Hi Damjan,
Am 24.08.19 um 19:27 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Hi
>
> I've done that in commit 61a4f434029376f30410cf27dbdd93c1f6011f21
Thanks!
Cherry-picked it for AOO42X and (hopefully right) for AOO417.
I am just building AOO42X. After finishing that I will build AOO417 and
upload it to my home
Hi
I've done that in commit 61a4f434029376f30410cf27dbdd93c1f6011f21
Regards
Damjan
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:32 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Maybe it would be possible to only overwrite those JDKs with vendor
> "private build" by "OpenJDK"?
>
> This would be a workaround for 4.
Hi Damjan,
Maybe it would be possible to only overwrite those JDKs with vendor
"private build" by "OpenJDK"?
This would be a workaround for 4.1.7 and we could further improve it for
the next release.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 20.08.19 um 03:58 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:30 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Am 18.08.19 um 20:26 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > That's great news. Thank you for testing.
> >
> > I am busy so it will take me a few days to finalize the patch and commit
> it.
>
> Looking forward to your commit. I will then
Thanks!
Am 18.08.19 um 20:26 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> That's great news. Thank you for testing.
>
> I am busy so it will take me a few days to finalize the patch and commit it.
Looking forward to your commit. I will then cherry-pick it for AOO42X
and AOO417.
Matthias
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 18,
That's great news. Thank you for testing.
I am busy so it will take me a few days to finalize the patch and commit it.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:49 PM Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello Damjan,
>
> I applied the patch and build it under Debian 9. The DEBs I got, worked
> under Debian 11.
>
> The detect
Hi all,
Am 18.08.19 um 18:49 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello Damjan,
>
> I applied the patch and build it under Debian 9. The DEBs I got, worked
> under Debian 11.
>
> The detection of Java 8u222, Java 11.0.4 and Java 12.0.2 works. Java
> means OpnJDK which is shipped with Debian.
>
> The German builds
Hello Damjan,
I applied the patch and build it under Debian 9. The DEBs I got, worked
under Debian 11.
The detection of Java 8u222, Java 11.0.4 and Java 12.0.2 works. Java
means OpnJDK which is shipped with Debian.
The German builds I published under
/home/mechtilde/public_html/NewBuild
Thanks
The attached patch starts to get it working. It should detect Java >= 8u222
but will wrongly label it "Oracle Corporation", as I haven't dug into the
main/jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/vendorbase.cxx file yet, which does
another vendor search.
Please test it on Java 11 if you can, as the java.
Hello Damjan,
I figured it out under Debian >= 9 with Java 8u222.
We need also a solution to detect java 11 which is used in Debian 10
(buster, stable)
Am 18.08.19 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Thank you for looking into it!
>
> Indeed it was Ubuntu 16.04 where I could rep
Hi Damjan,
Thank you for looking into it!
Indeed it was Ubuntu 16.04 where I could replicate the problem with
OpenJDK8u222.
Am 18.08.19 um 03:06 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Before:
> java.vendor=Oracle Corporation
>
> After:
> java.vendor=Private Build
>
> This is apparently something Java now a
Before:
java.vendor=Oracle Corporation
After:
java.vendor=Private Build
This is apparently something Java now allows configuring when it's built:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221171
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/e0b7721459ee
We probably need to relax the vendor checks,
Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing...
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> 8.202.8 and 8.212.4.1 work for me on FreeBSD.
>
> Let me see if I can find 8u222 somewhere.
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:23 PM Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
8.202.8 and 8.212.4.1 work for me on FreeBSD.
Let me see if I can find 8u222 somewhere.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:23 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If nobody can confirm this it must be an error on every installation
> that I run...
>
> Otherwise it would be a release blocker for 4.1.7
Hi all,
If nobody can confirm this it must be an error on every installation
that I run...
Otherwise it would be a release blocker for 4.1.7!
Regards,
Matthias
Am 14.08.19 um 16:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Am 14.08.19 um 07:02 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> Hi
>>
>> What doe
Hi Damjan,
Am 14.08.19 um 07:02 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Hi
>
> What does "java --version" give?
openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~16.04.1-b10)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode)
>
> You might need to backport the f
Hi
What does "java --version" give?
You might need to backport the following commit to 4.1.x:
commit 3bd2d6aed629c4323ea9e8426acfb793eb9046fd
Author: Damjan Jovanovic
Date: Sun Apr 15 15:00:46 2018 +
Allow the Java version suffix (eg. the 162 in 1.8.0_162) to be
3 digits long.
Hi all,
Today I noticed that on my Ubuntu machine OpenJDK 8u222 isn't listed in
AOO (4.1.6) anymore.
But everything works, it seems to be detected and to be used, that is
why I didn't notice it earlier.
I do remember that I got the update from Java 8u212 to Java 8u222 some
time ago.
In my test V
18 matches
Mail list logo
