works for me :)
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Marcus write:
>> No further opinions? Come on :-)
>
> More or less, my opinion is the same as yours: we can't use "trunk" since
> trunk is a moving target ("trunk" today is something different than "trunk"
> in a few
Marcus write:
No further opinions? Come on :-)
More or less, my opinion is the same as yours: we can't use "trunk"
since trunk is a moving target ("trunk" today is something different
than "trunk" in a few months). I think we used codes such as 4.2.0-dev
and this should be the way to go, so
No further opinions? Come on :-)
Marcus
Am 19.01.19 um 12:11 schrieb Marcus:
Am 19.01.19 um 09:39 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Maybe a version trunk would help?
before I spent 30 minutes to update all the products in BZ with a new
version let me summarize what we have and what is really needed:
With the links [1] and [2] I can download the installation files for SK
language. Maybe it's just a temporary download or Internet problem and
you can try later again.
[1]
Problem description
there is a broken link when trying to download SK language (either full
program or just language pack). This was on Windows 10 Pro.
(What does not work? What do you expect?)
Browser variables
Values
navigator.appCodeName
Mozilla
navigator.appName
Netscape
navigator.appVersion
EPM 3.7 is very, very old, and useless for macOS. However, the
later version of EPM, which do allow macOS to be built, don't have
the required AOO patches in them.
So what I've done is pulled the latest EPM version (4.4.1), added the
AOO patches back in, and released this as 4.4.2:
Am 24.01.19 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> This looks like it's because the EPM was not built patched for AOO...
>
> Did you use 4.4.2? And add --enable-aoo ?
I use 4.4.1 with --enable-aoo. This was the link you gave me.
I will try it with 4.4.2 this evening.
Kind regards
--
Mechtilde
This looks like it's because the EPM was not built patched for AOO...
Did you use 4.4.2? And add --enable-aoo ?
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 1:41 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Now I built on CentOS 7 again with out success.
>
> I used the recent epm version as mentioned in the wiki and a
The current 4.2.x test builds were done w/ an unpatched EPM. All later ones
will use a patched version.
> On Jan 23, 2019, at 5:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/19 7:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I've uploaded the latest test builds for macOS and Linux 64.
>> These are based on
