Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-22 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2015-11-22 18:29 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton : > Roberto, thanks for this. Comments in-line > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 14:23 > > To: dev >

RE: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Roberto, thanks for this. Comments in-line > -Original Message- > From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 14:23 > To: dev > Subject: Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2] > > 2015-11-21 19:

Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2015-11-21 19:28 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton : > [not cross-posting] > > SourceForge is valuable to the project for providing the mirror capacity > that AOO requires. The penalty is in regard to user distrust and these > awful situations that the list and Forum folks have to contend with. As >

RE: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[not cross-posting] SourceForge is valuable to the project for providing the mirror capacity that AOO requires. The penalty is in regard to user distrust and these awful situations that the list and Forum folks have to contend with. As far as our users are concerned, it is the AOO project tha

Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]

2015-11-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dave Barton wrote: I do not understand, or find any reasonable explanation, why our download page does not redirect to the ASF's own mirror network: https://www.apache.org/mirrors/ where our binaries are already being served by 200+ mirrors around the world. Leaving all the SourceForge discussi