Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, yes, the way how extensions are loaded has changed a little bit. Related to this change the search of dependent jar becomes more important. Extensions are now loaded with their own classloader and you have to specify dependent jars in the manifest file of your extension jar. I see!

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Hi Rony, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi there, just installed RC2 and a scripting language extension for ooRexx (ScriptProviderForooRexx.jar) which was built for earlier versions of OOo (2.1, 2.2) and which works fine there. Installing it with the Extension Manger and alternatively with unopkg

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Jürgen, yes, the way how extensions are loaded has changed a little bit. Related to this change the search of dependent jar becomes more important. Extensions are now loaded with their own classloader and you have to specify dependent jars in the manifest file of

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Juergen Schmidt wrote: How would I state OOo deployed jars in the manifest file (i.e. to point to program/classes/ScriptFramework.jar wherever the program dir resides on a filesystem? (Sorry, if this is a rooky question, but I have not

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Rene Engelhard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Juergen Schmidt wrote: How would I state OOo deployed jars in the manifest file (i.e. to point to program/classes/ScriptFramework.jar wherever the program dir resides on a filesystem? (Sorry, if this is a rooky question,

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Juergen Schmidt wrote: /me has that problem with sun-report-design.oxt and jars not even built by the build process or stuff which will be used from the system anyway. The only solution I found so far is adding them to UNO_JFW_CLASSPATH_URLS

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, By the way you can add the scripting framework jar file manually to the classpath and can check if it works. Just tried it: does not work. Also tried using Rene Engelhards suggestion (UNO_JFW_CLASSPATH_URLS), unfortunately to no avail. Will file an issue. Thanks again for your

Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Jürgen, By the way you can add the scripting framework jar file manually to the classpath and can check if it works. Just tried it: does not work. Also tried using Rene Engelhards suggestion (UNO_JFW_CLASSPATH_URLS), unfortunately to no avail. Will file an issue.

[dev] Filed as Issue # 81445 (Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jürgen, did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too. (Though P1 might have been to high.) Here's the URL: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81445. Regards, ---rony

Re: [dev] Filed as Issue # 81445 (Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Jürgen, did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too. (Though P1 might have been to high.) Here's the URL: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81445.

Re: [dev] Filed as Issue # 81445 (Re: [dev] OOo_2.3.0rc2_20070905 and Scripting Framework: were there any changes there ?

2007-09-10 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Juergen Schmidt wrote: Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Jürgen, did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too. (Though P1 might have been to high.) Here's the URL: