Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-12-04 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy Rob, Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la: IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-29 Thread Drew Jensen
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I have no idea. Should we? Sorry for the delay. Well, it rather depends on what you are trying to do - I doubt that in this instance it would make much sense. Anyhow, it is rather a different subject from the listing

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-29 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I have no idea. Should we? Sorry for the delay. Well, it rather depends on what you are trying to do - I doubt that in this instance it

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-29 Thread Drew Jensen
Drat - I'm so far behind *laughing*.. The answer is no. I did just download it however and will look when I get home. Thanks again On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue,

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-29 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat,

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-29 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-28 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-26 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello *, From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] So...this thread does not meet lazy consensus but are we ready to implement this addition, without further changes, anyway? I'll be happy to take care of this either later today or tomorrow if we are. Can you please summarize what

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-26 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello *, From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] So...this thread does not meet lazy consensus but are we ready to implement this addition, without further changes, anyway? I'll be happy to take care

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-26 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello *, From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] So...this thread does not meet lazy consensus but are we ready to implement this

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-26 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello *, From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-26 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-25 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 10/23/2013 12:04 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensendrewjensen.inbox@gmail.**comdrewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy Rob, Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-22 Thread Drew Jensen
Howdy Rob, Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la: IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications. A couple of quick questions if I may. Will the support only be available to those with the IBM connectors? IIRC that was the plan in the

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-22 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.comwrote: Howdy Rob, Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la: IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-22 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy Rob, Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la: IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications. I've put in a request to get that page updated. A couple

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 10/23/2013 12:04 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensendrewjensen.in...@gmail.comwrote: Howdy Rob, Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la: IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications. FYI on the

Submission for consultants page

2013-10-21 Thread Rob Weir
consultant nameIBM/name countryGlobal/country practiceDevelopment/practice practiceSupport/practice practiceTraining/practice descriptionIBM® Support for Apache OpenOffice offers expert technical support for Apache OpenOffice. With trusted IBM

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rob Weir wrote: consultant nameIBM/name countryGlobal/country ... /consultant Received. Subject to lazy consensus as usual, we can add it to the Consultants page in 72 hours. Regards, Andrea. -

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-21 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Received. Subject to lazy consensus as usual, we can add it to the Consultants page in 72 hours. In this Case unfortunately: -1 (But I do not know if I can vote here) Sorry, but I think the website does not comply with the

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rob Weir wrote: In the context of the page it makes full acknowledgement of where Apache OpenOffice is from. The page footer, or the last paragraph of the text, could still explain that Apache OpenOffice is a trademark of the Apache Software Foundation. This is not confusing to users and

Re: Submission for consultants page

2013-10-21 Thread Jörg Schmidt
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sorry, but I think the website does not comply with the necessary formalities. Always has been emphasized, these are marked on the relevant websites trademark of Apache, for example: IBM Support for Apache OpenOffice TM and not