[DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

2015-10-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Damjan Jovanovic wrote: [-1] Disapprove That's bad! Let's see if we can manage to explain it and at least get a 0, since I don't see anything really blocking in your reports (I mean, we do not require that the release has no issues at all, and we agree that what we are releasing is better

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

2015-10-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Ok, I am changing my vote to: [0] Abstain See below for details. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> [-1] Disapprove >> > > That's bad! Let's see if we can manage to explain it and at least get a 0, > since I don't see

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

2015-10-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Ok, I am changing my vote to: [0] Abstain Thanks for your understanding. I suppose since the file is generated, unused, and was present in previous releases, it shouldn't stop this release. ... since the file is a generated file and not a source file, that may not

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

2015-10-25 Thread Marcus
I don't see the "...Env.Set.sh" file as code file and therefore the rules don't apply here. But to be super-sure just delete the generated file(s) from the source tar balls and rebuild only these new. And +1 for extending the release notes with the other issues that affect the binaries.