Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

has that patch I sent, because I am not sure it > works yet. > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 8:07 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I mean, is there a branch with this already folded in? >> >>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>&

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

I mean, is there a branch with this already folded in? > On Feb 22, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Either trunk or AOO42X. > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Which branch? >> >>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM,

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Which branch? > On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format > on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test > macOS. A quick look at the code shows we might need another

AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 Community Builds Available for Testing and Fun

We have community builds of AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 available for download and testing at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/ We encourage people to try these builds out and to provide feedback and PRs against them; These are NOT production ready! Heck, they aren't even

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> macOS and Linux64 have also been upload

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded. > Great! I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today. >> >> Since these are develope

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/ >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any c

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

Current on AOO42X is c51e9806. Should we start there? > On Jan 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case? > I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build. >> >&

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case? > On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed > > Co

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

s a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed? > > I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system. > > We need to check for macOS/Linux now. > >> >> In any case, +1 to updating libraries > > That is the intention. >

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS > On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi All, >> and a happy new year! >> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work >> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for

Re: AOO 4.1.15 Release Schedule

Perfect, thanks! I'll start the xfer to SF tomorrow am > On Dec 18, 2023, at 1:40 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have now signed and re-uploaded all Windows binaries. > > The Release Schedule was updated as far as I was involved: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

I call this vote CLOSED. Based on the responses, AOO 4.1.15-RC2 has been approved as GA. Thanks to all who tested and voted. > On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenO

Re: Open letter to TDF

Maybe new leadership at TDF will encourage cooperation between LO and AOO instead of still harboring ill-will between the 2 efforts. > On Dec 11, 2023, at 2:28 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > > For some months now, the libreoffice community has been in turmoil. > A new committee is set to oust the

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

> On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC2 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/d

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC2 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.15-RC2/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [

RECALLED (Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA)

I am recalling and closing this VOTE as we work on getting a RC2 release out. Thanks to all who tested and voted!! > On Nov 1, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

Good idea! > On Nov 19, 2023, at 4:16 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Jim, All, > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:59:46AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Are there any patches or additions anyone thinks would be >> appropriate to add in for a RC2 or is RC1 &q

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

Are there any patches or additions anyone thinks would be appropriate to add in for a RC2 or is RC1 "good enough"? > On Nov 13, 2023, at 2:32 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 11.11.23 um 22:59 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:51:42AM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> [...] >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

> On Nov 1, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/d

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.15-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:

Re: "Roadmap"

Yep. macOS and Linux 32 and 64 bit builds (as source) are uploaded to dist/dev > On Oct 24, 2023, at 5:52 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 23.10.23 um 14:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'll start some dev builds for 0a12a2c1 > > So thi

Re: "Roadmap"

I'll start some dev builds for 0a12a2c1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: "Roadmap"

I'm back from the All Things Open event, so I signed up for some tasks as well. > On Oct 18, 2023, at 5:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 17.10.23 um 16:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 05.10.23 um 16:50 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> Matthias Seidel wrote: I would like to collect ideas

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 5, 2023, at 3:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Oct 4, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > <mailto:dam...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski > <mailto:j...@jagunet.com> <mailto:j...@

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 4, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > >> >> >>> On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>> 127154 and 12796

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 2, 2023, at 12:11 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Is there a step by step how to build AOO on these? Knowing the steps would > allow someone who is interested to try on their own Mac. > > Remind what version of macOS should be the minimum? My 11 year old iMac can > only be on

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > 127154 and 127966 need to be looked at by a Mac developer. > Those look pretty old. I should create a quick macOS 4.2.0 dev build for testing - To unsubscribe,

Re: [RESULT] PASSED Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

Fantastic! Thank you. > On Feb 23, 2023, at 4:23 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi All, > > Am 23.02.23 um 15:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> With 8 binding +1 votes, this PASSES. >> >> Thanks to all who tested and voted. >> >> We will c

[RESULT] PASSED Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

With 8 binding +1 votes, this PASSES. Thanks to all who tested and voted. We will continue with the release process. > On Feb 13, 2023, at 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOf

Re: [DISCUSS] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

FWIW, I'm fine keeping the vote open a few days longer. > On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > Am 20.02.23 um 00:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 19.02.23 um 23:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Peter,

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

+1 > On Feb 13, 2023, at 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.14-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.14-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.14-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [

Re: AOO 4.1.14

++1! > On Feb 7, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > I hope you get better soon! > > On 2/7/23 9:09 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Carl, >> >> Am 07.02.23 um 14:52 schrieb Carl Marcum: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> On 2/7/23 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I think it is

Re: Nightly Builds

+1 > On Jan 26, 2023, at 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we can all agree on a 4 week (30 days) period for archiving the > binaries? > > Looking at: > > https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linux64/?C=M;O=D > > we should also think about shortening

