[dev] [PATCH] Fix typo

2008-07-02 Thread Fredrik Roubert
Hi! I just happened to notice a typo in Helper.java while browsing the source code. See attached patch. (I'm not on the mailing list, in case someone feels like replying.) Cheers // Fredrik Roubert -- Teglbrennerveien 7b | +47 41266295 NO-7013 Trondheim| http://www.df.lth.se/~roubert/

[dev] Proposal : tar.gz packages for Linux as default for CWS builds

2008-07-02 Thread Thorsten Ziehm
Hi, in the past some requests came up to have also DEB packages beside RPM packages, when a build from a Child Work Space (CWS) has to be tested by the community. This is a valid request, because the Linux Distributions with DEB packages increased. But does it make sense to increase the time

[dev] OpenOffice.org 3.x

2008-07-02 Thread Stefan H. Reissmann
Dear Sir or Madam: Some weeks ago, I have installed the developmental version of OpenOffice 3.0 on my computer. Today I wanted to report some fault or shortcomings, I have found during the last days. However, I have found it difficult, to find the right address for this on your webpages,

Re: [dev] Proposal : tar.gz packages for Linux as default for CWS builds

2008-07-02 Thread Mathias Bauer
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: The Proposal : The default format for CWS builds on Linux should be tar.gz (instead of RPM). It should still be possible to create install sets as RPM or DEB or both. Thanks for your proposal, I really like it. As long as everybody still can build rpm or

Re: [dev] OpenOffice.org 3.x

2008-07-02 Thread Frank Meies
Hi Stefan, On 02.07.08 14:35, Stefan H. Reissmann wrote: thank you for your feedback. Please find my comments below: Writer: • In the 2.x versions, I had problems with links in websites. They often did not work for unknown reasons. did you make sure to press CTRL while clicking on the

Re: [dev] Proposal : tar.gz packages for Linux as default for CWS builds

2008-07-02 Thread Rail Aliev
On Wednesday 02 July 2008 17:33:09 Mathias Bauer wrote: The Proposal : The default format for CWS builds on Linux should be tar.gz (instead of RPM). It should still be possible to create install sets as RPM or DEB or both. Thanks for your proposal, I really like it. As long as everybody

[dev] Certificate database architecture for NSS in Openoffice

2008-07-02 Thread Ruchi Lohani
Hi, Can anybody explain me how Open office uses the certificate database for NSS ssl communication? I see that initially it used the cert8.db from the Mozilla or Thunderbird profile directory and there was a bug filed to improve this as it can be erroneous from Berkeley db point of view. Can

Re: [dev] Certificate database architecture for NSS in Openoffice

2008-07-02 Thread Malte Timmermann
Since it's 100% the same question you asked yesterday: See my answer from yesterday, or rephrase. Make sure to be subscribed to the list, otherwise per default you won't get the answers... Malte. Ruchi Lohani wrote, On 02.07.08 18:07: Hi, Can anybody explain me how Open office uses the

RE: [dev] Certificate database architecture for NSS in Openoffice

2008-07-02 Thread Ruchi Lohani
Thanks for the reply. I am subscribed now. One more thing I couldn't understand is if open office uses the same database files from thunderbird, mozilla or say firefox, will it be good to do that? As far as I understood from NSS, since these databases are not sharable its not recommended to use

Re: [dev] Certificate database architecture for NSS in Openoffice

2008-07-02 Thread Malte Timmermann
OOo isn't intended to manage certificates. IMHO every user should have only *one* key store for being used from all apps, with central/system management tools. Unfortunately we don't have the ideal situation anywhere: Windows offers such a central place, but at least Mozilla doesn't make use of

[dev] NetBeans setup for sdk

2008-07-02 Thread Terrence Enger
Greetings. I am trying to use NetBeans 6.0.1 and the OpenOffice API Plugin version 1.1.1 with locally compiled DEV300_m19. I have installed from locally-created .rpm's and applied minimal hacks into /home/terry/OOo_hacking/DEV300_m19_localbuild/, and I have moved the unpacked sdk to

Re: [dev] Proposal : tar.gz packages for Linux as default for CWS builds

2008-07-02 Thread Caio Tiago Oliveira
Rail Aliev, 02-07-2008 12:28: On Wednesday 02 July 2008 17:33:09 Mathias Bauer wrote: The Proposal : The default format for CWS builds on Linux should be tar.gz (instead of RPM). It should still be possible to create install sets as RPM or DEB or both. Thanks for your proposal, I

Re: [dev] Proposal : tar.gz packages for Linux as default for CWS builds

2008-07-02 Thread Robert Vojta
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Rail Aliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From QA POV it will be very useful. You can install (unpack) more than 1 version of OOo. Just a side note ... You can install more than one version of OOo today too. a) Unpack RPM packages with rpm2cpio Usage: rpm2cpio