[mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 10:58
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Third-Party ALv2 Dependencies (RE: Limiting Trademark Policy
Discussion ...)
Thanks, Andrea.
I see what is questioned about that page.
This folder also appears on the AOO410 branch and I assume i
ennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 09:28
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Third-Party ALv2 Dependencies (RE: Limiting Trademark Policy
Discussion ...)
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I cannot find direct
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I cannot find directory main/ooo_custom_images on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main and there is
nothing similar on the web site.
It's there at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/industrial/README
and (nicer)
h
...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 07:16
To: orc...@apache.org; Apache OO
Subject: Re: Third-Party ALv2 Dependencies (RE: Limiting Trademark Policy
Discussion ...)
Hi again Dennis;
I stopped using AOO's bugzilla after an unconfortable incident.
Since the PMC was notified twice about
Hi again Dennis;
I stopped using AOO's bugzilla after an unconfortable incident.
Since the PMC was notified twice about it, I will just make it public.
You should take a look at:
main/ooo_custom_images/industrial/README
Pedro.
On 30/08/2015 10:57 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Dennis;
I find
ALv2 Dependencies (RE: Limiting Trademark Policy
Discussion ...)
[ ... ]
Considering your personal remark are you referring to clause 4 (a) and
(d)? IANAL
and that's someone else's job at the ASF, but I didn't find those in the
root tree
of a certain third party, which is where I wou
Hi Dennis;
I find your posting somewhat confusing as the topic would indicate something
different from the body of the message.
I agree in observation 5 that the ASF (actually I can only speak
partially for AOO)
does *not* police the use of ALv2 content by third parties. This, of
course, doesn
st 30, 2015 12:41
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Third-Party ALv2 Dependencies (RE: Limiting Trademark Policy
Discussion ...)
I appreciate all your diligence about licenses. It is valuable. Whatever you
want to call this thread ...
One intention was to discuss what if anything is
I appreciate all your diligence about licenses. It is valuable. Whatever you
want to call this thread ...
One intention was to discuss what if anything is required with respect to
trademarks when ANY third party product is (re)based on Apache OpenOffice.
For example it cannot be called OpenOffi
>From the Chair,
I need to speak up about the "rebasing" business.
1. Use of the ALv2 has nothing to do with trademarks, so this conversation
should be on a separate thread.
2. However, it probably should not be held here and certainly not privately by
the PMC. If someone wants to pursue
10 matches
Mail list logo