Re: Re: [dev] Can we use AWT in our product?

Hi Juergen Thank you for your help and suggestion. The product we are to develop will use C++ for developing language. It's purely new, also we lack experiences for cross-platform. So we prefer to use AWT. What we are consider is whether AWT is allowed to use in a commercial software. Can you

Re: [dev] xTextDocument clone

Hi Dinesh, Dinesh Chothe wrote: I am doing like this for creating text documents object, com.sun.star.text.XTextDocument xTextDocument =(com.sun.star.text.XTextDocument)UnoRuntime.queryInterface(

Re: [dev] Can we use AWT in our product?

Hi Lizhan! Well I am not a lawyer but well it´s LGPL so principally you could use it as long as you stick to the LGPL license terms. For example you must make sure that anyone can get the source code of the libraries you use which can be easily done by providing just a link to the

Re: Re: [dev] Can we use AWT in our product?

On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 14:44 +0800, LiZhan(李湛) wrote: Hi Juergen Thank you for your help and suggestion. The product we are to develop will use C++ for developing language. It's purely new, also we lack experiences for cross-platform. So we prefer to use AWT. I would be you, I'd just

Re: [dev] Where to find cvs tag for the three-layer patch? FIXED

Juergen Schmidt writes: [For the archives] Try simply UNO_TYPES=file:.../ure/share/misc/types.rdb file:///.../basis3.0/program/offapi.rdb UNO_SERVICES=file:.../ure/share/misc/services.rdb file:///.../basis3.0/program/services.rdb It should still work and i hope that is enough.

Re: [dev] Can we use AWT in our product?

Hi Juergen, after recent discussions with other open source people, it seems that perception of OOo is not optimal in the FLOSS world. If I understood correctly, we may be able to improve that, if we spin-off parts of our technology, e.g. as we did / are doing with Uno. So, even if VCL and

Re: [dev] VCL UI Rework

On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:15 +0200, Christian Lippka wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: There was some resistance to nominating this for 3.0 because ChristianL wanted to re-do the translation work to use Java Properties instead of the new transex tool we wrote that translated complete XML

Re: [dev] VCL UI Rework

Hi Jurgen, On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:12 +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: whatever we will use in the future it will be important that we will have a GUI editor to make the design of new dialogs much more easier than today. Yep; absolutely - it's in the spec. and we have a

Re: [dev] VCL UI Rework

Hi Michael, On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:12 +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: whatever we will use in the future it will be important that we will have a GUI editor to make the design of new dialogs much more easier than today. Yep; absolutely - it's in the spec. and we have a

[dev] Development at a Glance - Weekly Update CW21

Hi, here is the weekly update for calendar week 21: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/development_at_a_glance_weekly47 Regards, Dieter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [dev] Development at a Glance - Weekly Update CW21

correction: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/development_at_a_glance_weekly48 Regards, Dieter Dieter Loeschky wrote: Hi, here is the weekly update for calendar week 21: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/development_at_a_glance_weekly47 Regards, Dieter