Hi,
Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
In case it is not clear where conventions arise in conjunction with
prefixes on XML qualified names, it is the namespace that is bound to
the prefix that establishes the convention. The prefix choice is
relatively arbitrary (but one must avoid unintentional colli
xmlns:field:1.0"
The namespace that is bound to field is unusual. It is not one of the ones
defined as under the authority of OAIS. (Those all begin urn:oasis:names ... .)
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 09
On 14/02/2013 Regina Henschel wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121769 ...
(1) What can we do with regard to license?
If your concern is about conventions (choice of constant definitions and
attribute names) I, personally and as a non-lawyer, wouldn't see it as
problematic:
