Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
On 15/12/2014 Pedro Giffuni wrote: Il giorno 14/dic/2014, alle ore 17:20, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. ... I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. I'm CCing Pedro who told me something similar (possibly the very same issue) Yes. According to my records the PMC was notified OK, I verified that everything builds fine without it and I removed main/writerperfect: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1648122 Please note that the status is not completely clear, see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118919 for more (but if we are not using it, maybe the discussion is not worth it anyway). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
Correction: The RAT scan linked to in the [VOTE] message for 4.1.1 lists only seven files for aoo410/main/writerperfect. (not aoo401) -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 17:00 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.) OK, here is why I was looking for this. Thanks for the links, Kay. The RAT scan linked to in the [VOTE] message for 4.1.1 lists only seven files for aoo401/main/writerperfect. Looking in the apache-openoffice-4.1.1-r1517669-src.zip, I see 33 files that could have comments and notices. Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/writerperfect/ as well as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. I'm no expert on RAT. I can't account for the peculiar situation. I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 15:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.) On 12/13/2014 01:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking around for some other matters, I notice there is no 4.1.1 branch in the SVN. Is this intentional? yes...see the following mail threads http://markmail.org/message/qrjxespr3di7dxh7 http://markmail.org/message/cpqm4zysz4sd4ley [ ... ] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/writerperfect/ as well as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. ... I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. I'm CCing Pedro who told me something similar (possibly the very same issue) at ApacheCon last month. If I understand correctly, these files are unused for the build and should simply be removed. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
I agree. If the build doesn't depend on them being there in some manner, simple removal of the writerperfect directory from the trunk should be sufficient. If there is a config dependency for creating builds, that should be removed as well. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 14:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni Subject: Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.) On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/writerperfect/ as well as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. ... I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. I'm CCing Pedro who told me something similar (possibly the very same issue) at ApacheCon last month. If I understand correctly, these files are unused for the build and should simply be removed. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
Hello; Il giorno 14/dic/2014, alle ore 17:20, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org ha scritto: On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/writerperfect/ as well as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. ... I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. I'm CCing Pedro who told me something similar (possibly the very same issue) at ApacheCon last month. If I understand correctly, these files are unused for the build and should simply be removed. Regards, Andrea. Yes. According to my records the PMC was notified about a couple of licensing issues, including this one, on March 12, 2014. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
On 12/13/2014 01:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking around for some other matters, I notice there is no 4.1.1 branch in the SVN. Is this intentional? yes...see the following mail threads http://markmail.org/message/qrjxespr3di7dxh7 http://markmail.org/message/cpqm4zysz4sd4ley - Dennis -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 12:45 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Budapest and thereafter. On 08/12/2014 jan i wrote: So may I politely ask, what have changed, that we now believe this will all go away, and we can have it all solved in a short time ? Not much has changed indeed. I pushed to have buildbots running before the release, but indeed if buildbots are problematic and the same volunteers who built the previous releases can still commit to doing so for the next one, it is no major problem. Very honestly, I would like that we don't depend on individuals for project resources, but maybe it is easier for a developer to share an existing virtual machine (and possibly get it running at Apache) than to prepare a buildbot environment. do we really want to wait until this magically happens ? No, since it won't magically happen. So, what is the minimum we can do for a 4.1.2 release? I would set it at: - New/updated translations - New/updated dictionaries - Bugfixes (to be discussed) - Signed Windows binaries - Binaries for all other systems as usual I can volunteer for the first two items (coordinating translations and adding/updating dictionaries). But I'm actually missing some information maybe. Out of the following releases, which ones were built on individuals' machines for 4.1.1? All? Some? And are these built in a VM that we could consider moving to Apache hardware or not? 1) Windows 2) Linux 64 bit (RPM+DEB) 3) Linux 32 bit (RPM+DEB) 4) Mac Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK There's a bit of magic in everything, and some loss to even things out. -- Lou Reed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
OK, here is why I was looking for this. Thanks for the links, Kay. The RAT scan linked to in the [VOTE] message for 4.1.1 lists only seven files for aoo401/main/writerperfect. Looking in the apache-openoffice-4.1.1-r1517669-src.zip, I see 33 files that could have comments and notices. Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/writerperfect/ as well as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. I'm no expert on RAT. I can't account for the peculiar situation. I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 15:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.) On 12/13/2014 01:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking around for some other matters, I notice there is no 4.1.1 branch in the SVN. Is this intentional? yes...see the following mail threads http://markmail.org/message/qrjxespr3di7dxh7 http://markmail.org/message/cpqm4zysz4sd4ley [ ... ] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