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

ag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X >> then. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Yep! Just finished building and uploading! >>> >>>> On Dec 23, 20

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

ards, > >Matthias > > Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes >> are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path. >> >>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

nges are needed? > > Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get >> AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 unt

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve these issues. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: build breaks with: osl/unx/mutex.c:69: undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np'

Is this trunk, AOO42X or AOO41X ? > On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:01 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello All, > > I try to build OpenOffice on Ubuntu 22.04.1 > > It seems that the macro flag "Linux" has not set. Anyone had this issue? > > > All the best > > Peter > > >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

My macOS Catalina build server VM is very unreliable... working on getting it back in shape. > On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > > Thanks, my Windows buil

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

0-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: >> >>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ >> <https://home.apache

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ macOS builds are on-going

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Had to reboot the VM... > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > failed to download > https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download > at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line &

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

failed to download https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 519. Hmmm > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Perfect. I'll start some d

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week > On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Let me know when we are ready for a

Re: Support for maven

The later versions of beanshell, starting w/ 3.x will be maven only, I think > On Dec 2, 2022, at 5:05 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On 12/2/22 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> There are some java apps that no longer support ant and >> instead rely on mav

Support for maven

There are some java apps that no longer support ant and instead rely on maven. Last I checked, I don't think we support that, do we? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, all, > > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. &

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be added before we build? > On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago.

Re: Monteray MacOS build and Python

Just because Apple doesn't ship it, doesn't mean it's not available. You can still download it via MacPorts or Homebrew. > On Sep 5, 2022, at 9:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:36 AM Bidouille > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Since MacOS 12.3,

Re: source release with MacOSx build.log

+1 (patches welcome) > On Aug 28, 2022, at 5:31 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > Am 28.08.22 um 23:20 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> On 27/08/22 Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 23.08.22 um 23:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs: I found a note that we package the build log (which is 20

Re: [CLOSED] Vote Passed: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA)

idel: >> Hi all, >> >> The Windows binaries were signed and re-uploaded. >> >> I created the staged dir on SourceForge and rsynced all binaries. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 16.07.22 um 15:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: &g

[CLOSED] Vote Passed: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA)

The polls are closed; the VOTE PASSES. Thx to all who voted and tested. > On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. > > These a

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

> On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

This has been the case for years. Recall that the binary builds are community convenience packages. > On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi All, > > Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and > not Jim's (the Release Manager). > The policy

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.13-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ] yes

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

i Jim, >> >> Am 26.04.22 um 15:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary >>> number of >>> binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES. >> Yes, I also hoped for more... >> >> Howe

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary number of binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES. > On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache Op

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I'll keep this open for a few more days to allow for more testing and voting... > On Apr 21, 2022, at 1:36 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community >> builds of >> Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

+1 > On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: Building 4.1.12-RC1 Linux x86

The source of truth on how we build the community packages are the build script and the config.log file, which shows exactly what packages, features, and libraries are included. Have you ensured that all the packages from

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ] yes

Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

I'll start work on an RC1 this week. RC1 will be based on 60e0a1c111c55ed3416146f0d2a848c993474018 > On Apr 7, 2022, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 05.04.22 um 14:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are we ready for a RC1? > > So, basically on

Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

Are we ready for a RC1? > On Mar 27, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 25.03.22 um 13:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> ... Are available at >> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > Thanks! > > I tested

4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

... Are available at http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Assuming these look good, we can progress to an RC1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: AOO 4.1.12 patches

OK, i'll do a quick test build of HEAD on CentOS5 64-and-32 and we'll see if we are ready to rock and roll. > On Mar 22, 2022, at 8:09 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 22.03.22 um 11:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Other than >> >> >

AOO 4.1.12 patches

Other than https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=244111_format=advanced=FIXED=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE_milestone=4.1.12 What other patches are we looking at? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1.12?

Thanks! I volunteer to RM. Is that OK? > On Mar 15, 2022, at 6:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just FYI, I created a Release Schedule for AOO 4.1.12: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.12 > > Feel free to update! > > Regards, > >Matthias >

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

The en-US version of a dev/test of AOO 4.1.12 can be found here: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

If everyone is in agreement, I'll create a macOS and Linux test/dev build of AOO41X HEAD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

> On Feb 10, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 10.02.22 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Matthias, all >> >>> On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it. >> Is there any reason

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

That's right... I'll wait to even try compiling until things settle down and we have some slowly moving target I can compile and build against. > On Feb 8, 2022, at 6:06 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Arrigo, > > No need to apologize. ;-) > > But I think, before we begin to think

Re: unfortunately I have to say goodbye to the AOO project

++1! > On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:13:50 +0100, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> unfortunately I have to say goodbye to the AOO project, the reasons are >> family related. >> >> I would like to thank everyone involved in AOO

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

I wonder if maybe we should also consider dropping OpenSSL for LibreSSL - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:36 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Arrigo, > > On 11/17/21 2:16 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I pushed a new branch "serf", that contains the OpenSSL upgrade >> commits (I reverted the reverts ;-) plus a tentative upgrade of the >> serf library to

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)curl option... Since we don't use any of the fancy features of serf, I'm thinking that the easy option might be best - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 11, 2021, at 10:51 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > > > I still think we should work on 2. somehow. For AOO42X and above, I agree. It's a lot of work for AOO41X simply because of the additional requirements for the old build systems.

