Re: Google+ going away on April 2, 2019
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 15:41 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Kay, > > Am 25.02.19 um 00:24 schrieb Kay Schenk: > > > > On 2/24/19 12:59 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Kay, Hi Keith, > >> > >> Am 05.02.19 um 00:58 schrieb Kay Schenk: > >>> On 2/2/19 11:07 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 2/2/2019 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > I'm assuming most of you know that Google+ is going away April 2. > > 2019. > > I am one of the moderators for the AOO group. Here is information I > > just > > received. I know MANY are disappointed by this decision, and we > > need to > > discuss what to do with the current AOO information. > > > Hi Kay; > > Yes we should definitely make an archive of Google+ pages, just not > sure > where the best place for them to be stored would be. > > Regards > Keith > > >>> I'm looking into HOW to get the data from G+. It might be nice > >>> (somehow) to import the G+ postings into FB, but the participant info > >>> wouldn't sync that's for sure. I'll do a dump from G+ soon and see > >>> what the feeds/post look like. > > OK. That would be great. I don't do much programming of late. We MAY > > be able to use one of their APIs (not investigated yet!) to do SOMETHING. > >> You may already have found the way to archive Google+ content: > >> https://takeout.google.com/ > > > > Yes, I have seen this. I've done nothing yet. I should get to doing an > > archive this week sometime. > > > > > >> > >> It took Google about one week to provide my zip file. > > > > GEE WHIZ! That's kind of unbelievable. > > > > > >> > >> I am also wondering about our YouTube channel. It is linked to the > >> Google+ brand account, so I have administrative rights. But since I am > >> not the owner I can not add another administrator/moderator. > > > > YouTube is NOT being affected as far as I know. > > YouTube itself is not affected. But the right management is linked with > Googles brand accounts. > And "our" brand account is owned by Ariel Constenla-Haile. > > So I will still be able to administrate our Channel but I can't do > anything beyond that. > And I will be the only one who has access. > > Regards, > >Matthias > Got it. > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Matthias > > Thanks for looking into this. > >> > >>> -- > >>> MzK > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > >
Re: Google+ going away on April 2, 2019
Hi Kay, Am 25.02.19 um 00:24 schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On 2/24/19 12:59 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Kay, Hi Keith, >> >> Am 05.02.19 um 00:58 schrieb Kay Schenk: >>> On 2/2/19 11:07 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 2/2/2019 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I'm assuming most of you know that Google+ is going away April 2. > 2019. > I am one of the moderators for the AOO group. Here is information I > just > received. I know MANY are disappointed by this decision, and we > need to > discuss what to do with the current AOO information. > Hi Kay; Yes we should definitely make an archive of Google+ pages, just not sure where the best place for them to be stored would be. Regards Keith >>> I'm looking into HOW to get the data from G+. It might be nice >>> (somehow) to import the G+ postings into FB, but the participant info >>> wouldn't sync that's for sure. I'll do a dump from G+ soon and see >>> what the feeds/post look like. > OK. That would be great. I don't do much programming of late. We MAY > be able to use one of their APIs (not investigated yet!) to do SOMETHING. >> You may already have found the way to archive Google+ content: >> https://takeout.google.com/ > > Yes, I have seen this. I've done nothing yet. I should get to doing an > archive this week sometime. > > >> >> It took Google about one week to provide my zip file. > > GEE WHIZ! That's kind of unbelievable. > > >> >> I am also wondering about our YouTube channel. It is linked to the >> Google+ brand account, so I have administrative rights. But since I am >> not the owner I can not add another administrator/moderator. > > YouTube is NOT being affected as far as I know. YouTube itself is not affected. But the right management is linked with Googles brand accounts. And "our" brand account is owned by Ariel Constenla-Haile. So I will still be able to administrate our Channel but I can't do anything beyond that. And I will be the only one who has access. Regards, Matthias > >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias > Thanks for looking into this. >> >>> -- >>> MzK >>> >>> >>> >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Google+ going away on April 2, 2019
