Marcus write:
No further opinions? Come on :-)
More or less, my opinion is the same as yours: we can't use "trunk" since trunk is a moving target ("trunk" today is something different than "trunk" in a few months). I think we used codes such as 4.2.0-dev and this should be the way to go, so 4.3.0-dev would be a natural choice. Of course, we might want to use different numbers in future, but for the moment this is better than a generic "trunk".
Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
