On 28.12.20 23:54, Marcus wrote:
Am 28.12.20 um 20:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 28.12.20 um 19:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
On 28.12.20 15:40, Marcus wrote:
We would then only learn of it if people run into issues. I rather
have them write a short mail to dev list, as I have suggested it in
the
al Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
edited. We cannot promise
-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
edited. We cannot promise
]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
edited. We cannot promise a release by the end of the year.
We should
, at 9:20 AM, Jörg Schmidt
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 1:18 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
> [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
>
> Playing devil's advocate here: does i
cy and language.
>>>
>>> Patricia, please take a look if you wish.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>> On Dec 27, 2020, at 9:20 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message--
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:13 PM Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog
> > article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article
> > moot with the actual release?
>
> Yes I think it
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
edited. We cannot promise a release by the end of the year.
We should not imply that macOS Big Sur is the only reason for
4.1.9. All platforms
-
>>> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
>>> [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
>>>
>>> P
day, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
>> [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
>>
>> Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
>> edited. We cannot promise a rele
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
edited. We cannot promise a release by the end of the year.
We should not imply that macOS Big Sur is the only reason for
4.1.9. All
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
> [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
>
> Please put Peter’s
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be edited. We cannot
promise a release by the end of the year. We should not imply that macOS Big
Sur is the only reason for 4.1.9. All platforms will benefit.
Thanks for your efforts.
+1 once the text is properly edited.
Regards,
Dave
14 matches
Mail list logo
