Re: Debug oo Calc

Hi Stephan, You wrote to the dev mailing list. Am 08.02.23 um 22:53 schrieb Stephan Telgenkamp - HOT Sports + Toys: Hello Team, Happy user of the OpenOffice Suite. Now my oo Calc is giving problems. It hangs on making the backup. Is there a manual to debug this ? I do not get what you are

Re: OO losing pictures

e images. >>>>> >>>>> My guess is that the AutoRecovery process, when it happens, does not >>>>> correctly preserve the existing OpenOffice environment, perhaps itself >>>>> being interrupted by input keystrokes from the User. >>&

Re: OO losing pictures

t; AutoRecovery process, I regularly did lose images. >>>> >>>> My guess is that the AutoRecovery process, when it happens, does not >>>> correctly preserve the existing OpenOffice environment, perhaps itself >>>> being interrupted by input keystrokes f

Re: OO losing pictures

t;> being interrupted by input keystrokes from the User. > >> > >> I do not offer this as a sure-fire solution, but merely record my > >> experience > > > > Thank you for sharing your experience! > > > > A memory corruption may be the main pro

Re: OO losing pictures

upted by input keystrokes from the User. >>> >>> I do not offer this as a sure-fire solution, but merely record my >>> experience >> >> Thank you for sharing your experience! >> >> A memory corruption may be the main problem, but pictures nowadays ar

Re: OO losing pictures

d my experience Thank you for sharing your experience! A memory corruption may be the main problem, but pictures nowadays are typically much bigger than they were, when OO was designed. That said, I would like to increase the memory settings at least for trunk/AOO42X. Default is now: Graphics cache:

Re: OO losing pictures

merely record my experience > > Thank you for sharing your experience! > > A memory corruption may be the main problem, but pictures nowadays are > typically much bigger than they were, when OO was designed. > > That said, I would like to increase the memory settings at least

Re: OO losing pictures

okes from the User. > > I do not offer this as a sure-fire solution, but merely record my experience Thank you for sharing your experience! A memory corruption may be the main problem, but pictures nowadays are typically much bigger than they were, when OO was designed. That said, I would

OO losing pictures

There have been many reports of OpenOffice files Writer and Impress (not sure about Calc), of all versions, suddenly losing pictures, and leaving only a blank frame. I use the Xubuntu LTS versions, running usually the latest Apache OpenOffice, more recently the 4.5.0 nightlies. I have not us

Re: .docx extension taken in charge with Oo writer

> Could you give me a link to who is in charge of rectification of bugs > contained in Oo 4.1.11 please ? I can’t find it myself. http://www.openoffice.org/qa/issue_handling/pre_submission.html - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: .docx extension taken in charge with Oo writer

Hello again, Could you give me a link to who is in charge of rectification of bugs contained in Oo 4.1.11 please ? I can’t find it myself. There are a few things in Writer that I use extensively and I want to report them for future action. Thank you Bon WE Amicalement Alain From: Alain

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.11

Am 10.10.21 um 16:22 schrieb Marcelo Santana: On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:13:13 +0200, Marcus wrote: Am 10.10.21 um 01:08 schrieb Marcelo Santana: [...] BTW: Is there anything we can or should improve with our DEB files? I'm wondering of the reason for a second repository. Well, as far as I'v

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.11

On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:13:13 +0200, Marcus wrote: > Am 10.10.21 um 01:08 schrieb Marcelo Santana: Hi, Marcus. [...] > thanks for your service. My pleasure. > Please correct a link on top of the "REAME.md" file. > "https://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html"; is no longer > existing. Plea

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.11

On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 09:13:33 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Marcelo, Hi, Matthias! > Thanks, your work is always appreciated! It's always a pleasure. :-) > Regards, > >    Matthias Kind regards, Marcelo -- Marcelo Santana (aka msantana) 4096R/5B76053D: 8E9B 1014 4019 3526 C1C6 B0A

.docx extension taken in charge with Oo writer

Thank you for all your good work. Could you put for future program the compatibility of Writer with .DOCX We have now most of the documents sent by individuals using MS in that format and our program is not competible at the moment. Thank you for considering that Alain in Paris

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.11

Am 10.10.21 um 01:08 schrieb Marcelo Santana: The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now it provides the version 4.1.11 of Apache Openoffice with all available languages. All information needed for new installation or upgrade are available in the README file[1]. [1

