cbmarcum opened a new pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115
This work is for flaky BVT tests that randomly pass or fail during multiple
runs against the same build.
Basically I'm adding a thread sleep prior to the test assertion check.
So far this has
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/3#issuecomment-753690953
You could do that for the other pages as well...
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
jimjag merged pull request #116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/116
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
cbmarcum merged pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
cbmarcum merged pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jimjag merged pull request #116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/116
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
DiGro opened a new pull request #117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/117
[:space:] should represent any whitespace character in regular expressions.
However, in the older, before OOo 3.4, it did not find the tab \t.
Now it does due to changing the regexp engine
cbmarcum commented on pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115#issuecomment-757522715
The reason was technical. My belief is the tests were passing and failing
randomly either from threading issues or processor speeds that didn't exist
when they were created.
leginee commented on pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115#issuecomment-757465959
I checked through the code and for me it is fine. I have a question thought.
The assert call had always a parameter as a implicit nested Function. and
you broke that up, by
ardovm opened a new pull request #119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/119
It is possible that `$OUTPATH` directories are left by previous compilation
attempts.
A proof that `$OUTPATH` directories are used is the Perl script
DiGro opened a new pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/pull/1
Line 223 ; "contributers" should be spelled with an "o" : Changed to
"contributors"
This is an automated message from the Apache
DiGro closed pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/pull/1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/pull/1#issuecomment-761868165
Has this ever been merged?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
JuanJ67m opened a new pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120
Actually, Excel is the main worksheet for and construction and I think
OpenOffice could same, creating nodes for Dynamo BIM nodes to interconnect with
Privative software, Pyflow nodes to
ardovm edited a comment on pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/32#issuecomment-759661243
@oooforum if you could follow the discussion on the BugZilla report, this
"exchange" of auto-grow height and auto-grow size may be intentional.
If it was so, then this
ardovm commented on pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/32#issuecomment-759661243
@oooforum if you could follow the discussion on the BugZilla report, this
"crossing" of auto-grow height and auto-grow size may be intentional.
If it was so, then this PR
DiGro opened a new pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/pull/2
Line 223 : "contributers" should be "contributors". Changed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
DiGro closed pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/pull/2
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
DiGro commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/pull/1#issuecomment-762174709
@Pilot-Pirx,
Matthias, I'm still struggling with Git.
Didn't get the change merged.
Dave has however made the change for me, so all is well
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/2
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
oooforum opened a new pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/2
Change URL to restore the Basic picture
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
oooforum opened a new pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/3
Add charset to show these characters
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/3
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
ne-oss opened a new pull request #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/114
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
knmc closed pull request #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/114
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/114#issuecomment-753512206
This one does not look like a reasonable PR...
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Grosskopf commented on pull request #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/112#issuecomment-746000980
> If not needed I would would opt that the dead code is removed. :) Can you
remove it? or should I check how I can incorporate this wish?
I think I did remove it, is
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-770998849
Any objections against merging this PR?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
ardovm commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568450657
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -414,18 +410,18 @@ SW_DLLPUBLIC SwRead SwGetReaderXML();
// END source/filter/basflt/fltini.cxx
-extern
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568383955
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -414,18 +410,18 @@ SW_DLLPUBLIC SwRead SwGetReaderXML();
// END source/filter/basflt/fltini.cxx
-extern
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568382378
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -367,32 +363,32 @@ public:
void SetBaseURL( const String& rURL );
sal_Bool IsOld() const;
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568382378
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -367,32 +363,32 @@ public:
void SetBaseURL( const String& rURL );
sal_Bool IsOld() const;
ardovm commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568367773
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -414,18 +410,18 @@ SW_DLLPUBLIC SwRead SwGetReaderXML();
// END source/filter/basflt/fltini.cxx
-extern
ardovm commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r568367366
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -367,32 +363,32 @@ public:
void SetBaseURL( const String& rURL );
sal_Bool IsOld() const;
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118#issuecomment-767530852
If there are no objections I will merge this code later this day.
This is an automated message from the
ardovm commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565566978
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -106,11 +105,11 @@ public:
};
/ SwReader/Reader /
-// Basisklasse
JuanJ67m commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120#issuecomment-767781863
>
>
> What should this PR do?!
> The same was opened in LO and is now closed.
> I don't see any value here.
was reopened
JuanJ67m commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120#issuecomment-767782309
>
>
> I think it is a feature request, but I am unsure what to do with it.
create nodes to allow connect to others FOSS.
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120#issuecomment-767800130
> > What should this PR do?!
> > The same was opened in LO and is now closed.
> > I don't see any value here.
>
> was reopened
Yes, from you!
I am sure
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120#issuecomment-767659572
What should this PR do?!
