Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

a basis for refreshed code and translations. >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>>> Keith >>>> >>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>> >>>>&g

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

What is wrong w/ using the build stuff that we have used for years? > On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Dear All, > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I just committed the "catalina" branch: >> https://github.com/apa

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for. > On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Arrigo Marchiori > wrote: > > Hello Jim, > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:14:03AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> What is wrong w/ using the build stuff

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > People need macOS builds more frequently to test. > Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that people want to hold off...

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

Snapshot works for me > On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm ready for a dev3... > > That's great! > > Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we wa

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very, very platform and SDK sensitive. Someone remind me what the catalina branch is and how it relates to trunk and AOO42X, please :-) > On Jul 27, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello All, > > resurrecting a

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

;>> Next weekend? Any idea? >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>>>> Hello All, >

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

Hmmm... this seems to indicate that it is something in the UNO code itself which may be the issue, and specifically about exception handling... possibly some weirdness in the assembly part. That narrows things down... great work Arrigo! ---

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I missing something? > On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 03.08.21 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

It does... > On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:25 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 03.08.21 um 19:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I >> missing something? > > Yes, we had this problem

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works? diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx index dc67c5dc58..97c4d080f4 100644 --- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx +++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelpe

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Jim, > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works? >> >> diff --git a/main/comphelper/i

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

> On Aug 4, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Jim, > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:09:11AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >>> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Jim, >>> &g

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx index dc67c5dc58..8ea41ec95f 100644 --- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx +++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx @@ -131,16 +131,22 @@ inline sal_Bool SAL_CALL extractInterface

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

Can you try this: diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644 --- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx +++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx @@ -131,9 +131,10 @@ inline sal_Bool SAL_CAL

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX! diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644 --- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx +++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx @@ -131,9 +131,

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-) > On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Ready, when you are! ;-) > > Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: &g

AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > That's c9282f5c5c ? Yep. That's right! > > Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only > single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. > Yikes!

devtools

Our devtools repo is till under svn; should we switch it to git. It would be nice, I think, to use on version control implementation for all our code related repos. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: OpenOffice 4.1.10 crashes when loading .odm file

I'm not getting that crash, even after scrolling thru the doc, resizing the window, etc... > On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > thanks for trying. > > I also see this window, but after a few more seconds OpenOffice crashes. > I figured out OpenOffice up to

Re: devtools

eserved. > > Of course there would be wiki and webpages to update. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug 6, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Our devtools repo is till under svn; should we switch it to git. It would >> be nice, I think, to use on ver

Re: svn commit: r49231 - /dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/en-US/

I am uploading both the regular and the ./Dev/ builds... just in case there is something in the Dev builds themselves which causes issues > On Aug 6, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Sorry, these are NOT Dev builds, compare to Dev2: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos

Re: OpenOffice 4.1.10 crashes when loading .odm file

Can you try this version: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_Dev_4.2.0_MacOS_x86-64_install_de.dmg > On Aug 6, 2021, at 4:37 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: > > Hi, > > I just updated my system to macOS 11.5.1 and reinstalled OpenOffice

Re: OpenOffice 4.1.10 crashes when loading .odm file

The Crash Report indicates that it is the Check For Updates function that causes the problem. Some weirdness with serf and SSL certs. libnss3 -> libsmime -> libnssutil3 -> libplds4 > On Aug 6, 2021, at 6:04 PM, Bouschen, Michael > wrote: > >

Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

s and hashes on the Apache server? > > Matthias > > Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> >>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> That's c9282f5c5c ? >> Yep. That's right! >>>

Availability of Apache OpenOffice 4.2.0-Dev3(m3) developer test builds

an be found at: o https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/ Thank you! -- Jim Jagielski, on behalf of the AOO PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional com

Re: devtools

Any other opinions or comments? > On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > To me, it being within OpenOffice.git makes the most sense... but I'm fine > either way ;) > >> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Within /Apac

Re: Test builds AOO 4.1.11

Should I do macOS and Linux ones as well? > On Aug 19, 2021, at 7:06 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just uploaded new AOO4111 Test Builds for Windows: > > https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/ > > Feedback is welcome! > > Regards, > >Matthias > >

Re: Test builds AOO 4.1.11

HEAD on origin/AOO41X? > On Aug 19, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 19.08.21 um 15:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Should I do macOS and Linux ones as well? > > I think that would be great! > > Regards, > >Matth

Re: Test builds AOO 4.1.11

And the macOS, Linux64 and Linux32 bit builds can be found at: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.1.11-test/ Cheers! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

I believe the fix, which is universal, is already folded into the repos > On Aug 25, 2021, at 5:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Am 06.08.21 um 12:26 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello Jim, All, >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 05, 202

Re: macOS Digital Signature Setup for AOO

The issue is that for AOO 4.1.x we must use an out-of-date version of Xcode. With 4.2.0 and beyond, we use later versions of Xcode (and the SDK) that fully support the Apple requirements. > On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I think our setup for macOS digital signat

Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

If HEAD of the branch is ready, then I'm all for an RC1. Once I hear definitively, I'll start the Linux and macOS builds > On Sep 17, 2021, at 5:27 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Yes > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 17, 2021, at 2:09 AM, Pedro Lino >> wrote: >> >> Hi Matthias >> On 0

Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

The macOS, Linux64 and Linux32 builds are also there! > On Sep 23, 2021, at 9:48 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have uploaded all Windows binaries to: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/ > > Although we have not yet announced AOO 4.1.11-

Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

exxAndJava.(RexxAndJava.java:880) > at > org.rexxla.bsf.engines.rexx.RexxEngine.initialize(RexxEngine.java:291) > at org.apache.bsf.BSFManager$8.run(BSFManager.java:854) > at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at org.apache.

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ]

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

> On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Arrigo Marchiori >> wrote: >> >> Hello Dave, All, >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three wa

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

cus > > > > Am 30.09.21 um 12:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community >> builds of >> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA. >> [...] >> This vote will be open for the normal 72hrs. > > > ---

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

> On Sep 30, 2021, at 6:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

[CLOSED] Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

The vote on releasing AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA is CLOSED. The vote has PASSED. > On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 04.10.21 um 13:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Agreed! > > Marcus already casted his vote. > > Maybe it i

Re: Compatibility of new releases with older operating systems

For Linux it's hard, because it depends on so many factors, such as kernel version, libc versions, etc... Also, you can build a stripped down version on older platforms that lack new libraries, or build against a new OS and include all the bells and whistles. The best we've been able to come up wi

Re: macOS Monterey

Agreed > On Oct 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Pedro Lino > wrote: > > Hi Matthias > > People who bought the M1 are those who want to have "the latest" so if they > are about to upgrade, AOO should be ahead. > My opinion is yes. > In any case people with an M1 Apple are probably 0,0001% of AOO users,

Openssl, serf and curl

I've recently folded in openssl-1.1 to trunk and all branches, but this gets us in a corner. To support this version of openssl, we need to upgrade Serf. This means that we need to also update apr and apr-util as well as include a requirement that the build server also as SCons installed. This

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> Hi Jim, > > Am 09.11.21 um 21:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I've recently folded in openssl-1.1 to trunk and all branches, but this gets >> us in a corner. >> >> To support this version of openssl, we need to upgrade Serf. This means that >&g

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

Ugg ugg and double ugg We seem to be stuck in a chicken-and-egg situation. Do we *really* need OpenSSL 1.1? Because even the latest release of serf doesn't really support that. What is the issue w/ using OpenSSL 1.0.2 that is driving us to OpenSSL 1.1? PS: OpenSSL is universally, IMO, becoming

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf is upgraded to support 1.1 > On Nov 10, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.11.21 um 18:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Ugg ugg and double ugg >> >> We seem to be stuck

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

We could, but they are worse at releases than we are :-P > On Nov 10, 2021, at 1:24 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.11.21 um 19:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf is >> upgraded to support 1.1 >

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 10, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.11.21 um 19:30 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> We could, but they are worse at releases than we are :-P > > A problem that needs to be fixed... ;-) > > BTW: I think you reverted one of my commits?

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

On Nov 11, 2021, at 7:35 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Jim, All, > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:19:16PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf >> is upgraded to support 1.1 > > Sorry... do yo

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

n Nov 11, 2021, at 8:46 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 11.11.21 um 14:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> According to the serf mailing list, there are issues, at least with the test >> suite. >> >> Can someone confirm that AOO42X/trunk do N

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 11, 2021, at 10:51 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > > > I still think we should work on 2. somehow. For AOO42X and above, I agree. It's a lot of work for AOO41X simply because of the additional requirements for the old build systems.

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)curl option... Since we don't use any of the fancy features of serf, I'm thinking that the easy option might be best - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:36 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Arrigo, > > On 11/17/21 2:16 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I pushed a new branch "serf", that contains the OpenSSL upgrade >> commits (I reverted the reverts ;-) plus a tentative upgrade of the >> serf library to 1.3.9.

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

I wonder if maybe we should also consider dropping OpenSSL for LibreSSL - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: unfortunately I have to say goodbye to the AOO project

++1! > On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:13:50 +0100, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> unfortunately I have to say goodbye to the AOO project, the reasons are >> family related. >> >> I would like to thank everyone involved in AOO an

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

That's right... I'll wait to even try compiling until things settle down and we have some slowly moving target I can compile and build against. > On Feb 8, 2022, at 6:06 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Arrigo, > > No need to apologize. ;-) > > But I think, before we begin to think about

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

> On Feb 10, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 10.02.22 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Matthias, all >> >>> On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it. >> Is there any reason

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

If everyone is in agreement, I'll create a macOS and Linux test/dev build of AOO41X HEAD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

The en-US version of a dev/test of AOO 4.1.12 can be found here: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.o

Re: AOO 4.1.12?