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.11

Hi Marcelo, Thanks, your work is always appreciated! Regards,    Matthias Am 10.10.21 um 01:08 schrieb Marcelo Santana: > Hi all, > > The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now > it provides the version 4.1.11 of Apache Openoffice with all available

Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.11

Hi all, The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now it provides the version 4.1.11 of Apache Openoffice with all available languages. All information needed for new installation or upgrade are available in the README file[1]. [1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.9

Hi Marcelo, Thank you! Regards,    Matthias Am 08.02.21 um 13:40 schrieb Marcelo Santana: > Hi all, > > The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now > it provides the version 4.1.9 of Apache Openoffice with all available > languages. > > All infor

Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.9

Hi all, The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now it provides the version 4.1.9 of Apache Openoffice with all available languages. All information needed for new installation or upgrade are available in the README file[1]. [1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo

Re: test for OO on big Sur for mac

21 22:54:42 > Objet: test for OO on big Sur for mac > > dear all > > if you think I can help testing with the issues in opening .docx etc, > I will be glad to. > > I am based in Italy, and I work mainly on text documents at the > University of Udine, teaching Hungaria

test for OO on big Sur for mac

dear all if you think I can help testing with the issues in opening .docx etc, I will be glad to. I am based in Italy, and I work mainly on text documents at the University of Udine, teaching Hungarian and text analysis. thanks for the great job, folks Paolo Driussi (L-LIN19 FIlologia ugrofi

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

If you read through the LO bug report, you'll see that there are many patches for this bug, affecting multiple modules. Why? The historical files that are valid but have the wrong checksum due to having been written by the broken [OO.org-derivative] implementations when they were created, will st

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

Hi Brane, This is a very nice Idea. Maybe even beyond the immediate idea on fixing the SHA implementation. Thanks a lot for this Idea. All the Best Peter On 26.07.19 12:36, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 25.07.2019 00:43, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> >> I would like to ask if I or any ot

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

OT: Welcome back Rafael! On 25.07.19 22:57, Raphael Bircher wrote: > If the code is released from the original author under Apache License > v2.0 then we can include it, else we have to write our own solution > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:54 PM Keith N. McKenna > wrote: >> On 7/25/2019 1:26 PM,

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

On 25.07.2019 00:43, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > > I would like to ask if I or any other from OpenOffice Development team > can port the patch from LibreOffice to OpenOffice to fix this Issue > under the APL2 License, so the Issue can be fixed in OpenOffice without > more work then necessa

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

OT: Hi, Raphael - wb Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

If the code is released from the original author under Apache License v2.0 then we can include it, else we have to write our own solution On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:54 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > > On 7/25/2019 1:26 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Call me naive. I wanted to have the question asked. N

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

On 7/25/2019 1:26 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Call me naive. I wanted to have the question asked. No one should say that we > did not try it this way. > > Am 25. Juli 2019 09:38:28 MESZ schrieb Bidouille : >> >> >> - Mail original - >>> I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to lic

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

Call me naive. I wanted to have the question asked. No one should say that we did not try it this way. Am 25. Juli 2019 09:38:28 MESZ schrieb Bidouille : > > >- Mail original - >> I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to license it also >> under the ALv2 we cannot commit it to o

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

- Mail original - > I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to license it also > under the ALv2 we cannot commit it to our code base. +1 The author is Michael Stahl, employed at CIB GmbH. This company is copyleft addicted and LibO side only. ---

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

t > more work then necessary. > > LO Issue: 114939 > > OO Issue: 127661 > > Thanks for your considerations. > > > All the Best > > Peter > Peter; I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to license it also under the ALv2 we cannot commit it to ou

SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

Hello all, I would like to ask if I or any other from OpenOffice Development team can port the patch from LibreOffice to OpenOffice to fix this Issue under the APL2 License, so the Issue can be fixed in OpenOffice without more work then necessary. LO Issue: 114939 OO Issue: 127661 Thanks for

Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

On 06-28-2019 5:36 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: If you don't have a platform specific *.sh, you won't get anything to build. The references won't be right. But I do have a file called "SolarisSparcGccEnv.Set.sh". Is that not the right one? Did you take a look at the Solaris specific instructions a

Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

Hi Michele, Am 28.06.19 um 18:21 schrieb Michele Denber: >> >> Forwarded Message >> Subject:     Re: Fwd: Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended >> interpolation of @ENABLE >> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:09:48 +0200 >> From: M

Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

On 06/28/19 12:21, Michele Denber wrote: Why is ./configure not picking up the correct cp even though I'm supplying it? Oops, never mind. That was just operator error. I keep the configure command in a text file and then just copy & paste it to a terminal window. When it got long enough to

Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:09:48 +0200 From: Matthias Seidel Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Where did you take

Re: Fwd: Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

Hi Michele, Am 27.06.19 um 18:56 schrieb Michele Denber: > Well in the interest of expediency, I just commented out the two lines > in download_external_dependencies.pl that was causing ./bootstrap to > fail.  This time it went much further and downloaded a bunch of files > but now it's stopping w

Re: Fwd: Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

Well in the interest of expediency, I just commented out the two lines in download_external_dependencies.pl that was causing ./bootstrap to fail. This time it went much further and downloaded a bunch of files but now it's stopping with: ... all external libraries present dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 exist

Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

Subject:Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:02:17 +0200 From: Peter To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, Michele Denber Hello Michele, Is there no cups on Solaris? Hi Peter. That's actually not a simple que

Re: OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

cups package installed. > >Any help would be appreciated. > >Building Open Office 4.1.3 with gnu and OpenCSW toolchain, gcc 7.3 on a >Sun M3000 Sparc VII, Solaris 10U13. I was able to build OO 3.4 on this >machine, but this one isn't cooperating. Or is there already a >pre-built 4.1.3 Solaris package somewhere? > > - Michele -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

OO configure fails: Possible unintended interpolation of @ENABLE

CSWcups package installed. Any help would be appreciated. Building Open Office 4.1.3 with gnu and OpenCSW toolchain, gcc 7.3 on a Sun M3000 Sparc VII, Solaris 10U13. I was able to build OO 3.4 on this machine, but this one isn't cooperating. Or is there already a pre-built 4.1.3 Solaris package somewhere? - Michele

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:06:40 +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Marcelo, Hi Matthias, sorry for my delay. [...] > > Yeah, for sure! Who's the guy? > > Actually it is a woman. ;-) Great! By chance, is her nickname "imacat"? > >> Do you know, by any chance, someone willing to put toge

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

Debian repo, but that needs someone to do it... Regards,    Matthias > > Well, as far as I know, mainly based on LibreOffice packaging approach, > that task is not so simple. We need to understand what is the > requirements to have que OO ready to the Debian auto building sys

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

gt; package of OpenOffice? Unfortunately no. Well, as far as I know, mainly based on LibreOffice packaging approach, that task is not so simple. We need to understand what is the requirements to have que OO ready to the Debian auto building system. Anyway, I'm without free time to invest o

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

Hi Marcelo, Am 28.03.19 um 14:45 schrieb Marcelo Santana: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:37:14 +0100, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > >> Hi Marcelo, > Hi Matthias, > > [...] > >> Thanks a lot! > You're welcome! > >> Just to let you know that one of our committer is skilled in Debian >> packaging. >> So, don

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:37:14 +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Marcelo, Hi Matthias, [...] > Thanks a lot! You're welcome! > Just to let you know that one of our committer is skilled in Debian > packaging. > So, don't hesitate to ask here if you need assistance. Thank you so much! Actuall

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

Hi Marcelo, Am 28.03.19 um 13:19 schrieb Marcelo Santana: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:25:31 +0100, Marcus wrote: > > [...] > >> thanks a lot for making this possible. > You're welcome! > >> I've only a little request: >> >> In the readme you are pointing to the "other.html" webpage. You have >> to k

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:25:31 +0100, Marcus wrote: [...] > thanks a lot for making this possible. You're welcome! > I've only a little request: > > In the readme you are pointing to the "other.html" webpage. You have > to know that this is a very old version of our download system. It's > pos

Re: Fwd: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now it provides the version 4.1.6 of Apache Openoffice with all available languages. All information needed for new installations or upgrades are available in the README file[1]. [1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb

Fwd: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6

Hi all, Forwarding from users@, I think this is good news! ;-) Regards,    Matthias Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.6 Datum: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:05:16 -0300 Von:Marcelo Santana

Re: OO & Mojave issue?