The same was opened in LO and is now closed.
I don't see any value here.
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
leginee commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120#issuecomment-767680908
I think it is a feature request, but I am unsure what to do with it.
This is an automated message from the
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565603678
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -367,32 +363,32 @@ public:
void SetBaseURL( const String& rURL );
sal_Bool IsOld() const;
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565603037
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -161,32 +160,32 @@ class SwReader: public SwDocFac
SvStream* pStrm;
SotStorageRef pStg;
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565606170
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -414,18 +410,18 @@ SW_DLLPUBLIC SwRead SwGetReaderXML();
// END source/filter/basflt/fltini.cxx
-extern
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565602584
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -106,11 +105,11 @@ public:
};
/ SwReader/Reader /
-//
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565607126
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -501,32 +497,32 @@ public:
const String& GetBaseURL() const { return sBaseURL;}
-// suche
leginee commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#discussion_r565606703
##
File path: main/sw/inc/shellio.hxx
##
@@ -501,32 +497,32 @@ public:
const String& GetBaseURL() const { return sBaseURL;}
-// suche
leginee commented on pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121#issuecomment-768553149
Thank you for the quick review. I have some really bad mistakes there.
This is an automated message from the
leginee opened a new pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/121
Translation of some german comments of the interface.
Please review and see if you understand those and check for spelling errors.
Thanks.
I hope this will help to improve the way we read
ardovm merged pull request #119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/119
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
jimjag commented on pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109#issuecomment-771795889
LGTM
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109#issuecomment-771809139
I will merge it then... ;-)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109#issuecomment-771791487
Did anyone have the time to have a look at this PR?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120#issuecomment-771823586
Merging AOO42X into trunk does not sound like a good idea...
However, if you have a feature request, feel free to discuss it on
dev@openoffice.apache.org.
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/120
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
DonLewisFreeBSD commented on pull request #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/100#issuecomment-862048099
> So basically, we are waiting for someone to do a build for macOS?
Pretty much, although I think someone reported problems with signature
verification on MacOS
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/15
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
ardovm opened a new pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133
The flag is set by default by the graphite configure script, but it lets the
compilation fail with gcc 7.5
The compilation of the graphite module is consistently failing on openSUSE
Leap 15.2
leginee commented on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864492889
The meaing of the Flag is
-Werror: every warning is treated as an error.
Since Grafite is a dependency it is fine to build without. However Imho we
should strife for
leginee commented on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864513194
Then we have 2 choices. Fix the Issues or prepare the switch to a
replacement.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
DonLewisFreeBSD commented on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864508440
> The meaing of the Flag is
> -Werror: every warning is treated as an error.
>
> Since Grafite is a dependency it is fine to build without. However Imho we
ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285
The first two warnings are IMHO bugs. The first one is a function parameter
type `bool` instead of `bool&` and the second is a mixup of return values in a
`switch`
ardovm commented on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285
The first two warnings are IMHO bugs. The first one is a function parameter
type `bool` instead of `bool&` and the second is a mixup of return values in a
`switch` statement.
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #48:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/48
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
tigran54 opened a new pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/56
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/55
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/56#issuecomment-865162469
Again, a new pull request is not needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
tigran54 opened a new pull request #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/55
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/56
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #49:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/49
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/56#issuecomment-865162469
Again, a new pull request is not needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/55
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #49:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/49
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/56
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #48:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/48
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
tigran54 opened a new pull request #48:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/48
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 opened a new pull request #49:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/49
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 opened a new pull request #50:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/50
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 opened a new pull request #51:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/51
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 opened a new pull request #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/52
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 opened a new pull request #53:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/53
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 opened a new pull request #54:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/54
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #51:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/51
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
ardovm opened a new pull request #132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/132
This PR aims to solve bug 128453: a new security warning is being displayed
also when it is not necessary.
This PR is against branch AOO41X because I started from there. After we
merge it I
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/100#issuecomment-861586442
If a signed document is needed to verify, feel free to take this one:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/Signiert.odt
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/100#issuecomment-861551203
So basically, we are waiting for someone to do a build for macOS?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
cbmarcum commented on pull request #132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/132#issuecomment-860107186
Based on the positive test results on the dev@ list I'm going to merge this
in.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
cbmarcum merged pull request #132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/132
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/19
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
tigran54 opened a new pull request #20:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/20
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
tigran54 closed pull request #22:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/22
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #20:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/20
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #23:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/23
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #20:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/20#issuecomment-840658367
Closing this one as obsolete.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
tigran54 opened a new pull request #22:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/22
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/21#issuecomment-840644628
No need to open a second pull request, just work on the first one.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Pilot-Pirx closed pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/21
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
201 - 300 of 726 matches
Mail list logo