On 2/24/19 12:59 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Kay, Hi Keith, Am 05.02.19 um 00:58 schrieb Kay Schenk: On 2/2/19 11:07 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 2/2/2019 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: I'm assuming most of you know that Google+ is going away April 2. 2019. I am one of the moderators for the AOO group. Here is information I just received. I know MANY are disappointed by this decision, and we need to discuss what to do with the current AOO information. Hi Kay; Yes we should definitely make an archive of Google+ pages, just not sure where the best place for them to be stored would be. Regards Keith I'm looking into HOW to get the data from G+. It might be nice (somehow) to import the G+ postings into FB, but the participant info wouldn't sync that's for sure. I'll do a dump from G+ soon and see what the feeds/post look like. OK. That would be great. I don't do much programming of late. We MAY be able to use one of their APIs (not investigated yet!) to do SOMETHING. You may already have found the way to archive Google+ content: https://takeout.google.com/ Yes, I have seen this. I've done nothing yet. I should get to doing an archive this week sometime. It took Google about one week to provide my zip file. GEE WHIZ! That's kind of unbelievable. I am also wondering about our YouTube channel. It is linked to the Google+ brand account, so I have administrative rights. But since I am not the owner I can not add another administrator/moderator. YouTube is NOT being affected as far as I know. Regards, Matthias Thanks for looking into this. -- MzK - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Google+ going away on April 2, 2019
Hi Kay, Hi Keith, Am 05.02.19 um 00:58 schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On 2/2/19 11:07 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 2/2/2019 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> I'm assuming most of you know that Google+ is going away April 2. 2019. >>> I am one of the moderators for the AOO group. Here is information I >>> just >>> received. I know MANY are disappointed by this decision, and we need to >>> discuss what to do with the current AOO information. >>> >> Hi Kay; >> >> Yes we should definitely make an archive of Google+ pages, just not sure >> where the best place for them to be stored would be. >> >> Regards >> Keith >> > > I'm looking into HOW to get the data from G+. It might be nice > (somehow) to import the G+ postings into FB, but the participant info > wouldn't sync that's for sure. I'll do a dump from G+ soon and see > what the feeds/post look like. You may already have found the way to archive Google+ content: https://takeout.google.com/ It took Google about one week to provide my zip file. I am also wondering about our YouTube channel. It is linked to the Google+ brand account, so I have administrative rights. But since I am not the owner I can not add another administrator/moderator. Regards, Matthias > -- > MzK > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: error on MWiki link
Peter/Matthias,
the used template is: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Template:Uno/UDKlink
This contains a hardcoded link:
[http://{{{2|udk}}}.openoffice.org/source/browse/{{{2|udk}}}/{{{1}}}
{{{2|udk}}}/{{{1}}}][[Category:Wiki Templates]]
I suppose that the path to /source/browse no longer exists.
Can't find anything that looks like it
--
DiGro
___
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.6 (Dutch) and scanned with Ziggo Safe Online (F-Secure)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: extensions description xml doesn't exist
All extensions are now at https://extensions.openoffice.org/ If your extension is hosted at the new address maybe it needs a little URL editing Hope this helps... > On February 24, 2019 at 1:07 PM John D'Orazio < > john.dora...@cappellaniauniroma3.org > mailto:john.dora...@cappellaniauniroma3.org > wrote: > > > Today I was rebuilding an extension I had written 4 years ago, and I just > happened to look at the "Retriever Output" window in Netbeans, and I found > this error: > > 23-feb-2019 19.14.23 : Retrieving Location: > http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 > Error: File not found in the specified address : > http://www.openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 > > > If I try to navigate to http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 > I > get a "page not found". > > In the wiki the only reference is to this page: > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements > > Should this xml descriptor still exist in this location? > > John R. D'Orazio >
Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?
