Re: Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"

[Mechtilde]

Hello
Do we have a test build for MacOSX 64 bit?

Then I will check it


Mechtilde

Am 25.09.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>> What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ?
> 
> IMHO Ariel should/could tell us what he has done with his Mac builds as
> the first positive verifications came with his builds [1]. I really hope
> he can. ;-)
> 
>> Empirically, it does not reproduce in 4.1.3. Do we have a definite patch
>> for it? Should I list it in the 4.1.3 release notes as having been fixed.
> 
> It depends on Ariel. If a fix is not known, then IMHO it's difficult to
> mark it this way when you cannot tell what was done. "Doesn't happen
> anymore" sounds better in the case that the fix is not known.
> 
> [1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622#c17
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
--
## Apache OpenOffice.org
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[DISCUSS] Draft 4.1.3 release notes

[Patricia Shanahan]

[Comments, suggestions, improvements welcome.]


Release Notes for Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3

General Remarks
===

Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 is a maintenance release incorporating security 
fixes, updated dictionaries, and build fixes.


A 4.1.2 regression, https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622, 
Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX, does not 
reproduce in 4.1.3.


The fix for security issue CVE-2016-1513, 
https://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2016-1513.html, previously 
only provided in source code and as a Hotfix patch, is incorporated in 
the 4.1.3 binary distribution.



Build Fixes
===

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127100 Make NSIS 3.* a build 
requirement for building Windows installers


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127119 configure does not 
check all Perl modules that are used at build time


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127120 Update code for 
downloading dependencies


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127118 Update dmake URL in 
configure


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127121 Update broken download 
URLs of external dependencies



Updated Dictionaries


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127112 Update bundled 
dictionaries for AOO 4.1.3 release


The updated dictionaries are for English, German, Dutch, French, 
Italian, Spanish, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, German (Austria), German 
(Switzerland), Khmer, Scottish Gaelic, Basque, Norwegian, Swedish, 
Portuguese (European), and Catalan.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

My Progress

[Alexander Hart]

I finished reading about how apache works.

My Progress

[Alexander Hart]

I am just starting level 1: How the apache openoffice project works

Re: Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"

[Marcus]

Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ?


IMHO Ariel should/could tell us what he has done with his Mac builds as 
the first positive verifications came with his builds [1]. I really hope 
he can. ;-)



Empirically, it does not reproduce in 4.1.3. Do we have a definite patch
for it? Should I list it in the 4.1.3 release notes as having been fixed.


It depends on Ariel. If a fix is not known, then IMHO it's difficult to 
mark it this way when you cannot tell what was done. "Doesn't happen 
anymore" sounds better in the case that the fix is not known.


[1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622#c17

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"

[Patricia Shanahan]

What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ?

Empirically, it does not reproduce in 4.1.3. Do we have a definite patch 
for it? Should I list it in the 4.1.3 release notes as having been fixed.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Marcus]

Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.


thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[Marcus]

Hi Dave,

in a previous mail this month you have written that you are available 
for help in case of topics that belogs to Sourceforge. Actually we have 
now a case that needs to be worked on on your side.


Like reported below they have a problem with redirected links from 
"templates.openoffice.org" that comes from a blocked user account.


It would be great if you can contact the support team of Formbirds.com 
to coordinate what could be done.


Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 09/25/2016 04:51 PM, schrieb Formsbirds:

Dear Webmaster,

I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my 
site - formsbirds.com or remove them completely.
We found thousands of links pointed to our site from templates.openoffice.org. 
The links are under an account named susie...@yandex.com.
This was caused by a SEO team we hired. We want to get our templates shared to 
more users via your site and hired a SEO team to upload our templates to your 
site. But they are too aggressive and put too many links inside.
Now we found thousands of backlinks from your site, which are actually bad to 
our site.
We have contacted the SEO team to remove the links under the user 
accountsusie...@yandex.com, while they told us the account had been blocked and 
they couldn't log in to delete the links.
We ask for the removal of all the links, or just add "nofollow" tag to those 
links pointed to our website from your side. You can still keep the documents that have 
uploaded at your website if those templates ate useful to users, but please delete the 
links pointed to our site.
Katie Williams
Formsbirds.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[Marcus]

Am 09/25/2016 07:11 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:



On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:


We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of
request.



More than that, the site looks like it has more than just the OP using it
for SEO. Read through the (presumably automated) postings on
twitter.com/aootemplates and there is a very troubling sequence of
unvarnished SEO/promo template postings. Looks to me like it needs some
sort of a review phase before new contributions are accepted.



Back in the great OpenOffice Retirement thread, we got an email from
Dave Brondsema, "Allura VP and employee at SourceForge", offering to
help with SourceForge contacts. See
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/854e93173cba65786e35588b2b00b4d9c5c383591a7ecf46aa3e16bd@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E


This might be the time to ask him for help? Perhaps Marcus as PMC Chair?


not a typical task for a chair. But I will connect both parties so that 
direct help is possible.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/25/2016 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/24/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:18 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:12 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

On 9/23/2016 1:00 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 09/23/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

- Source revision r1761818


Isn't this time to agree that this revision will be the one we
release?
Haven't seen any call from the RM, but it might be time to start
building it ;)

I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
other platforms.


@Patricia:
Maybe you can tell us what your further plan is. Do you have any other
fixes in mind?


2 persons with the same thought in the same minute. ;-)


No more fixes in mind, and I believe it has been built in each
environment, so I don't expect any more build fixes.

Time to create a release candidate.


great. I'll try to build 4.1.3 on Fedora 21 with the release options. Of
course it's not the official baseline system. But maybe good enough to
see if it's working.


I get a problem with ant:

Configure error message says the required version is >= 1.7.0.

ant is installed with version 1.9.4. So, newer than the required 1.7.0.
I've also set the symlink "ant -> /usr/bin/ant" and executing configure
includes the "--with-ant-home=$HOME/ant" option.

What else is needed to run configure successfully?


I don't know why but after starting over and prepared the build again,
it's now working.

Finally I got a AOO 4.1.3 with release options - but only en-US. I used
the following varaible + value in the build script:

LANG="de en-US fr pt ja"

OK, something for tomorrow.


the language option seems to be a problem with the build script:

Not OK:
--with-lang="${LANGS}"

OK:
--with-lang="de en-US fr pt ja"

BTW:
Ratscan shows the following files without correct header:
- main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set
- main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set.sh
- main/autom4te.cache/output.0
- main/autom4te.cache/requests
- main/autom4te.cache/traces.0
- main/config.log
- main/config.params
- main/configure
- main/warn


Something to add to "main/rat-excludes"?

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[Patricia Shanahan]

On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:


We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.



More than that, the site looks like it has more than just the OP using it
for SEO. Read through the (presumably automated) postings on
twitter.com/aootemplates and there is a very troubling sequence of
unvarnished SEO/promo template postings. Looks to me like it needs some
sort of a review phase before new contributions are accepted.



Back in the great OpenOffice Retirement thread, we got an email from 
Dave Brondsema, "Allura VP and employee at SourceForge", offering to 
help with SourceForge contacts. See 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/854e93173cba65786e35588b2b00b4d9c5c383591a7ecf46aa3e16bd@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E


This might be the time to ask him for help? Perhaps Marcus as PMC Chair?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[Simon Phipps]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:

> We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
> control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.


More than that, the site looks like it has more than just the OP using it
for SEO. Read through the (presumably automated) postings on
twitter.com/aootemplates and there is a very troubling sequence of
unvarnished SEO/promo template postings. Looks to me like it needs some
sort of a review phase before new contributions are accepted.

S.

Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[Patricia Shanahan]

We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct 
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.


On 9/25/2016 7:51 AM, Formsbirds wrote:

Dear Webmaster,

I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my 
site - formsbirds.com or remove them completely.
We found thousands of links pointed to our site from templates.openoffice.org. 
The links are under an account named susie...@yandex.com.
This was caused by a SEO team we hired. We want to get our templates shared to 
more users via your site and hired a SEO team to upload our templates to your 
site. But they are too aggressive and put too many links inside.
Now we found thousands of backlinks from your site, which are actually bad to 
our site.
We have contacted the SEO team to remove the links under the user 
accountsusie...@yandex.com, while they told us the account had been blocked and 
they couldn't log in to delete the links.
We ask for the removal of all the links, or just add "nofollow" tag to those 
links pointed to our website from your side. You can still keep the documents that have 
uploaded at your website if those templates ate useful to users, but please delete the 
links pointed to our site.
Katie Williams
Formsbirds.com






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[Formsbirds]