8 iMac, with Mojave Ver 1014 running >> that O O's Ver 4.1.5 video frames, or if scrolling through a project that >> movement has become very jerky. There seems to be a slight time lag >> between mouse input and screen activity. >> >> I wondered if Apache i

Re: OO & Mojave issue?

input and screen activity. > > I wondered if Apache is aware and is working on or updating OO to run > smoothly on Mojave, or do I have a problem? > > My regards > > Michael Turner > Cambridge > UK > > > ---

OO & Mojave issue?

e and is working on or updating OO to run smoothly on Mojave, or do I have a problem? My regards Michael Turner Cambridge UK - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

work in Writer in Linux (i.e., that tab is > > inactive). Works OK (as Area tab) in Windows > > 3) Selecting Master Page sidebar in Impress Linux DEB 64 crashes OO. Works > > OK in Windows. > > > > Matthias Seidel tells me that his version of OO on Linux use

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

ollowing differences from the > Windows version. > > 1) Page Background tab in Linux is called Area tab in Windows > 2) Page Background does not work in Writer in Linux (i.e., that tab is > inactive). Works OK (as Area tab) in Windows > 3) Selecting Master Page sidebar in Impre

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:18:42 +0200 Peter Kovacs wrote: > Rory do you refer to this Issue > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127805. Yes, this is the same issue as far as Impress Master Pages is concerned on OO Linux DEB 64 There is the other issue in my posting that OO Linux

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

3) Selecting Master Page sidebar in Impress Linux DEB 64 crashes OO. Works OK in Windows. Matthias Seidel tells me that his version of OO on Linux uses Area, not Page to apply the Page backgrounds. The Page background problem also showed up on AOO 4.1.6 (linux DEB 64 version); others hav

OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

s 2) Page Background does not work in Writer in Linux (i.e., that tab is inactive). Works OK (as Area tab) in Windows 3) Selecting Master Page sidebar in Impress Linux DEB 64 crashes OO. Works OK in Windows. Matthias Seidel tells me that his version of OO on Linux uses Area, not Page to apply

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

76 > 2018-09-25_10:23:26  -  Rev. 1841915 > > Regards, >    Matthias Screenshot sent privately Currently using AOO420m1(Build:9800) - Rev. 1840700 2018-09-12_16:19:52 - Rev. 1840718 Rory > > >> I ran into this problem while trying to solve a user problem on For

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

d an "Area" tab and it is working as expected. I tested on xubuntu 18.04.1 (64-bit) with: AOO420m1(Build:9800)  -  Rev. 1841876 2018-09-25_10:23:26  -  Rev. 1841915 Regards,    Matthias >> I ran into this problem while trying to solve a user problem on Forum; it >> does n

Re: OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

respond. This is so whether I use /Format /Styles and Formatting /Pages, or /Format /Page. > > I ran into this problem while trying to solve a user problem on Forum; it > does not in any way affect my own personal work. > > I have not OO 4.1.6 installed, so cannot check that. >

OO 4.2.0 problem Page Background

; it does not in any way affect my own personal work. I have not OO 4.1.6 installed, so cannot check that. -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Long password problem in OO

Reported in: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122151 - Mail original - > De: "Rory O'Farrell" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Mars 2018 12:57:24 > Objet: Long password problem in OO > > On the en-Forum a user has reported that

Long password problem in OO

On the en-Forum a user has reported that OO will accept a long password, but actually uses only 15 characters of it. He suggests that the password input screen should warn if a password is longer than 15 chars. This seems reasonable and ought be an easy check to insert into any forthcoming OO

Re: Fwd: Question about OO requiurements

message -- From: JD Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:43 AM Subject: Question about OO requiurements To: Apache OpenOffice Could one of the developers tell me why I am getting this? Thanx. $ soffice GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/desktop/gnome/interface': Client failed to co

Fwd: Question about OO requiurements

-- Forwarded message -- From: JD Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:43 AM Subject: Question about OO requiurements To: Apache OpenOffice Could one of the developers tell me why I am getting this? Thanx. $ soffice GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/desktop/gnome/interface

Question about OO requiurements

Could one of the developers tell me why I am getting this? Thanx. $ soffice GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/desktop/gnome/interface': Client failed to connect to the D-BUS daemon: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the mes

