev. 1667884 (a possible result of making one thing right but
breaking something else), the win7 nightly has been failing.

If you are a windows builder, please update your source, and possibly do
a clean and reconfigure, and build. See what happens.

If your build is fine, report this.

If you get a failure, please do a clean, reconfigure and add the switch

"-- disable-gtk"

and see if this fixes the build problem.


Thanks for the help.


-- 
-
MzK

“What is the point of being alive if you don't
 at least  try to do something remarkable?”
   -- John Green, "An Abundance of Katherines"

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Issue 89232 - Fill operations should not touch filtered rows.

2015-03-25 Thread Riccardo Arzenton
The bug was reported and fixed long way ago, it reappered from OO 401.
If you have hidden cells, maybe hidded by a filter a drag fill should not alter 
these cells.

This is the correct behaviour adopted by ooo3.4, libreoffice, excel but not 
oo411.

So no way that's a WONT FIX, this is a bug, a critical one IMO.


- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Alexandro Colorado" 
A: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Inviato: Mercoledì, 25 marzo 2015 16:29:25
Oggetto: Re: Issue 89232 - Fill operations should not touch filtered rows.

On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 10:56:34 AM Riccardo Arzenton wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
> 
> Hi to all,
> 
> somebody could reopen this ticket? The problem is still present in AOO 411
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Honestly I dont see why this bug couldnt be an extension, doesnt need to be 
something done from source. 

Thischanges drastically the way filters are used IMO. Maybe this would be a 
WONT FIX. 

An extension could simply do conditional styles based on it intercepting the 
filtering results.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Issue 89232 - Fill operations should not touch filtered rows.

2015-03-25 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 10:56:34 AM Riccardo Arzenton wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
> 
> Hi to all,
> 
> somebody could reopen this ticket? The problem is still present in AOO 411
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Honestly I dont see why this bug couldnt be an extension, doesnt need to be 
something done from source. 

Thischanges drastically the way filters are used IMO. Maybe this would be a 
WONT FIX. 

An extension could simply do conditional styles based on it intercepting the 
filtering results. 

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Issue 89232 - Fill operations should not touch filtered rows.

2015-03-25 Thread Riccardo Arzenton

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89232

Hi to all,

somebody could reopen this ticket? The problem is still present in AOO 411

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [Pootle] Help to wrong webpage

2015-03-25 Thread FR web forum

>That wiki page is still reasonably accurate. Marcus' new page at
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/full_vs_lp.html
>is probably more complete though.

OK
Should we migrate this content into Wiki?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Source code build help

2015-03-25 Thread Buddhi Eashwarage
Can i know any links which shows unit tests directory?

Kind Regards,
Buddhi Eashwarage

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Buddhi Eashwarage 
wrote:

> Ok thanks.I'll check.
>
> Regards,
> Buddhi
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:07 PM, jan i  wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Buddhi Eashwarage 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Jan,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the reply.Now got clear that aoo is using java as well.So
>> you
>> > have mentioned it's using python too.I have used python for some
>> automation
>> > testings.Does AOO has automation testings as well?
>>
>>
>> Yes you can find a drectory named unittests, that contain a automated test
>> framework as wellas many test cases. This is however a bit old and could
>> do
>> with a makeover.
>>
>> rgds
>> jan i
>>
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > Buddhi Eashwarage
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:52 AM, jan i > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Buddhi Eashwarage > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello Dennis,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for your support on this question as well.Yeah i can add a QA
>> > view
>> > > > to this documentation.I want to clarify small thing.As i saw AOO
>> core
>> > is
>> > > > developed by C++.But i saw somewhere AOO use Java as well.Is that
>> > > correct.
>> > >
>> > > Yes the core is C++, but a lot of especially the API parts are Java.
>> When
>> > > you dig you also find a little bit Pyhon.
>> > >
>> > > rgds
>> > > jan I
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I can use a linux distribution such as Ubuntu.At the moment i
>> haven't
>> > > > installed a one.So i think linux environment will make this
>> easy.I'll
>> > try
>> > > > to install ubuntu.
>> > > >
>> > > > Kind Regards,
>> > > > Buddhi Eashwarage
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
>> > > > dennis.hamil...@acm.org  
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello Buddhi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think Regina or Ariel may have the information you require.
>> Also,
>> > > see
>> > > > > <
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO>,
>> > > > > <
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7
>> > > > >,
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > <
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Building_on_Windows
>> > > > > >.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think you have to build using CygWin and there are many
>> > dependencies
>> > > to
>> > > > > set up.
>> > > > > It would be good to apply a QA view to this and help to improve
>> the
>> > > > > documentation so beginners can be more successful [;<).  I am
>> slow at
>> > > > > this.  Tell me how I could help.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Dennis
>> > > > >
>> > > > > PS: I think the Windows build can be possible to use the new
>> Visual
>> > > > Studio
>> > > > > 2013 Community Edition to build, and use batch files within CygWin
>> > that
>> > > > can
>> > > > > also be used natively for command-line building.  (Community
>> Edition
>> > > > > apparently will not build for XP though.)  But the current
>> procedures
>> > > do
>> > > > > not support this and I have made poor progress on that.  This
>> could
>> > be
>> > > a
>> > > > > step toward being able to build 64-bit for Windows.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > > From: Buddhi Eashwarage [mailto:buddhie...@gmail.com
>> 
>> > ]
>> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:44
>> > > > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org  
>> > > > > Subject: Source code build help
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm working on AOO QA tasks.So i like to build the source code and
>> > > > > try.Specially i like to contribute on Writer application.So i
>> think
>> > in
>> > > > > eclipse i can build the code.Is it?And i'm using windows 7
>> > environment
>> > > at
>> > > > > the moment.If anyone can give me a small guide to that i admire
>> > it.Like
>> > > > to
>> > > > > say i'm from a development background, so i think i can catch it
>> > > easily.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Kind Regards,
>> > > > > Buddhi Eashwarage
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> -
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
>>
>
>