On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi Kay
>
> Why did you delete hamcrest from configure.ac in r1757861?
>
> It's essential: (recent) Junit doesn't work without it, and at least
> subsequent tests can't run!
>
> I will be adding it back soon if there are no objections.
>
>
Hi Kay
Why did you delete hamcrest from configure.ac in r1757861?
It's essential: (recent) Junit doesn't work without it, and at least
subsequent tests can't run!
I will be adding it back soon if there are no objections.
Regards
Damjan
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
On 08/20/2016 03:18 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
> On 08/18/2016 02:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/17/2016 04:37 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 12 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
Gradle.
Is it ok t
On 08/18/2016 02:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/17/2016 04:37 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 12 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
>>> Gradle.
>>>
>>> Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under
>>
On 08/17/2016 04:37 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 12 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
>> Gradle.
>>
>> Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under
>> ext_sources?
>
> I think it would be misleading beca
On 12 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
> Gradle.
>
> Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under
> ext_sources?
I think it would be misleading because of the directory name. Dragging
in extra depende
Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
Gradle.
Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under
ext_sources?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who do
On 11 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see
On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
--without-junit
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
>> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
>> old. This is unlikely to change, as the
On 11 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
> old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
> 10.04 which doesn't have newer
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org
wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being
> too
> > old. This i
On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
> old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
> 10.04 which does
Hi
If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
--without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
10.04 which doesn't have newer versions of Junit available in apt.
This is p
14 matches
Mail list logo