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

4 (64 bit) installations, with OpenOffice 4.1.0 and 4.1.5 on each; no problem with rebuilding the Table of Contents on the test file. However, when I revert the test file to my normal computer (Xubuntu 16.04.03) the ToC takes hours to rebuild. I tried the old trick of a fresh OO User Profile

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 23:32:27 + toki wrote: > > > On 01/01/2018 10:27 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > I have tested this on Xubuntu 16.04.3 (XFCE), Ubuntu 16.04.3 (Gnome), > > Debian 9.30 (XFCE), all showing the same freeze. > > Where are you getting the Debian build from? > > jonathon >

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

On 01/01/2018 10:27 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > I have tested this on Xubuntu 16.04.3 (XFCE), Ubuntu 16.04.3 (Gnome), Debian > 9.30 (XFCE), all showing the same freeze. Where are you getting the Debian build from? jonathon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:11:27 +0100 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > Jose R R wrote: > >> Issue is present in my computing environment, too. > > "out of the box" Xubuntu 16.04.3 386 ... There was no problem on that > > system. > > I tested too and I wasn't able to reproduce the

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

Rory O'Farrell wrote: Andrea Pescetti wrote: The best archive build to use to the purpose would be the following: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/ (5th entry) I'll also try the OO 4.2.0 version you indicated. For the record, I've tried it on my syste

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

in it and test. > > Regards, >Andrea. > Will do tomorrow. From my tests I would not have expected the RPM system to have the problem; it is interesting that the problem does not show on the 4.1.0 running on Ubuntu 14.04. I have an Xubuntu 14.04 downloaded but have not time to tr

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

Rory O'Farrell wrote: Jose R R wrote: Issue is present in my computing environment, too. "out of the box" Xubuntu 16.04.3 386 ... There was no problem on that system. I tested too and I wasn't able to reproduce the problem: - 4.1.5 on an RPM-based system (operation took a few seconds) - 4.1.0

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 06:36:27 -0800 Jose R R wrote: > Andrea, > > Issue is present in my computing environment, too. I did a further test using an "out of the box" Xubuntu 16.04.3 386 install on an old 386 machine (4GB RAM) and OpenOffice 4.1.5 386 version. There was no problem on that system

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

Andrea, Issue is present in my computing environment, too. On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> >> I have tested this on Xubuntu 16.04.3 (XFCE), Ubuntu 16.04.3 (Gnome), >> Debian 9.30 (XFCE), all showing the same freeze. >> On Centos 7 and Antergos 17

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

me ago on earlier > versions of OO (certainly on OO 3.x, possibly on OO 2.x); this file has > ~2,500 A5 pages and uses Heading 1 and Heading 2 styles; when I open it on my > normal machines running Xubuntu 16.04.3 and make some change to the Table of > Contents, OO 4 versions freeze, taking

Re: A problem on OO Debian versions?

Rory O'Farrell wrote: I have tested this on Xubuntu 16.04.3 (XFCE), Ubuntu 16.04.3 (Gnome), Debian 9.30 (XFCE), all showing the same freeze. On Centos 7 and Antergos 17.12 (RPM distros) ToC rebuilds in about 10 seconds. I wouldn't blame it on the package format, since DEB and RPM versions hav

A problem on OO Debian versions?

Out of interest, I am testing the limits of Writer on largeish documents, edited as one unit (i.e., not as Master Documents). In Writer I have a large test file, 1.6 MB, prepared some time ago on earlier versions of OO (certainly on OO 3.x, possibly on OO 2.x); this file has ~2,500 A5 pages

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Great! Another regression was just reported - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127600 I wonder if it is fixed too? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 18, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > Database and Spreadsheets both work. Regressions are fixed. I haven't done > any further te

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Database and Spreadsheets both work. Regressions are fixed. I haven't done any further testing yet. Larry On 2017-11-18, 9:13 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: fingers-crossed... I have updated the files in devtools related to my successful build of AOO 4.1.4 for macOS that appears to fix both regressi

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

In the meantime, I need to figure out how to, in main/frameworks, have the gbuild system automatically change the -O2 to -O1 for MACOS... It's not CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS. There doesn't look to be a way to change gb_COMPILEROPTFLAGS and/or CFLAGSOPT via the gbuild eval->call functionality. > On Nov 18,

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Jim - Good news. I’m out of pocket until tomorrow evening. Perhaps Larry is available. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 18, 2017, at 7:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > That would be great! > > Unfortunately I can't help with testing on macOS... > > Regards, Ma

