Re: Norwegian translation for website

2016-01-17 Thread Marcus
Am 01/17/2016 08:01 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 01/15/2016 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 01/14/2016 12:09 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 01/13/2016 11:59 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 13/01/2016 Marcus wrote: I've seen that

Re: Remove comments in English Dictionaries?

2016-01-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: I am writing to ask if it is okay for me to remove (hide) the comments in the English Dictionaries extension site. (Why is the QA list in the recipients? I'm putting l10n and QA in BCC, let's follow up on dev if needed) I prefer, as a user, to see comments on

Re: Norwegian translation for website

2016-01-17 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 01/15/2016 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus: > >> Am 01/14/2016 12:09 AM, schrieb Marcus: >> >>> Am 01/13/2016 11:59 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> On 13/01/2016 Marcus wrote: > I've seen that the CMS buildbot has

RE: Remove comments in English Dictionaries?

2016-01-17 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 about comments, etc. > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 14:54 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Remove comments in English Dictionaries? > > Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > > I am writing to ask if it is

Remove comments in English Dictionaries?

2016-01-17 Thread Marco A.G.Pinto
Hello! I am writing to ask if it is okay for me to remove (hide) the comments in the English Dictionaries extension site. This happens because I have just added the text to the description, below the visit the "Proofing Tool GUI project for help blah blah": "Or use the mailing lists." The

Re: Norwegian translation for website

2016-01-17 Thread Marcus
Am 01/15/2016 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 01/14/2016 12:09 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 01/13/2016 11:59 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 13/01/2016 Marcus wrote: I've seen that the CMS buildbot has still the faild build as last entry [1]. Have you got any response from Infra how and when to solve

Re: [REPORT] Issue Clearance Quality + Technical Debt

2016-01-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > [BCC to Project Management Committee and users@ oo.a.o] > > SUMMARY > > The top-level analysis of Bugzilla issue handling has been completed for all > issues opened on the project through December 31, 2015. > > The

RE: [REPORT] Issue Clearance Quality + Technical Debt

2016-01-17 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
FYI, the searches I've done for unresolved issues excludes all issues that have been identified as duplicates and those having any form of resolution, including being closed. It does not distinguish between unresolved extension requests and defect reports, and between unresolved confirmed and

Re: [REPORT] Issue Clearance Quality + Technical Debt

2016-01-17 Thread donaldupre .
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > [orcmid] > > I don't know. I haven't looked for such information and I am not aware of > any form it might be available in. > > Considering how different projects can be, I am not certain what lessons > might

Re: [REPORT] Issue Clearance Quality + Technical Debt

2016-01-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > FYI, the searches I've done for unresolved issues excludes all issues that > have been identified as duplicates and those having any form of resolution, > including being closed. It does not distinguish between