On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
wrote:
> "Seriously out of date" is an understatement. We're almost talking
> archeology here. I haven't maintained that page in years, and the one that
> is most relevant is probably here, https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/, but it's
> not a planet.
>
2013/4/8 David Gerard
> http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/blogs.html
>
> This page is seriously out of date. In particular, there's four blog
> planets listed there, none of which are operational. Is there a new
> blog planet? Should there be?
>
Exactly one year ago there was a thread about a
"Seriously out of date" is an understatement. We're almost talking
archeology here. I haven't maintained that page in years, and the one that
is most relevant is probably here, https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/, but it's
not a planet.
louis
On 7 April 2013 18:42, David Gerard wrote:
> http://www.op
http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/blogs.html
This page is seriously out of date. In particular, there's four blog
planets listed there, none of which are operational. Is there a new
blog planet? Should there be?
- d.
-
To uns