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Jim, That would be great! Unfortunately I can't help with testing on macOS... Regards, Matthias Am 18.11.2017 um 16:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > fingers-crossed... > > I have updated the files in devtools related to my successful build of AOO > 4.1.4 > for macOS that appears to fix both reg

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

fingers-crossed... I have updated the files in devtools related to my successful build of AOO 4.1.4 for macOS that appears to fix both regressions. Basically: o I had to use Xcode7 on Sierra o I had to compile frameworks w/ -O1 instead of -O2 Uploads to our dev dist repo are happening as we s

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Thank you :). What "success code"? Which multiple implementations? On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Peter kovacs wrote: > Awesome thanks Damjan! > > Would it make sense to route the success code through the connectivity > code for the future? > > I would rather like to have one time implementat

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Awesome thanks Damjan! Would it make sense to route the success code through the connectivity code for the future? I would rather like to have one time implementation instead of maintain redundant implementations. ( the drawback is that bugs have bigger impact. Ofc) Am 17. November 2017 15:26

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi I am familiar with the database driver code in main/connectivity, but much less familiar with the Base code main/dbaccess where the problem is. On an unrelated past bug in my code in a main/connectivity driver, I did however briefly encounter that same problem where clicking "Create table" doe

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

> On Nov 16, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Peter kovacs wrote: > > Hi Dave. > > Yea I see. Interesting information! Agreed! Esp: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622#c28 where it's stated that building w/ Sierra and Xcode8 "fixes" th

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi - I have a Mac on 10.7.5 and can update to El Capitan. I have a MacBook on Sierra. I am ready to do the needful next week. I think between the three of us we will find the solution next week! (Jim Rocks!) (Thanks Andrea!) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 16, 2017, at 8:56 PM, P

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Dave. Yea I see. Interesting information! I was thinking that maybe the archives have hidden more such marbles. Another idea could be if other developers have also problems in supporting a wide range of Apple versions? Maybe that gives some more hints /ideas. As I said I will make MacOS

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Peter, I wasted my time on Sierra and have asked your same question a few times. Andrea just sent a link to a BZ and mail thread regarding how Ariel got 4.1.3 to work. That information only partially made it to the Wiki instructions. Let’s wait for Jim to absorb this new information and then

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

What is your base for determine the build environment? I want to make time next week to try to build on my MacBook. Maybe I can come up with something. But no promises. Maybe until we have some new idea, we should start with 4.2.0. Is trunk affected too? Am 16. November 2017 19:40:17 MEZ schri

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Dave Fisher wrote: I’ve 4.1.3 works. I’ve confirmed that 4.1.2 GA has the Base problem. Read "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX": http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Status-of-quot-Base-4-1-2-does-not-open-Tables-and-Queries-in-Mac-OSX-quot-td4683000.html (this is sur

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Jim, Base works in 4.1.0, 4.1.1 and 4.1.3. Regards, Dave > On Nov 16, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > These builds are on AOO412. At this stage I'm just trying to get too-4.1.2 > on my mac builder to generate a build that matches our released version. > > Oh gr I just downl

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Jim, I’ve 4.1.3 works. I’ve confirmed that 4.1.2 GA has the Base problem. Regards, Dave > On Nov 16, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > These builds are on AOO412. At this stage I'm just trying to get too-4.1.2 > on my mac builder to generate a build that matches our released versio

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

These builds are on AOO412. At this stage I'm just trying to get too-4.1.2 on my mac builder to generate a build that matches our released version. Oh gr I just downloaded our 4.1.2 GA release and IT ALSO suffers from the table/database issue :( I've been wasting all this time assuming tha 4.1

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi Jim, Thanks. These kind of builds helps me appreciate our modern world of containers and cleaner dependencies. I wonder is your build taking the following patch? If so, is the patch still necessary? /openoffice/branches/AOO414/main/hsqldb/patches/i121754.patch Regards, Dave > On Nov 16, 2

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

I appreciate the 2nd set of eyes... I also, of course, went thru the diff. My point is that none of these seem to be in any way related to something that would cause such a major change in behavior. Alternatively, if it IS so fragile, then things are majorly borked. > On Nov 16, 2017, at 2:50 PM,

  1   2   3   4   >