Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Simon P. Lucy
If you seriously want to redevelop OO then you need to rearchitect and replace in an incremental fashion. Don't try and convert code or even translate, instead concentrate on the features and replace using a micro architecture. S On 14 Oct 2016 12:48, wrote: > I have

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alex Suk wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote > > But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take > > 1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10 > > million > > lines of code... > > I am no

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 10/15/2016 10:17 AM, Alex Suk wrote: Damjan Jovanovic wrote But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take 1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10 million lines of code... Do 10M lines in C++ convert to 10M lines in Java? Is it a 1:1

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Alex Suk
e suite? Can this conversion be performed in a modular way? Many thanks for answering. -- View this message in context: http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/openoffice-programming-tp4683649p4683681.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive a

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-14 Thread Peter Kovacs
Instead of Languages I rather would like to discuss overall architecture. The initial Architecture has not been changed much since it was introduced i think. But over time the requirements I see in the code have changed. Solving Requirements with code and without adjusting the architecture