Re: [dev] documentation for filter flags?

2006-10-26 Thread Andreas Schlüns
Allen Pulsifer schrieb: NOTINCHOOSER excludes it from the filter dialog, the awful dialog you get when OOo can't find a filter. Hello Mathias, Thank you, that is helpful. Is there sample file somewhere that causes OOo to bring up the filter dialog? I wanted to test NOTINCHOOSER but I'm

Re: [dev] Re: documentation for filter flags?

2006-10-26 Thread Andreas Schlüns
Allen Pulsifer schrieb: NOTINCHOOSER excludes it from the filter dialog, the awful dialog you get when OOo can't find a filter. Hello Markus, Thank you for the hint on how to force the filter chooser dialog to appear. I was able to confirm that the NOTINCHOOSER flag does not work, and entered

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ... what about a wiki?

2006-10-26 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This doesn't mean we can't freeze the spec once all stakeholders agree it's final, or call it make a snapshot, by moving the Wiki content to a .odt at some time. Sure. There's a bunch of tools that export (Media)Wiki

[dev] Bad PRJNAMEs

2006-10-26 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Hi all, Each makefile.mk needs to set PRJNAME to the name of the (CVS) module it is contained in. That is for example used by the MODULES_WITH_WARNINGS lists, listing those modules (i.e., PRJNAMEs) which are still to be compiled without warnings=errors. There are occasionally cases where a

Re: [dev] paths configuration in v2.0.4

2006-10-26 Thread Andreas Schlüns
Allen Pulsifer schrieb: Hello Joerg, Thank you for your response. Just to respond further: The Current/Default distinction in that place was misguided. That should really be achieved via layering. I agree with this. There are other places in OOo where dynamically created keys have such

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-26 Thread Nikolai Pretzell
Nikolai Pretzell schrieb: Hi Thorsten, Sorry for the german language posting, was not intended to be here. Nikolai - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion

2006-10-26 Thread Bjoern Milcke
Hi Stephan, Bjoern Milcke wrote: Hi Stephan, I came across the following piece of code: String a; xub_StrLen n = 0; n += a.Len(); This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss of data

Re: [dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion

2006-10-26 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Bjoern Milcke wrote: Hi Stephan, Bjoern Milcke wrote: Hi Stephan, I came across the following piece of code: String a; xub_StrLen n = 0; n += a.Len(); This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT',

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ... what about a wiki?

2006-10-26 Thread Christian Jansen
Hi David, from a feature documentation standpoint it makes no difference to use the template, a wiki, a HTML page, or what ever comes into your mind. It is more important that the UI feature and its functionality is described well. I personally think a wiki is absolutely fine to do that, but

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ... what about a wiki?

2006-10-26 Thread Christian Jansen
Hi David, from a feature documentation standpoint it makes no difference to use the template, a wiki, a HTML page, or what ever comes into your mind. It is more important that the UI feature and its functionality is described well. I personally think a wiki is absolutely fine to do that, but

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ... what about a wiki?

2006-10-26 Thread Christian Jansen
David Fraser schrieb: Kazunari Hirano wrote: Hi, Frank Schönheit wrote: However, what I really *really* like about this process is the exchange of ideas and arguments. I respect the process. I encourage community developers and CJK developers to access the spec project wiki [1] and the spec

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ... what about a wiki?

2006-10-26 Thread Christian Jansen
Hi David, from a feature documentation perspective it makes no difference to use the template, a wiki, a HTML page, or what ever comes into your mind. I think it is more important that the UI feature and its functionality is described in well mannor. I personally think a wiki is absolutely

[dev] cancel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-10-26 Thread Christian . Jansen
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] cancel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-10-26 Thread Christian . Jansen
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] how to show printerSetup-Dialog without Dispatches?

2006-10-26 Thread Christoph Lutz
Hi, is it possible to show the printerSetup-Dialog (File-Printer Setup...) using the api (and not the dispatch-framework)? best regards, Christoph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-26 Thread Christian Jansen
Hi, as mentioned in [EMAIL PROTECTED] The issues will be fixed as soon as the developer is back from vacation (which will be next week). Regards, Christian Kazunari Hirano schrieb: Hi, Frank Schönheit wrote: However, what I really *really* like about this process is the exchange of ideas

[dev] a11y writing systems

2006-10-26 Thread Jonathon Blake
All: What would be the best way to get Braille, Moon, and ASl included as optional writing systems in OOo/SO? [Braille would include Braille 0, Braille 1, Braille 1.5, Braille 2, Braille 2.5, Braille 3, Nemeth Code ] * Submit a request for Braille as an language of its own, with one request

[dev] Error in Openoffice Build

2006-10-26 Thread Indraveni
Hi, I am building Openoffice-2.0.3 form scratch on the Debian OS. I am following the instructions given in the following site http://tools.openoffice.org/dev_docs/build_linux.html. In the dmake step, I got the following error: /opt/Indraveni/OOC680_m7/vcl/source/glyphs