Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Thorsten Behrens wrote: Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, but any reference counter increase/decrease still needs to be atomic as long as they are not thread local? How can we replace them with plain integer operations? Hi Heiner, well, when shared only within _one_ UTF2

Re: [dev] Bounty for performance improvements

2006-11-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Hi Michael, With UTF2 you mean Uno Threading Framework 2? I can see how it helps the performance if we reduce mutex locking (especially Solar-Mutex, of course) but naively I would assume that reference counter as programming concept are mostly independent from

Re: [dev] Built and now what ?

2006-11-07 Thread Jim Watson
On 07/11/2006, at 10:30 AM, Jim Watson wrote: Enno, I think the best thing would be to download the released installation that matches your solver version and use that one to drop in your changes. Enno, i dont any other ideas. I am now downloading the 2.0.4 solver for linux/intel,

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Kay, I have created an extension for the Firefox browser. It adds a new main menu with a list of OpenOffice.org related URLs and it adds a search context menu to the IssuesZilla and OO.o search engine. It is an easy way to access the OpenOffice.org web page Please find more on the Wiki

Re: [dev] changing the OOo-Configuration via API has no effect during runtime

2006-11-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Niklas Nebel wrote: Mathias Bauer wrote: Are you sure that it doesn't affect even new documents you create later? Then it would be a bug (Writer having a cached value that doesn't react on changes of the configuration) and you should create an issue. One may call it a bug, but it's not

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Jim Watson
On 07/11/2006, at 8:40 PM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Kay, I have created an extension for the Firefox browser. It adds a new main menu with a list of OpenOffice.org related URLs and it adds a search context menu to the IssuesZilla and OO.o search engine. It is an easy way to access the

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jim, I have created an extension for the Firefox browser. It adds a new main menu with a list of OpenOffice.org related URLs and it adds a search context menu to the IssuesZilla and OO.o search engine. It is an easy way to access the OpenOffice.org web page Please find more on the Wiki

[dev] instsetoo_native build failure

2006-11-07 Thread Enno Fennema
My build instsetoo_native fails in packimages when looking for *.png files in $SRCROOT/default_images/res/commandimagelist as no default_images subdirectory or link exists. The environment variable RSCDEFIMG is set in settings.mk to 'default_images'. Should this be some other value ? What

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Vojta
On 11/3/06, Kay Koll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am planning to publish the extension on the Mozilla Extension page in the next couple of weeks. Nice one. I use simple IssueZilla search engine for Firefox for fast IZ access. http://ooo.izycg.cz/firefox/ooo-issues/ooo-issues.(src|png) --

Re: [dev] Specifications - summary suggestions ...

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Sievers
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote: + specifications are critical for (at a minimum): + file formats + complex / unfamiliar behaviours + behaviour changes affecting other's work (e.g. the automated gui testing is extremely dependent to the basics of OOo) * (Perhaps)

Re: [dev] An attempt of a summary: specification process possibilities

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Sievers
Hi Mathias, Mathias Bauer wrote: Possibly we can establish a process that allows for more asynchronous work or creates the documentation in a QA style (QA or documentation ask for the information they need instead of forcing the developers to provide everything upfront). As some of us have

[dev] is it possible to switch off auto-numbering via api for already opened documents

2006-11-07 Thread Christoph Lutz
Hi, I just recently asked in another thread whether it is possible to set the option ShowHiddenChar for already opened textdocuments. The result was that setting this property via api is not possible at the moment (therefore I submitted a bugreport). Now I would like to know If I can switch off

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ... - unit testing

2006-11-07 Thread Christoph Neumann
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: I hack on a module I like to try and find these tests, I poke in 'workben' and I see very frequently stale/un-buildable/un-runable code, then I poke in qa/ and eg. in configmgr/qa/unoapi I see a makefile.mk I 'dmake' that, something happens and it barfs:

Re: [dev] Specifications - summary suggestions ...

2006-11-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Niklas Nebel wrote: Kohei Yoshida wrote: On 11/3/06, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's put it that way: it should be possible to integrate something even if the original goal laid out in the spec wasn't reached but the result is good enough. Good enough means that we could live

Re: [dev] An attempt of a summary: specification process possibilities

2006-11-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Joerg Sievers wrote: Hi Mathias, Mathias Bauer wrote: Possibly we can establish a process that allows for more asynchronous work or creates the documentation in a QA style (QA or documentation ask for the information they need instead of forcing the developers to provide everything

Re: [dev] An attempt of a summary: specification process possibilities

2006-11-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Michael Meeks wrote: Nope, seems a good summary; one of the ideas I came up with was of splitting the work-flow aspects [ step1: create iTeam, step2: design, step 3: review, step 4: implement ] etc. from the other pieces that are necessary for QA / docs / i18n etc. ie. providing