Re: [dev] spell check in openoffice

2006-02-01 Thread Thomas Lange
Hi, ... I am a student at Goldsmiths College, University of London (UK), and I am going to be extremely cheeky by asking for your opinion on data structures: It would be much appreciated if you could describe to me the data structure implemented in the OpenOffice.org for spellchecking, and it

Re: [dev] warnings01: -Wnon-virtual-dtor

2006-02-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On Nov 2, 2005, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Hi all, http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56995 shows the following problem: On compilers later than the GCC 3.4.1 we use at Hamburg (e.g., GCC 4.0.2, but from looking at the documentation also GCC 3.4.4), -Wall implies a new

Re: [dev] warnings01: -Wnon-virtual-dtor

2006-02-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Stephan Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The only solution I see is to bite the bullet and globally disable -Wnon-virtual-dtor. Opinions? Hi Stephan, yes, I think so. But I'd still like to have this (and possibly other) warnings in an optional pedantic mode - to be run after warnings01 is

Re: [dev] Preview window with OOoBean ?

2006-02-01 Thread Matthias Benkmann
On 1/31/06, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Benkmann wrote: On 1/31/06, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previews don't have scrollbars in OOo and a preview in OOo always has a fixed part of the document. I thought the Preview mode is the right choice because you

Re: [dev] warnings01: -Wnon-virtual-dtor

2006-02-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Stephan Bergmann wrote: On Nov 2, 2005, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Hi all, http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56995 shows the following problem: On compilers later than the GCC 3.4.1 we use at Hamburg (e.g., GCC 4.0.2, but from looking at the documentation also GCC 3.4.4),

Re: [dev] warnings01: -Wnon-virtual-dtor

2006-02-01 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Malte, On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 13:00:24 +0100, Malte Timmermann wrote: When we are done with warnings01, we should have most warnings in the default warning level. People don't have to use wall=tr anymore, so this one could be a candidate for some extra warning in wall=tr +1 Eike

Re: [dev] Writer Automation with Delphi

2006-02-01 Thread Mathias Bauer
Ale Rufino wrote: Hi Christian, When I send the first message I'm not correctly suscrived and I Think that the message not send. I need to do a Delphi Program that only do a preview of a OpenOffice document with the opcion of print them. The user has no modified then. I use a

Re: [dev] warnings01: -Wnon-virtual-dtor

2006-02-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Malte, On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 13:00:24 +0100, Malte Timmermann wrote: When we are done with warnings01, we should have most warnings in the default warning level. People don't have to use wall=tr anymore, so this one could be a candidate for some extra warning in

Re: [dev] Writer Automation with Delphi

2006-02-01 Thread Ale Rufino
Hi This is a Kiosk application, in witch the user won't be able to see the OppenOffice instance. For this reason I have to write a program that shows to the user the complete document, I can open the document but I can't see the document is in my program. Using a TOleContainer control in Delphi

[dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-01 Thread Chris White
Hi all, I'm currently building Open Office with gcc-4.1.0 20060120 snapshot. It says my compiler is unkown, and to post the configure results ( gcc.hpp:67:7:warning #warning Unknown compiler version... ). However, I'd like to know if the compiler unknown warning is based upon the

Re: [dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-01 Thread Chris White
On Thursday 02 February 2006 08:01, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:32:46 +0900 Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Hi Chris, it won't break because of 'Unknown compiler version' warning. This comes from Gentoos gcc version like 4.1.0-beta20060127

Re: [dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-01 Thread NAKATA Maho
In Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for that status, it's compiled about 75% through (I estimate) and nothin= g's=20 bombed out so far. you seem to have installed SUN or Blackdown's jdk ;) there are some breakages: JAVADOC (need gjdoc) JAVACMD (to use