Dear Webmaster, 

I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my 
site - formsbirds.com or remove them completely. 
We found thousands of links pointed to our site from templates.openoffice.org. 
The links are under an account named susie...@yandex.com. 
This was caused by a SEO team we hired. We want to get our templates shared to 
more users via your site and hired a SEO team to upload our templates to your 
site. But they are too aggressive and put too many links inside. 
Now we found thousands of backlinks from your site, which are actually bad to 
our site.
We have contacted the SEO team to remove the links under the user 
accountsusie...@yandex.com, while they told us the account had been blocked and 
they couldn't log in to delete the links. 
We ask for the removal of all the links, or just add "nofollow" tag to those 
links pointed to our website from your side. You can still keep the documents 
that have uploaded at your website if those templates ate useful to users, but 
please delete the links pointed to our site. 
Katie Williams 
Formsbirds.com 

Testing 4.1.3

[Patricia Shanahan]

I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as 
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period 
until we have a complete release candidate.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Bootstrap fails

[Aleksandr Andreev]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
 wrote:
> It's OK; I just asked because I haven't seen this error before on trunk;
> it seems some Ubuntu specific problem
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags
> there, it suggested to add -fno-stack-protector or -nostdlib.
>

Do these flags need to be passed to build or to configure?

Aleksandr

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Bootstrap fails

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:51:44AM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
> Hello Ariel,
> 
> On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile" 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This looks the build bot error:
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
> >
> > Are you building trunk or a branch?
> >
> 
> I was trying to build trunk. Is that not the right course of action?

It's OK; I just asked because I haven't seen this error before on trunk;
it seems some Ubuntu specific problem
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags
there, it suggested to add -fno-stack-protector or -nostdlib.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bootstrap fails

[Aleksandr Andreev]

Hello Ariel,

On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile" 
wrote:
>
>
> This looks the build bot error:
>
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>
> Are you building trunk or a branch?
>

I was trying to build trunk. Is that not the right course of action?

Aleksandr

Re: Bootstrap fails

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

Hi Aleksandr,

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:05:55PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
> The build fails on Linux Mint 17.1 with the following messages:
> 
> [ build LNK ] Library/passwordcontainer.uno.so
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS): In
> function `__stack_chk_fail_local':
> (.text+0x10): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make: *** 
> [/home/vlad/aoo/main/solver/420/unxlngi6.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/passwordcontainer.uno.so]
> Error 1
> dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'
> 
> 1 module(s):
> svl
> need(s) to be rebuilt
> 
> Reason(s):
> 
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/vlad/aoo/main/svl/prj
> 
> Any suggestions?

This looks the build bot error:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt

Are you building trunk or a branch?


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: How do all the binaries get built?

[Marcus]

Am 09/23/2016 08:41 PM, schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Just a FYI that I now have 4 build VMs available that I will
use: OSX 10.11/Xcode 7.3.1, Ubuntu 14.04/64bit, CentOS5.11/64bit
and CentOS5.11/32bit.

So far, successful builds on OSX and the 64bit Ubuntu and CentOS5
VMs; haven't tried the 32bit one yet.


that's fantastic. Thanks for your work.

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries

[Marcus]

I hope it's not too late. But it should be also a normal thing:

Please take care that the naming structure for dirs and files is exactly 
the same like for the other 4.1.x releases. The only difference should 
be the version number. But what I've seen from the commits so far looks 
good.


Otherwise it won't work together with the download webpage. ;-)

Thanks

Marcus



Am 09/25/2016 04:48 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 09:25:16AM +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:




-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 9:01 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries

Hi there,

IIRC we used to upload the packages to our home directory at
people.apache.org, once there I don't recall what the RM did until the
packages ended on the subversion dist repo.

Where should we upload the binaries now?


The normal place is

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

 From there the RM can just 'svn mv' them from 'dev' to 'release'


OK. So I started playing (do not get nervous, just with 4 files). This
is my experiment:

"svn mv" needs a working copy, so you need to checkout the repo, but there
is no need to checkout the whole repo. Using
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.sparsedirs.html you can
do the following:


svn co --depth immediates https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
cd dist/
svn up --set-depth immediates dev
svn up --set-depth immediates dev/openoffice
svn up --set-depth immediates release
svn up --set-depth immediates release/openoffice


If different committers are going to upload different binaries, it seems
better to use svn import instead of checking out and then committing;
for example:

svn import \
 -m "Prepare 4.1.3 release" \
 --username arielch \
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc \
 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ast/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc

(right now I checked these 4 files under dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2 in
order to test svn mv 4.1.2 4.1.3 with my previous sparse-dirs checkout).

If someone knows a better way of doing this, please share it :)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org