If you seriously want to redevelop OO then you need to rearchitect and
replace in an incremental fashion.
Don't try and convert code or even translate, instead concentrate on the
features and replace using a micro architecture.
S
On 14 Oct 2016 12:48, wrote:
> I have
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alex Suk wrote:
> Damjan Jovanovic wrote
> > But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take
> > 1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10
> > million
> > lines of code...
>
> I am no
On 10/15/2016 10:17 AM, Alex Suk wrote:
Damjan Jovanovic wrote
But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take
1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10
million
lines of code...
Do 10M lines in C++ convert to 10M lines in Java? Is it a 1:1
e suite?
Can this conversion be performed in a modular way?
Many thanks for answering.
--
View this message in context:
http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/openoffice-programming-tp4683649p4683681.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive a
Instead of Languages I rather would like to discuss overall
architecture. The initial Architecture has not been changed much since
it was introduced i think.
But over time the requirements I see in the code have changed. Solving
Requirements with code and without adjusting the architecture