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

Nov 11, 2021, at 8:46 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 11.11.21 um 14:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> According to the serf mailing list, there are issues, at least with the test >> suite. >> >> Can someone confirm that AOO42X/trunk do NOT ha

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 11, 2021, at 7:35 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Jim, All, > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:19:16PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf >> is upgraded to support 1.1 > > Sorry... do yo

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

> On Nov 10, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.11.21 um 19:30 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> We could, but they are worse at releases than we are :-P > > A problem that needs to be fixed... ;-) > > BTW: I think you reverted one of my commi

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

We could, but they are worse at releases than we are :-P > On Nov 10, 2021, at 1:24 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.11.21 um 19:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf is >> upgraded to support 1.1 >

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

To be honest, I think we are *stuck* with OpenSSL 1.0.2 until Serf is upgraded to support 1.1 > On Nov 10, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.11.21 um 18:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Ugg ugg and double ugg >> >> We seem to be stuck

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

Ugg ugg and double ugg We seem to be stuck in a chicken-and-egg situation. Do we *really* need OpenSSL 1.1? Because even the latest release of serf doesn't really support that. What is the issue w/ using OpenSSL 1.0.2 that is driving us to OpenSSL 1.1? PS: OpenSSL is universally, IMO,

Re: Openssl, serf and curl

Jim, > > Am 09.11.21 um 21:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I've recently folded in openssl-1.1 to trunk and all branches, but this gets >> us in a corner. >> >> To support this version of openssl, we need to upgrade Serf. This means that >> we need to

Openssl, serf and curl

I've recently folded in openssl-1.1 to trunk and all branches, but this gets us in a corner. To support this version of openssl, we need to upgrade Serf. This means that we need to also update apr and apr-util as well as include a requirement that the build server also as SCons installed. This

Re: macOS Monterey

Agreed > On Oct 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Pedro Lino > wrote: > > Hi Matthias > > People who bought the M1 are those who want to have "the latest" so if they > are about to upgrade, AOO should be ahead. > My opinion is yes. > In any case people with an M1 Apple are probably 0,0001% of AOO

Re: Compatibility of new releases with older operating systems

For Linux it's hard, because it depends on so many factors, such as kernel version, libc versions, etc... Also, you can build a stripped down version on older platforms that lack new libraries, or build against a new OS and include all the bells and whistles. The best we've been able to come up

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

> On Sep 30, 2021, at 6:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

gt; > > > Am 30.09.21 um 12:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community >> builds of >> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA. >> [...] >> This vote will be open for the normal 72hrs. > > >

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

> On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Arrigo Marchiori >> wrote: >> >> Hello Dave, All, >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.11-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ]

Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

exxAndJava.(RexxAndJava.java:880) > at > org.rexxla.bsf.engines.rexx.RexxEngine.initialize(RexxEngine.java:291) > at org.apache.bsf.BSFManager$8.run(BSFManager.java:854) > at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at org.apache.

Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

The macOS, Linux64 and Linux32 builds are also there! > On Sep 23, 2021, at 9:48 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have uploaded all Windows binaries to: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/binaries/ > > Although we have not yet announced AOO

Re: AOO41X: Time for RC1?

If HEAD of the branch is ready, then I'm all for an RC1. Once I hear definitively, I'll start the Linux and macOS builds > On Sep 17, 2021, at 5:27 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Yes > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 17, 2021, at 2:09 AM, Pedro Lino >> wrote: >> >> Hi Matthias >> On

Re: macOS Digital Signature Setup for AOO

The issue is that for AOO 4.1.x we must use an out-of-date version of Xcode. With 4.2.0 and beyond, we use later versions of Xcode (and the SDK) that fully support the Apple requirements. > On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I think our setup for macOS digital

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

I believe the fix, which is universal, is already folded into the repos > On Aug 25, 2021, at 5:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Am 06.08.21 um 12:26 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello Jim, All, >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 05, 202

Re: Test builds AOO 4.1.11

And the macOS, Linux64 and Linux32 bit builds can be found at: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.1.11-test/ Cheers! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Test builds AOO 4.1.11

HEAD on origin/AOO41X? > On Aug 19, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 19.08.21 um 15:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Should I do macOS and Linux ones as well? > > I think that would be great! > > Regards, > >Matth

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >