Hi Christian,
Either you did not use a correct version of epm, or your rpm ignores
the no-automatic requirements setting.
Which one is the correct version of epm? I got 4.1 from epmhome.org for the
build.
correct=patched as needed by OOo. At least the older versions of epm
needed a
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Michael Strobel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason I can not install the RPM packages built under a RHEL4 on
that system. The RPM package manager complains about some files missing in
the packages, but they seem to be built properly, e.g.
Hi Christian,
Either you did not use a correct version of epm, or your rpm ignores
the no-automatic requirements setting.
Which one is the correct version of epm? I got 4.1 from epmhome.org for
the build.
Sure that it really is not in the package? As opposed to being listed
in
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Michael Strobel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either you did not use a correct version of epm, or your rpm ignores
the no-automatic requirements setting.
Which one is the correct version of epm? I got 4.1 from epmhome.org for the
build.
Hi All,
For some reason I can not install the RPM packages built under a RHEL4
on that system. The RPM package manager complains about some files
missing in the packages, but they seem to be built properly, e.g.
libvcl680li.so is missing according to the package manager, but at least
it