Hi Jim and all, As mentioned before, I think we need some more time before doing a (public) beta. But I also want to get a wider user base for testing and something "official" we can base our discussions on. So here is my proposal: We could create a tag (snapshot420 or whatever) and build it as a developer snapshot. This can be done similar to a beta with the build targets: openofficedev, ooodevlanguagepack and sdkoodev. We also have a special splashscreen for a "Developer Snapshot": http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO42X/main/ooo_custom_images/dev/introabout/intro.png I would like to have all recent translations committed and merged before we create the tag. March would be a good time, so we could also include the updated English dictionary. The build should be uploaded to an official place together with all hashes and PGP signatures. It could be announced with a blog post linked on our homepage. Opinions? Regards, Matthias Am 18.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Release, as in GA, or release as in Beta? > >> On Feb 15, 2019, at 4:55 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> Bug 125129 looks like a wild goose chase and requires considerable >> understanding of the framework layer, but I'll try continue when I have >> time. >> >> My own release checklist would include: >> 1. Library audit. >> 1.1 Did we lose or gain any public symbols in our libraries since the >> 4.1.0? Gbuild requires explicit export instead of exporting everything and >> then possibly controlling visibility with a .map file, so it's very >> possible. >> 1.2 Did ELF symbol versions on *nix platforms change? The older gbuild >> modules probably did, as I didn't understand the meaning of .map files back >> then. >> 1.3 Are the same libraries with the same names available in both 4.1.0 and >> 4.2.0? >> 2. Base: >> 2.1 Complete the Java SDBC driver framework, used by both the new SDBC-JDBC >> bridge and the Postgres SDBC driver. >> 2.2 Audit the new SDBC-JDBC bridge in Java against the old C++ one, fix any >> differences. >> 2.3 Complete the Postgres SDBC driver; still needs views, users, groups, >> etc. >> 2.4 Complete the integration of the Postgres SDBC driver into the Base UI >> forms (like MySQL already is). >> 3. Crashreporter >> 3.1 Get it working again. >> 3.2 Bug reported in UI form (instead of submitted to some now obsolete >> server), which can be copied/pasted or attached to Bugzilla. >> 4. Testing >> 4.1 Run all available tests (unit tests, smoketest, module integration >> tests, bvt, fvt, etc.) against 4.1.0 and 4.2.0, find and fix any >> regressions. >> >> Damjan >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 1:25 AM Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> IMO, the situation hasn't changed so much. >>> >>> We should at least fix issue 125129 [1] before we release a (public) >>> beta. I have seen that Damjan is investigating... >>> >>> Then we need time to inform translators on l10n@ before we can export >>> the latest translations from Pootle. >>> At the moment most of them are at 98% for the UI but the SDF files still >>> need to be updated in source. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> [1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129 >>> >>> >>> Am 14.02.19 um 17:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Time for another ping... what does everyone think? Time? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
extensions description xml doesn't exist
Today I was rebuilding an extension I had written 4 years ago, and I just happened to look at the "Retriever Output" window in Netbeans, and I found this error: 23-feb-2019 19.14.23 : Retrieving Location: http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 Error: File not found in the specified address : http://www.openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 If I try to navigate to http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 I get a "page not found". In the wiki the only reference is to this page: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements Should this xml descriptor still exist in this location? John R. D'Orazio
Re: error on MWiki link
Hi Peter, Am 24.02.19 um 01:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > I see. Looks like a template error. Where can I fix those? I think you are speaking of: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/External/Modules/stlport Yes, the link seems to be generated by a template, but I don't know how to fix it. Regards, Matthias > > On 24.02.19 00:58, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 24.02.19 um 00:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The wiki can not resolve following link: >>> >>> http://external.openoffice.org/source/browse/external/stlport >> Maybe this should point to: >> >> https://www.openoffice.org/external/forms/stlport.html >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> I think we had not that as a report. Where should I note this down? >>> >>> >>> All the Best >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
