Re: Jim's Windows7 issues solved!?

Do we need an update to the instructions to clarify that? On 11/22/2017 12:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think I finally tracked down the problem w/ my Win7/cygwin build problems. It was subtle. I kept all my sources in /home/jim/src/asf/AOO415 that is, it lived under the cygwin

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

And in honor of the (US) Holiday, I am uploading to http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Windows builds for 4.1.5 (just the subset of langs). This not only allows for tests of 4.1.5 for Windows users but also that my Windows build setup is (finally) viable! Cheers!

Jim's Windows7 issues solved!?

I think I finally tracked down the problem w/ my Win7/cygwin build problems. It was subtle. I kept all my sources in /home/jim/src/asf/AOO415 that is, it lived under the cygwin file-system. What I discovered is that the source actually needs to live under C:, e.g.: C:/jim/src/asf/AOO415

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

Am 22.11.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I don't think we should wait for more development before releasing fixes for the 4.1.4 regressions. If 4.2.0 needs another month or so of development, I'm in favor of releasing 4.1.5 as soon as we can get the various bug reports checked against

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

I don't think we should wait for more development before releasing fixes for the 4.1.4 regressions. If 4.2.0 needs another month or so of development, I'm in favor of releasing 4.1.5 as soon as we can get the various bug reports checked against it. On a side note, for those living outside the

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Regarding 4.2.0. What are the new features and is everything being worked > into trunk complete? If we were to decide to release it “quickly” what > needs to be done? > I don't recommend releasing 4.2.0 immediately;

Re: AOO auf der ORR und der T-DOSE - Bericht

Hallo Michael, Die OpenRheinRuhr lag ja von Köln aus sozusagen auf dem Rückweg für mich. Danke nochmal für die aufschlussreichen Gespräche. Bis zur FOSDEM habe ich dann auch den neuen Demo-PC fertig und an euch versandt. Gruß, Matthias Am 20.11.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

We have regressions in 4.1.4. Until we get a fix out in either 4.2.0 or 4.1.5 we will continue to get bug reports. These will distract our volunteers and impact our users. We owe it to our users to be quick. Regarding 4.2.0. What are the new features and is everything being worked into trunk

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

I think to use 4.2.0 directly is causing less regression then to backport a subset of fixes on the 4.1.x tree and then test for regressions. If the fix is indeed successfull with the build changes, we should release the new build, and go on. Am 22. November 2017 13:05:14 MEZ schrieb Patricia

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

> > > > > > > > > We have buildbots building 4.1.4 every week... > > > > > > > > In my opinion that is a waste of electric power and computing > > > resources > > > > > Well, it is important for the release process, but 4.1.4 is out > > now... >

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

Am 22.11.2017 um 15:17 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > > >> We have buildbots building 4.1.4 every week... >> > > In my opinion that is a waste of electric power and computing resources Well, it is important for the release process, but 4.1.4 is out now... > > >> Would it make sense to

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

Hi Matthias, all > We have buildbots building 4.1.4 every week... > In my opinion that is a waste of electric power and computing resources > Would it make sense to switch them to 4.1.5? > That would make a little more sense... It should be enough to change the Snap buildbots that are

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

We have buildbots building 4.1.4 every week... Would it make sense to switch them to 4.1.5? Regards, Matthias Am 22.11.2017 um 13:31 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > What's the alternative to going to 4.2.0? > > I only test trunk. So it's 4.1.x that lacks testing from me. > > We also really should

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

What's the alternative to going to 4.2.0? I only test trunk. So it's 4.1.x that lacks testing from me. We also really should start running the various tests and comparing results from trunk against 4.1's. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I see

Re: [Issue 127601] New: DDE Fields

I cannot reproduce the issue with 4.1.5 dev-build. my system: Windows 7 Prof. AOO415m1(Build:9789) - Rev. 1815796 2017-11-21 09:03 - Developer Build I have attached my test files in Bugzilla: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127601 Jörg

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

I see 4.1.5-dev as a device for testing whether a bug is due to a specific problem. That change is already checked in to the trunk. We still have to decide whether to go straight to 4.2.0. The upside is, as Damjam points out, that we need to get the general benefits of 4.2 out in the field.

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

Thank you, but when are these 4.1.x releases going to stop? We have so much lined up for 4.2.0. Damjan On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I have both macOS and Linux-64bit builds of 4.1.5-dev (HEAD on the > AOO415 branch) available for fun and games (and