Hello Andrea,
Am 26.05.2013 00:07, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
janI wrote:
in all fairness jsc and rob have worked with this for over a
year, so it would be more fair to have them do it, and I do not want to
come in between.
This is a good summary written by Juergen:
On 26 May 2013 09:53, Mechtilde o...@mechtilde.de wrote:
Hello Andrea,
Am 26.05.2013 00:07, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
janI wrote:
in all fairness jsc and rob have worked with this for over a
year, so it would be more fair to have them do it, and I do not want to
come in between.
Dave Fisher wrote:
The main concern that the ASF has with digitally signing with a
singular apache.org certificate for the whole foundation is keeping
it in strict control. For some this means physical machines. This is
a high bar.
I wonder if the ASF would allow AOO to experiment with an
On 25 May 2013 12:04, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
The main concern that the ASF has with digitally signing with a
singular apache.org certificate for the whole foundation is keeping
it in strict control. For some this means physical machines. This is
a high
Hello,
what about an organisation assurance by Cacert.
At FOSDEM 2013 there are some discussions with people from cacert.
If you need more informations and contacts I will act as an agent.
Let me know
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 25.05.2013 15:22, schrieb janI:
On 25 May 2013 12:04, Andrea
On 25 May 2013 15:31, Mechtilde o...@mechtilde.de wrote:
Hello,
what about an organisation assurance by Cacert.
At FOSDEM 2013 there are some discussions with people from cacert.
If you need more informations and contacts I will act as an agent.
If you can get some information, I would
Hello Jan,
can you give me a short description what we/you need and what are the
problems with apache infrastructure.
I'm not so familar with the apache infrastructure to understand all
things of the thread.
Then I will give this information to people who are familar with
organisation assurance
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts
On 25 May 2013 18:01, Mechtilde o...@mechtilde.de wrote:
Hello Jan,
can you give me a short description what we/you need and what are the
problems with apache infrastructure.
I could, but in all fairness jsc and rob have worked with this for over a
year, so it would be more fair to have
to do.
Juergen
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have
: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts signed by a Java code signing
cert
that is signed by a trusted/root CA so the jars can be downloaded
via
WebStart without the user
janI wrote:
in all fairness jsc and rob have worked with this for over a
year, so it would be more fair to have them do it, and I do not want to
come in between.
This is a good summary written by Juergen:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/ASFCodeSigning
Note that at FOSDEM we were
code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts signed by a Java code signing cert
that is signed by a trusted/root CA so the jars can be downloaded via
WebStart without the user receiving a warning
code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts signed by a Java code signing cert
that is signed by a trusted/root CA so the jars can be downloaded via
WebStart without the user receiving a warning
to discuss further at
the moment. I have enough other things to do.
Juergen
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging
: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts signed by a Java code signing cert
that is signed by a trusted/root CA so the jars can be downloaded via
WebStart without the user receiving
scott.de...@gmail.com
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts signed by a Java code signing cert
that is signed by a trusted/root CA so the jars
to do.
Juergen
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have
.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
To: infrastructure-...@apache.org
Logging Services has a simple requirement:
Have the Chainsaw build artifacts signed by a Java code
19 matches
Mail list logo