Thanks! I volunteer to RM. Is that OK? > On Mar 15, 2022, at 6:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just FYI, I created a Release Schedule for AOO 4.1.12: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.12 > > Feel free to update! > > Regards, > >Matthias >

AOO 4.1.12 patches

Other than https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=244111&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.12 What other patches are we looking at? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-

Re: AOO 4.1.12 patches

OK, i'll do a quick test build of HEAD on CentOS5 64-and-32 and we'll see if we are ready to rock and roll. > On Mar 22, 2022, at 8:09 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 22.03.22 um 11:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Other than >> >&g

4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

... Are available at http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Assuming these look good, we can progress to an RC1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openof

Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

Are we ready for a RC1? > On Mar 27, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 25.03.22 um 13:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> ... Are available at >> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > Thanks! > > I tested

Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

I'll start work on an RC1 this week. RC1 will be based on 60e0a1c111c55ed3416146f0d2a848c993474018 > On Apr 7, 2022, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 05.04.22 um 14:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are we ready for a RC1? > > So, basical

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ] yes

Re: Building 4.1.12-RC1 Linux x86

The source of truth on how we build the community packages are the build script and the config.log file, which shows exactly what packages, features, and libraries are included. Have you ensured that all the packages from https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_ste

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

+1 > On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I'll keep this open for a few more days to allow for more testing and voting... > On Apr 21, 2022, at 1:36 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community >> builds of >> Ap

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary number of binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES. > On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apac

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

gt; Hi Jim, >> >> Am 26.04.22 um 15:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary >>> number of >>> binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES. >> Yes, I also hoped for more... >> >

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.13-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ] yes

Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

This has been the case for years. Recall that the binary builds are community convenience packages. > On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi All, > > Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and > not Jim's (the Release Manager). > The policy s

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

> On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

[CLOSED] Vote Passed: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA)

The polls are closed; the VOTE PASSES. Thx to all who voted and tested. > On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. > > These arti

Re: [CLOSED] Vote Passed: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA)

idel: >> Hi all, >> >> The Windows binaries were signed and re-uploaded. >> >> I created the staged dir on SourceForge and rsynced all binaries. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 16.07.22 um 15:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: &g

Re: source release with MacOSx build.log

+1 (patches welcome) > On Aug 28, 2022, at 5:31 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > Am 28.08.22 um 23:20 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> On 27/08/22 Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 23.08.22 um 23:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs: I found a note that we package the build log (which is 20 Mega

Re: Monteray MacOS build and Python

Just because Apple doesn't ship it, doesn't mean it's not available. You can still download it via MacPorts or Homebrew. > On Sep 5, 2022, at 9:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:36 AM Bidouille > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Since MacOS 12.3, A

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be added before we build? > On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago. >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, all, > > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux buil

Support for maven

There are some java apps that no longer support ant and instead rely on maven. Last I checked, I don't think we support that, do we? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Support for maven

The later versions of beanshell, starting w/ 3.x will be maven only, I think > On Dec 2, 2022, at 5:05 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On 12/2/22 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> There are some java apps that no longer support ant and >> instead rely on mav

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week > On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Let me know when we are ready

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

failed to download https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 519. Hmmm > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Perfect. I'll start some d

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Had to reboot the VM... > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > failed to download > https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download > at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line > 519.

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ macOS builds are on-going

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: >> >>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ >> <https://home.a

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

My macOS Catalina build server VM is very unreliable... working on getting it back in shape. > On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > > Thanks, my Windows buil

Re: build breaks with: osl/unx/mutex.c:69: undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np'

Is this trunk, AOO42X or AOO41X ? > On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:01 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello All, > > I try to build OpenOffice on Ubuntu 22.04.1 > > It seems that the macro flag "Linux" has not set. Anyone had this issue? > > > All the best > > Peter > > > -

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve these issues. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

nges are needed? > > Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get >> AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

ards, > >Matthias > > Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes >> are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path. >> >>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Se

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

ag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X >> then. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Yep! Just finished building and uploading! >>> >>>> On Dec 23, 20

Re: Nightly Builds

+1 > On Jan 26, 2023, at 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we can all agree on a 4 week (30 days) period for archiving the > binaries? > > Looking at: > > https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linux64/?C=M;O=D > > we should also think about shortening the

Re: AOO 4.1.14

++1! > On Feb 7, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > I hope you get better soon! > > On 2/7/23 9:09 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Carl, >> >> Am 07.02.23 um 14:52 schrieb Carl Marcum: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> On 2/7/23 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I think it is t

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.14-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.14-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

+1 > On Feb 13, 2023, at 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.14-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: [DISCUSS] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

FWIW, I'm fine keeping the vote open a few days longer. > On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > Am 20.02.23 um 00:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 19.02.23 um 23:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Peter, >>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >