Rene Engelhard wrote:
We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap
If you want to be taken serious you should stop to use offending words
like the ones above. If you have some valid complaints about Mozilla or
the way how we use you can do this in a civilized manor.
The problem is not Mozilla
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
On other platforms there is no global key store, that's the reason why
we have chosen to rely on a Mozilla profile.
what about GNOME keyring, Apple KeyChain, .. ?
I think this assumption is no longer valid.
- Oliver
Hi Rene,
We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap (remember: we still are shipping
a
unmaintained, old, unsupported, security-buggy version), also for LDAP
access, but
that's an other story...
Glad to hear you volunteer to work on this, it is definitely most
welcome. For both the
You might be true about Apple (which is not in my personal focus - any
volunteers?), but some GNOME stuff doesn't help for people using KDE or
other things...
Malte.
Oliver Braun wrote, On 10/19/06 08:55:
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
On other platforms there is no global key store,
The area of certificate verification is very complex. There are
different RFCs and other specifications, as well as different
requirements in separate countries (e.g. German Signature Law). I
haven't seen so far a statement that either Microsoft or Mozilla
guarantee 100 % compliance to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap
If you want to be taken serious you should stop to use offending words
like the ones above. If you have some valid complaints about Mozilla or
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
We should try to get rid of the Mozilla crap (remember: we still are
shipping a
unmaintained, old, unsupported, security-buggy version), also for LDAP
access, but
that's an other
Hello James,
you may want to post it on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Charles.
James Courtier-Dutton a écrit :
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
scanelf is a tool one can use to find which programs have an executable
stack. For security reasons, and executable stack should be avoided if
at all
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
scanelf is a tool one can use to find which programs have an executable
stack. For security reasons, and executable stack should be avoided if
at all possible.
scanelf -Rqe /usr/lib/openoffice/*
results in a lot of openoffice having an
Hello guys,
Why don't developers make some plugin for MS Office so it could open
*.odt and other OpenOffice files?
It's a problem, when someone make and send *.otd file in a e-mail, when
receipent doesn't have OpenOffice installed.
Often a receipent don't know or doesn't want to install
From: Jan Breuer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:48:16 +0200
Hello Jan,
I partially stripped CC: list to relevant lists only.
Could you provide me some detailed documents(info) about above
mentioned points and other interesting materials (desings etc.) about
Hi Frank,
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:35 +0200, Frank Schönheit wrote:
In this case, Uwe would have told you that various documentation would
need to be updated, to keep the product consistent
So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the
less likely any decision
On Friday 20 October 2006 7:14 am, Michael Meeks wrote:
As I say, of the ~million or so users that have been exposed to the
outdated help in this area, none I know of have noticed or cared enough
to actually file a bug.
In general people are amazed when they find a help system actually
Hi Malte,
On Thursday, 2006-10-19 09:53:52 +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote:
You might be true about Apple (which is not in my personal focus - any
volunteers?), but some GNOME stuff doesn't help for people using KDE or
other things...
GnuPG, window manager independent, runs on quite a few
14 matches
Mail list logo
