> On Feb 6, 2024, at 2:00 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> Hi Dave, all
>
>> On 02/04/2024 8:01 PM WET Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> While testing if Bug
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
>>> was fixed
Hi Dave, all
> On 02/04/2024 8:01 PM WET Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > While testing if Bug
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
> > was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File
We have community builds of AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 available for download and testing
at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/
We encourage people to try these builds out and to provide feedback and PRs
against them; These are NOT production ready! Heck, they aren't even
> On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> While testing if Bug
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
> was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File Type
> filter does not include any MS XML files.
> I believe this needs to be
Hi all
While testing if Bug
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File Type
filter does not include any MS XML files.
I believe this needs to be added...
My question is: should I add it in Bug report
We should not announce dev builds outside of this mailing list. They are in no
way official and the intention is help the dev community in development. And
this is great because that is what you both are doing.
Thank you,
Dave
> On Feb 2, 2024, at 12:27 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi All,
Am 30.01.24 um 17:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Jim,
Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
Great!
I'll start on Linux32 bit
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
>> Great!
>
> I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today.
>
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
> Great!
I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today.
>>
>> Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release
Hi Jim,
Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
Great!
Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release candidates, do
we still need to bump? I guess we should anyway since these are now out in the
wild.
I am not sure, but we
macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release candidates, do
we still need to bump? I guess we should anyway since these are now out in the
wild.
> On Jan 27, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> All Windows builds are
All Windows builds are uploaded.
@Jim: We need to bump up the version number number, don't we?
Am 26.01.24 um 19:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
My AOO4.2.0-Dev5 Windows builds of #c51e9806e6 were successful and I
will upload then (incl. hashes, etc.) soon to:
My AOO4.2.0-Dev5 Windows builds of #c51e9806e6 were successful and I
will upload then (incl. hashes, etc.) soon to:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Am 26.01.24 um 00:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Current on AOO42X is c51e9806. Should we start there?
I would say so... ;-)
On Jan 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Matthias Seidel
wrote:
Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?
I am ready as soon as we decide
Current on AOO42X is c51e9806. Should we start there?
> On Jan 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?
> I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM,
Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?
I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.
On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
wrote:
Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Lets
Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
>
> Committed it, didn't build on Linux
Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.
I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.
Matthias
+1
On Jan 9,
Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
+1
On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Hi Matthias, all
On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote:
Unless
Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
> On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Matthias, all
>>
>>> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>> Unless someone else volunteers, I
Hi Pedro,
Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Hi Matthias, all
On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote:
Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
Please do ;)
Something we want to integrate?
How about this PR:
Hi Matthias, all
> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
> Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
Please do ;)
> Something we want to integrate?
>
> How about this PR:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
Is this a Linux fix only? What does
Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
Something we want to integrate?
How about this PR:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
Regards,
Matthias
Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
On Jan 7,
I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> and a happy new year!
>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work
>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work
towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the
whole translation process may be postponed
Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work
towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the
whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
26 matches
Mail list logo
