On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 16:01 +0100, Éric Bischoff wrote:
> Qt is cute, modern, C++, easy to program with, and multiplatform.
> Wouldn't it
> be the ideal replacement for VCL, now that LGPL is an option?
>
> No flames please.
Are you volunteering to do the work?
Hub
---
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 00:09 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> See also https://www.ohloh.net/forums/11/topics/1103
>
> It might do better in future once the responsible person with
> permissions to edit the project switched the repository to SVN, but
> I have my doubts it will cope with our /cws/* struc
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 15:57 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> or, if it is intentional, introduce some white-space to silence gcc,
> e.g. from
>
> for (int nCount = 0; nCount++ != nIndex; ++nCount, ++p);
> to
> for (int nCount = 0; nCount++ != nIndex; ++nCount, ++p) ;
>
> FWIW, I've filed individua
Michael Strobel wrote:
Hi All,
Which way do you debug OOo? I currently wanted to perform a full build
of OOo 2.4 with debug=true, but ran into multiple problems e.g. during
packing of the install set under .../instset_native, while there are no
problems with the build when I don't set debug=t
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 14:44 +0800, LiZhan(李湛) wrote:
> Hi Juergen
> Thank you for your help and suggestion.
> The product we are to develop will use C++ for developing language. It's
> purely new, also we lack experiences for cross-platform. So we prefer to use
> AWT.
I would be you, I'd just a
> I also hope that the "real free" [TM] Java will be available in a not so
> distant future, perhaps when OOo 3.0 is due. And rumours are that this
> is very probable. So IMHO Java should become a valid option for all
> components that are loaded on demand only and that are not necessary for
> eve
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 18:24 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> In case anyone came up with a useful, professional and maintained
> alternative that is guaranteed to run at least on the four main
> platforms we could have a look on it. Without that I'd prefer to
> utilize
> Sesame. Of course somebody el
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0?
Unfavorable.
(this is a personal opinion)
OOo is often strongly criticized by its weight (bloat) and slowliness
(bloat). This would just add to it. I always considered t
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 08:29 +0800, Harish Pillay wrote:
> Hi. I am trying to ascertain the issues behind oo.o as it stands
> today in not having support for the m$ docx, xlsx and pptx formats.
> It is not important at all for me to have oo.o support those, but
> Novell claims to have done the wor
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:51 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> A quite practical situation, even if the terms of the JCA themselves
> could certainly be improved. But after all you know the benefits of
> such copyright covenants, as Gnome and Evolution provide their
> developers with similar
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 07:16 -0800, weekendadventure wrote:
> Coating by StarOffice is
> still a violation
Sun own the copyright of OpenOffice.org. Therefore they are not required
to abide to the (L)GPL for code they own.
Similarly, they can relicense the code under a different license to
whoever
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:11 +0100, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
> I assume that also people who paid for the office also get no access
> to
> the source code.
Not that it really matters, but as long as they redistribute a software
covered by (L)GPL, the requirement of section 3 of the license still
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 07:42 -0700, Saqlain Abbas wrote:
> 1) The resultant pdf file should be readonly.
> 2) The resultant pdf file should be password protected.
> 3) The User should not be able to copy text from resultant pdf file.
> 4) The User should not be able to print resultant pdf file.
>
Hi,
I forgot, but tinderbox moved to http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/
There is a redirector on the old URL that should work with most HTTP
client (including wget, curl and Perl)
Please update if possible.
Hub
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 08:54 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
>
> That was also feed back from the audience, during the IBM
> Presentation
> at OOoCon.
> The IBM people took good notice of it. Seemed like they are gooing to
> change it.
Because the community can't. Hint. Hint.
Hub
---
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:56 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> To all the OpenOffice users who might be interesting in trying out IBM
> Lotus
> Symphony (Beta):
>
>DO NOT INSTALL IBM Lotus Symphony (Beta) !!!
Here the TnstallShield crash and let a process running with a high CPU
load from /tmp
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 18:22 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Philipp Lohmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just as a side note: which added value does rtl::Reference provide over
> > boost::shared_ptr anyway ?
>
> rtl::Reference requirs T to have acquire() and release(), whereas
> boost::shared_ptr ma
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:29 -0700, Rotsen Marcello wrote:
> I've developed a new OpenOffice Language Binding as a PhP module, using
> the Uno Reflection API / C++, and I have a few questions that maybe some of
> you can answer:
>
> 1) OpenOffice is LGPL but I wish to release the mo
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:45 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
>
> In poking around a bit this week, I found that the standard C++
> library
> (currently a draft standard called "TR1") now includes regexp
> classes.
> There are already two open-source implementations of this standard
> library, including
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So I was wondering to whom would I submit my suggestion to?
You can use issue tracker. (need to register first, it is free)
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html
That way the issue is tracked and everybody can fo
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:53 +0800, Youzhi Hu wrote:
> Hello ,everybody! This is the first time I come here.I want to
> join the development of OpenOffice and I am very interested in how
> OpenOffice handles MS office file format.I have download the source
> code of openoffice,but I don't kn
21 matches
Mail list logo
