Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-20 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 19/02/15 20:57, Rob Weir wrote:
 The page in question is here:
 
 http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
 
 Voting choices are:

 [ ] Leave the page as it is.

 [X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
 tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.

 [ ] Delete the entire page.

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-20 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton


-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 11:58
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

The page in question is here:

http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html

Voting choices are:

[ ] Leave the page as it is.

[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.

[X] Delete the entire page.


The vote will last for 72-hours.  All are welcome to vote.  PMC votes
are binding.  Please put comments into the parallel [VOTE][DISCUSS]
thread.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
 The page in question is here:

 http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html

 Voting choices are:

 [ ] Leave the page as it is.

 [X ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
 tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.

 [ ] Delete the entire page.


 The vote will last for 72-hours.  All are welcome to vote.  PMC votes
 are binding.  Please put comments into the parallel [VOTE][DISCUSS]
 thread.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread Marcus
[X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the 
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.


Marcus



Am 02/19/2015 08:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:

The page in question is here:

http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html

Voting choices are:

[ ] Leave the page as it is.

[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.

[ ] Delete the entire page.


The vote will last for 72-hours.  All are welcome to vote.  PMC votes
are binding.  Please put comments into the parallel [VOTE][DISCUSS]
thread.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Rob Weir wrote:
 The page in question is here:
 
 http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
 
 Voting choices are:
 
 [ ] Leave the page as it is.
 
 [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
 tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
 
 [ ] Delete the entire page.
 
 
 The vote will last for 72-hours.  All are welcome to vote.  PMC votes
 are binding.  Please put comments into the parallel [VOTE][DISCUSS]
 thread.
 
[ ] Leave the page as it is.

[X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.

[ ] Delete the entire page.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread jan i
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:

 I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams.   I think a good interim
 maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page
 ad lib.  I haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet.  If
 that stays, it needs to ripple through the translations too.

I too favor the option proposed by Tim


 If I have to cast a ballot on the [VOTE] as worded, it will be for
 deletion.

I strongly believe voting is doing more damage than good.

but given the choices, I would have to VOTE
+1 for deleting the page.

but please sleep on it, cancel the vote tomorrow, and make a wording
together with Andrea that the PMC (this includes Jim and yourself) are
happy with.

rgds
jan i


  - Dennis

 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Williams [mailto:william...@gmail.com javascript:;]
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 09:53
 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
 Subject: Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause
 unfruitful discussions.

 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i j...@apache.org javascript:;
 wrote:
  [ ... ]
  I simply do not see the need that AOO goes out alone, on confrontation
  course with ASF, to explain the difference in licenses seen specifically
  for our pow. We do not need this kind of pointing fingers. Let other
  projects use the license they believe in and let us use the license ASF
  believe in without telling we are better or even different than the
 others.

 fwiw, as a lurker here, that approach is much more consistent with the
 broader culture around here. Leave the provocative stuff to personal
 blogs and media.  I think a good solution is to just delete the page
 and add a link to the faq[1] to your existing 'free' page[2] - I just
 don't see any value beyond what's already written between those two.

 Thanks,

 --tim

 [1] - http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#WhatDoesItMEAN

 [2] - http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_free.html

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;



-- 
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.


Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Fisher

On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:28 PM, jan i wrote:

 On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
 wrote:
 
 I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams.   I think a good interim
 maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page
 ad lib.  I haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet.  If
 that stays, it needs to ripple through the translations too.
 
 I too favor the option proposed by Tim
 
 
 If I have to cast a ballot on the [VOTE] as worded, it will be for
 deletion.
 
 I strongly believe voting is doing more damage than good.
 
 but given the choices, I would have to VOTE
 +1 for deleting the page.
 
 but please sleep on it, cancel the vote tomorrow, and make a wording
 together with Andrea that the PMC (this includes Jim and yourself) are
 happy with.

+101

Regards,
Dave

 
 rgds
 jan i
 
 
 - Dennis
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Williams [mailto:william...@gmail.com javascript:;]
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 09:53
 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
 Subject: Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause
 unfruitful discussions.
 
 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i j...@apache.org javascript:;
 wrote:
 [ ... ]
 I simply do not see the need that AOO goes out alone, on confrontation
 course with ASF, to explain the difference in licenses seen specifically
 for our pow. We do not need this kind of pointing fingers. Let other
 projects use the license they believe in and let us use the license ASF
 believe in without telling we are better or even different than the
 others.
 
 fwiw, as a lurker here, that approach is much more consistent with the
 broader culture around here. Leave the provocative stuff to personal
 blogs and media.  I think a good solution is to just delete the page
 and add a link to the faq[1] to your existing 'free' page[2] - I just
 don't see any value beyond what's already written between those two.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --tim
 
 [1] - http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#WhatDoesItMEAN
 
 [2] - http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_free.html
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread Kay Schenk


On 02/19/2015 11:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
 The page in question is here:
 
 http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
 
 Voting choices are:
 
 [ ] Leave the page as it is.
 
 [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
 tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
 
 [ ] Delete the entire page.
 
 
 The vote will last for 72-hours.  All are welcome to vote.  PMC votes
 are binding.  Please put comments into the parallel [VOTE][DISCUSS]
 thread.

[ X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
 tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.


-- 
-
MzK

An old horse for a long, hard road,
 a young pony for a quick ride.
 -- Texas Bix Bender

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Fisher
Forgive my slipping a discussion on the vote thread with my +101.

I have thought about things and I am going to cast the following vote:

[X] delete the page.

Why?

It does not help the overall OpenOffice community to be making a strong 
argument over this issue at this point in time.

it does not help to be parsing and discussing a range of possible language.

In addition for end users it is FOSS regardless. This is the openoffice.org 
site.

If we want nuance we can put it on the project site in a single language.

Regards,
Dave

On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:

 
 On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:28 PM, jan i wrote:
 
 On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
 wrote:
 
 I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams.   I think a good interim
 maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page
 ad lib.  I haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet.  If
 that stays, it needs to ripple through the translations too.
 
 I too favor the option proposed by Tim
 
 
 If I have to cast a ballot on the [VOTE] as worded, it will be for
 deletion.
 
 I strongly believe voting is doing more damage than good.
 
 but given the choices, I would have to VOTE
 +1 for deleting the page.
 
 but please sleep on it, cancel the vote tomorrow, and make a wording
 together with Andrea that the PMC (this includes Jim and yourself) are
 happy with.
 
 +101
 
 Regards,
 Dave
 
 
 rgds
 jan i
 
 
 - Dennis
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Williams [mailto:william...@gmail.com javascript:;]
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 09:53
 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
 Subject: Re: Proposal to change or remove a web page that seems to cause
 unfruitful discussions.
 
 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i j...@apache.org javascript:;
 wrote:
 [ ... ]
 I simply do not see the need that AOO goes out alone, on confrontation
 course with ASF, to explain the difference in licenses seen specifically
 for our pow. We do not need this kind of pointing fingers. Let other
 projects use the license they believe in and let us use the license ASF
 believe in without telling we are better or even different than the
 others.
 
 fwiw, as a lurker here, that approach is much more consistent with the
 broader culture around here. Leave the provocative stuff to personal
 blogs and media.  I think a good solution is to just delete the page
 and add a link to the faq[1] to your existing 'free' page[2] - I just
 don't see any value beyond what's already written between those two.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --tim
 
 [1] - http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#WhatDoesItMEAN
 
 [2] - http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_free.html
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 javascript:;
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org