[dev] Re: documentation for filter flags?
Hi Allen, On 22nd of October 2006 Allen Pulsifer wrote: NOTINCHOOSER excludes it from the filter dialog, the awful dialog you get when OOo can't find a filter. Hello Mathias, Thank you, that is helpful. Is there sample file somewhere that causes OOo to bring up the filter dialog? I wanted to test NOTINCHOOSER but I'm unable to get this dialog to appear. The only time I saw this dialog was, when I tried to open a calc document on a machine with a writer-only installation. If there is no other way, like opening a document with a type not connected to openoffice using the open with ... switch in a file explorer or give such a document as an argument on commandline, then installing OOo with e.g. the writer module only may help. Thanks, Allen Hope this helps. Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
Hi Andy, I'm not sure but I think it's network configuration related (because of the 'gettimeofday' system call). Did you have a look at your /etc/hosts if there is an entry for localhost available ? ...something like 127.0.0.1 localhost and did you check your /etc/nsswitch.conf if the name resolution has the correct order ? Kind regards, Joost - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails
Hi Niklas, On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:40 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: Let me show you why I feel this way, from a simple example I was reading this morning: notice the consultation going on in this issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Had you quoted more, we'd see that the .. part lists some problems with the patch that haven't been resolved. Sure - and they are valuable feedback, much appreciated; and need fixing - but ultimately is there any point if User Experience are the gateway for all changes, and simply don't comment ? On the other hand, it shouldn't turn into I've got an unfinished implementation of something I can't describe, and expect Sun to do all the real work about it. real work ? honestly - do you expect to get perfect 1st patches from people inexperienced with the 'intricacies' of the calc code ? Volunteers for example ( Muthu is an unpaid Indian chap ). If so, I would suggest that is not a realistic expectation. As for not being able to describe what is required, I refuse to accept that adding a single missing key-binding for a single language requires any more detailed description in order for you (or anyone else) to understand it :-) If by real work you mean that the paperwork and interaction involved in getting a small change into OpenOffice.org *far* outweighs the actual time generating the code - then I totally agree with you :-) Some people see that as a feature, I see it as a debilitating bug. On projects I'm interested in developing, if a patch arrives that needs a couple of minor fixes, I would tend to point these out fix them at the same time [ it's often no more effort than locating them in the 1st instance ], test commit. I find it hard to communicate how intensely frustrating the Sun interaction is, but I just thought of an innovative way here, watch this space. You could save yourself a lot of frustration by following a common-sense order of steps: *First* define what a desired feature is, *then* start implementing. Really. Try it. jokeStrange - we have a different process whereby we have no idea what we want to achieve, we just type at random for some weeks, then submit a patch ;- This whole knowing what you want to achieve thing is a revolutionary concept indeed./joke Regards, Michael. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
On Monday 23 October 2006 09:32, Joost Andrae wrote: Hi Andy, I'm not sure but I think it's network configuration related (because of the 'gettimeofday' system call). Thanks for the response, and networking is certainly not my strong point. Did you have a look at your /etc/hosts if there is an entry for localhost available ? ...something like 127.0.0.1 localhost Yes, it is there; the significant lines are: # 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost ipv6-localhost ipv6-loopback fe00::0 ipv6-localnet ff00::0 ipv6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ipv6-allnodes ff02::2 ipv6-allrouters ff02::3 ipv6-allhosts 127.0.0.2 desk.clan desk # and did you check your /etc/nsswitch.conf if the name resolution has the correct order ? This is still the default content from the installation, with significant lines: # # passwd: files nis # shadow: files nis # group: files nis passwd: compat group: compat hosts: files dns networks: files dns services: files protocols: files rpc:files ethers: files netmasks: files netgroup: files publickey: files bootparams: files automount: files nis aliases:files # Which lines are important for this case? It just seems to me that OOo is asking for some service from cupsd in the loop, but that is obviously a pure guess. Andy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] Re: documentation for filter flags?
NOTINCHOOSER excludes it from the filter dialog, the awful dialog you get when OOo can't find a filter. Hello Markus, Thank you for the hint on how to force the filter chooser dialog to appear. I was able to confirm that the NOTINCHOOSER flag does not work, and entered a bug report: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70733 Allen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] paths configuration in v2.0.4
I also submitted two bug reports. http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70688 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70687 Thanks Allen, the developer responsible for this is currently on vacation but he surely will have a look when he is back end of next week. Thanks. I added one more: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70735 Allen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
oops...sorry... Cups administration default port was 631 http://localhost:631 should point you to Cups administration. Kind regards, Joost That only gives Could not connect to host localhost (port 431) whatever user I try. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion
Hi,
I am a bit late with warning-freeness, I just now resynced against a
master build that contains warnings01 and pals. Maybe this problem here
is not new, but I didn't find anything about this.
I came across the following piece of code:
String a;
xub_StrLen n = 0;
n += a.Len();
This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning:
warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss
of data (in the last line of the fragment)
String is a typedef to UniString. UniString::Len() returns xub_StrLen.
So, here we have a xub_StrLen::operator+( xub_StrLen ), which should
work without conversion, no matter what xub_StrLen is. Actually,
xub_StrLen is currently a typedef to USHORT which is a typedef to
sal_uInt16 which is a typedef to unsigned short on Windows.
The only explanation I have for this is that there is no operator+= for
xub_StrLen, therefore the expression is expanded to:
n = (unsinged short)( (int)n + (int)(a.Len()) );
But why? There should be a lossless operator+= (and also +) for unsinged
short. And a typedef should be more or less an alias? And it is a POD
type, too.
Does anybody have an idea what the problem is here?
Rewriting this to
n = n + a.Len();
works. But it doesn't look much different.
Just checked:
unsigned short foo() { return 42; }
void bar()
{
unsigned short n = 0;
n += foo();
}
also creates the warning. So it doesn't have to do with typedefs. This
looks like a compiler bug to me.
Confused,
Bjoern
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
On Monday 23 October 2006 13:28, Joost Andrae wrote: [...] http://localhost:631 should point you to Cups administration. OK, that gets me to the admin page, but as soon as I try any admin tasks, I get an authentication dialogue where neither root no lp allow me in. I get the message: This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the resource (a 401 from the browser). So I don't know at the moment how I can use this interface, nor what I would look for. Regards, Andy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 14:08 +0100, Andy Pepperdine wrote: On Monday 23 October 2006 13:28, Joost Andrae wrote: [...] http://localhost:631 should point you to Cups administration. OK, that gets me to the admin page, but as soon as I try any admin tasks, I get an authentication dialogue where neither root no lp allow me in. I get the message: This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the resource (a 401 from the browser). So I don't know at the moment how I can use this interface, nor what I would look for. Andy, Have you checked with Novell or SuSE support? I ask because I cannot reproduce the problem under FC5 and cups-1.2.4. -- G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenOffice.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[dev] Quickstarter on Linux
Hi, since when do we have a quick-starter for Linux? I thought this was not necessary, as the libraries are kept in memory after the first start anyway, except if a lot of other programs are started meanwhile. So, is it for the first start only? When I install OOo (even the archive version without system integration) on a Linux machine using the Display on a Solaris server, I get the quick-starter icon in the system bar of my Solaris JDS workspace. (Maybe this vanishes after quitting the linux session window) The checkmark Start quick starter on system launch (or the like) is checked. How does this work as a simple (non-root) user? -Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
Sorry. I have no idea. workaround: The environment variable SAL_DISABLE_CUPS set to a value (eg. 1) disables cups use within OpenOffice.org. In that case you can manually configure your printers using OOo's printer administration tool spadmin which you can find within the program directory of OOo. Kind regards, Joost OK, that gets me to the admin page, but as soon as I try any admin tasks, I get an authentication dialogue where neither root no lp allow me in. I get the message: This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the resource (a 401 from the browser). So I don't know at the moment how I can use this interface, nor what I would look for. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion
Hi all,
I came across the following piece of code:
String a;
xub_StrLen n = 0;
n += a.Len();
This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning:
warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss
of data (in the last line of the fragment)
[...]
Just checked:
unsigned short foo() { return 42; }
void bar()
{
unsigned short n = 0;
n += foo();
}
Also checked:
short a = 1;
short b = 2;
a += b; // warning: conversion from int
(Warning: signed short, unsigned short. No warning: signed int, unsigned
int)
This also breaks due to the warning. Hm, looks indeed like there was no
operator += for short but only for int.
-Bjoern
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion
Bjoern Milcke wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit late with warning-freeness, I just now resynced against a
master build that contains warnings01 and pals. Maybe this problem here
is not new, but I didn't find anything about this.
I came across the following piece of code:
String a;
xub_StrLen n = 0;
n += a.Len();
This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning:
warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss
of data (in the last line of the fragment)
String is a typedef to UniString. UniString::Len() returns xub_StrLen.
So, here we have a xub_StrLen::operator+( xub_StrLen ), which should
work without conversion, no matter what xub_StrLen is. Actually,
xub_StrLen is currently a typedef to USHORT which is a typedef to
sal_uInt16 which is a typedef to unsigned short on Windows.
The only explanation I have for this is that there is no operator+= for
xub_StrLen, therefore the expression is expanded to:
n = (unsinged short)( (int)n + (int)(a.Len()) );
But why? There should be a lossless operator+= (and also +) for unsinged
short. And a typedef should be more or less an alias? And it is a POD
type, too.
Does anybody have an idea what the problem is here?
By the holy standard, x += y where x, y are short works by promoting x,
y to int x', y', adding x' + y', converting int x' to short x'' and
assigning x'' back to x. MSC chose to warn about this (about the
potentially lossy converting int x' to short x'' part).
Rewriting this to
n = n + a.Len();
works. But it doesn't look much different.
Yes, MSC does not warn about that one, I guess it is a bug. It does
warn about
n = n + M;
where M is larger than unsigned short.
Just checked:
unsigned short foo() { return 42; }
void bar()
{
unsigned short n = 0;
n += foo();
}
also creates the warning. So it doesn't have to do with typedefs. This
looks like a compiler bug to me.
Its not a bug, its a feature. I also wondered about it at first, but
then started to change some occurrences of x +=/-=/*= to x = x +/-/* y.
Not a nice code change, to be sure of, but at least there were not too
many occurrences. And if you use rtl::OUString instead, the problem
will go away (as its length type is sal_Int32). And, the MSC warning
C4244 is also triggered in other, useful places, so I would not want to
just disable it.
-Stephan
Confused,
Bjoern
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Quickstarter on Linux
Bjoern Milcke wrote: Hi, since when do we have a quick-starter for Linux? I thought this was not Since michael and kendy deemed one necessary and CWS gtkquickstart got integrated in m187. necessary, as the libraries are kept in memory after the first start anyway, except if a lot of other programs are started meanwhile. So, is it for the first start only? You can also launch new documents from the quickstarter. When I install OOo (even the archive version without system integration) on a Linux machine using the Display on a Solaris server, I get the quick-starter icon in the system bar of my Solaris JDS workspace. (Maybe this vanishes after quitting the linux session window) The checkmark Start quick starter on system launch (or the like) is checked. How does this work as a simple (non-root) user? The same way as on windows: on first start you select the icon once to siwtch the quickstarter off and a second time to end it. Kind regards, pl -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day; if you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -- Author unknown - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Problem with OOo XML DOM stuff
Hi all, using the UNO com.sun.star.xml.xpath stuff, I have navigate to a com.sun.star.xml.dom.XElement e representing the OpenOffice.org-minimal-version element within the XML document ---8--- ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? description xmlns=http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006; xmlns:d=http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006; dependencies OpenOffice.org-minimal-version value=2.1 d:name=OpenOffice.org 2.1/ /dependencies /description ---8--- What makes me wonder is that e.getLocalName() is empty when I retrieve the data I need (and I would expect it to be OpenOffice.org-minimal-version instead): e.getNamespaceURI(): http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006; e.getLocalName(): e.getAttribute(value): 2.1 Any hints what is going wrong? -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion
Hi Stephan, I came across the following piece of code: String a; xub_StrLen n = 0; n += a.Len(); This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss of data (in the last line of the fragment) [...] Does anybody have an idea what the problem is here? By the holy standard, x += y where x, y are short works by promoting x, y to int x', y', adding x' + y', converting int x' to short x'' and assigning x'' back to x. MSC chose to warn about this (about the potentially lossy converting int x' to short x'' part). Where is that in the standard? Is there a C-Standard, or is this in the C++-Standard. I couldn't find it. I still think this warning doesn't make sense. I am not interested what the compiler does internally as long as the result is what I expect (adding 60,000 + 60,000 is an overflow and that's what I expect when adding shorts. If a possible overflow would cause a warning, almost any arithmetic operation would have to warn for any type.) I noticed that we didn't have this warning in an m172. Is there a new warning that is responsible for this? Or is this a general warning for possible-loss conversions (I thought we had already some before). Rewriting this to n = n + a.Len(); works. But it doesn't look much different. Yes, MSC does not warn about that one, I guess it is a bug. What? You mean short = short + short is also converted to short = (short)((int) + (int)) ? If it would be a warning, I could never add two short values while having -werror! I can't believe that! Still confused, -Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Quickstarter on Linux
Hi Philipp et all, since when do we have a quick-starter for Linux? I thought this was not Since michael and kendy deemed one necessary and CWS gtkquickstart got integrated in m187. Aha. Was there an announcement? The checkmark Start quick starter on system launch (or the like) is checked. How does this work as a simple (non-root) user? The same way as on windows: on first start you select the icon once to siwtch the quickstarter off and a second time to end it. Yes, I know. That's the only thing I do with the quick-starter, too :-) No, I meant, how can I, as a non-root user, tell the system to start the quick-launcher on startup? That's simply not possible. If the user-startup (login) is meant, the launch would have to be in one of the $HOME/.* files. Is it? Or is this just a fake checkbox? Why don't we have the quick-starter as an optional install item anyway? I usually disable tray-installers on Windows if they are in the setup of a program. -Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] cpu looping in cupsd and soffice.bin
On Monday 23 October 2006 14:54, Joost Andrae wrote: Sorry. I have no idea. workaround: The environment variable SAL_DISABLE_CUPS set to a value (eg. 1) disables cups use within OpenOffice.org. In that case you can manually configure your printers using OOo's printer administration tool spadmin which you can find within the program directory of OOo. Thanks, that workaround works, but it gave me an idea (which I should have tried earlier!). I removed my .openoffice.org directory and started afresh, and the problem did not arise at first. So I looked at what the differences were between my existing settings and the default case. After many false starts, it appears that on my system, the loop does not appear so long as all I do is start and stop OOo after a clean new user setup. As soon as I do anything at all, the loop can be triggered, not necessarily during the first invocation, but on the second and later ones. For instance, just adding a single character to the initial empty document, and then discarding it on exit, instead of saving it, causes the next invocation of OOo to go straight into a loop on a new empty document. In all these cases, I start the writer with openoffice.org-2.0 -writer It has all the hallmarks of an uninitialised variable, making it totally dependent on local circumstances. Regards, Andy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] [Fwd: Re: Vorschlag zur Versserung in der Handhabung des OO]
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ralf Krüger Dr.-Karl-Senft-Str. 7 93142 Maxhütte-Haidhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---BeginMessage--- Hallo Ralf, Am Freitag, 22. September 2006 22:30 schrieben Sie: Hallo Andreas, ich weiß nicht, ob ich bei Dir an der richtigen Adresse für meinen Verbesserungsvorschlag für die Handhabung des OO bin. Bitte leite ihn dann an die entsprechenden Stellen weiter, oder gib mir Bescheid, an wen ich mich mit meinem Vorschlag wenden kann. um einen Verbesserungsvorschlag für OOo einzubringen, mußt Du diesen in dem Issue Tracker eingeben. Dort wird er dann von den Entwicklern gelesen. Für das Bedienen dieses Projekttools ist es erforderlich, dass Du Dich kostenlos bei OOo registrierst, da über die Mailadresse, die mit dem Namen generiert wird (Weiterleitungsadresse), die Bearbeiter des Issue (auch die Entwickler) bei Dir nachfragen können. Eine Einführung in das Tool findest Du z.B. hier: http://de.openoffice.org/dev/issuezilla_einfuehrung.html Ich arbeite seit rund 14 Jahren mit der LotusSmartSuite als Office-Programm am Desktop (Textverarbeitung, Datenbank, Tabellenkalkulation, Präsentation, Organizer, Web-Designer), und habe auch einige Anwendungen in der integrierten Script-Sprache realisiert... Und deren, übrigens für alle oben aufgeführten Programmteile verfügbare, Info-Box ist (für mein Empfinden) ein einfach geniales Formatierungswerkzeug: Alt+Eingabe drücken, und schon hat man die für das im jeweiligen Programm benötigten Formatierungswerkzeuge zur Hand, unabhängig, ob es sich um Tabellen,Grafiken, Rahmen,Texte, Datenbanken undsoweiter handelt( siehe Anlage: Beispiel aus der Textverabeitung mit markiertem Rahmen). Das habe ich bisher noch bei keinem anderen Office-Programm gesehen, und ist nach einer kurzen Eingewöhnungszeit wirklich äußerst praktisch, wenn auch für klickwütige MS-Office-User sehr gewöhnungsbedürfig (nun genug der Häme). Leider hat sich dieses Feature nicht im Office-Bereich durchgesetzt (Excel wurde ja auch nur auf den Markt gebracht, damit MS beweisen konnte, die eigentliche PC-Killerapplikation Lotus 1-2-3 aus den 80ern zu toppen). Wäre eine Funktion analog der Info-Box in OO einzubauen? Da ich kein Entwickler bin, kann ich dazu nichts sagen. Die Entwickler lesen eher auf der englisch-sprachigen Liste dev@openoffice.org mit. Evtl. müßtest Du Dich dort einschreiben und Deine Idee äußern (und auf Feedback warten). p.s. Ich hätte große Lust, an der Dokumentaion des Open Office mitzuwirken, bin aber momentan zeitlich ziemlich begrenzt, um dessen Features zu testen, und sie beurteilen und beschreiben (dokumentieren) zu können. Es gibt bereits Teile von Dokumentationen (und natürlich die umfangreiche programmeigene Hilfe). Wenn Du übersetzen willst, findest Du Dokumente auf den Seiten von OOoauthors.org. Ansonsten schau einfach mal auf http://de.openoffice.org/doc/index.html, ob dort etwas fehlt, was Du beschreiben kannst und möchtest. Falls Du noch weitere Fragen zu Dokumentation hast, schreib' mich einfach noch einmal kurz an und hake nach. Schönes Wochenende Andreas -- ## Content Developer OpenOffice.org: lang/DE ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris ## http://de.openoffice.org ## Meine Seite http://www.amantke.de --- avast! Antivirus: Eingehende Nachricht sauber. Virus-Datenbank (VPS): 0638-1, 22.09.2006 Getestet um: 23.09.2006 09:44:43 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com ---End Message--- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Toolbar button's picture - problem
Hello! I have a toolbar button defined in GenericCommands.xcu to run macro:///OOoWikipedia.Module1.StartWithChooseBox. I definied Preoperties value to 1. Then I added it to the toolbar of Writer. Also I copied pictures for it to images.zip/rescommandimagelist as lc_ooowikipedia.module1.startwithchoosebox.png lch_ooowikipedia.module1.startwithchoosebox.png sc_ooowikipedia.module1.startwithchoosebox.png lsh_ooowikipedia.module1.startwithchoosebox.png The button appears on the toolbar and works as desired but it hasn't got picture. What is wrong? Thanks, KAMI - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Adding a biblio data file to the .odt file
It seems that the question of adding the bibliographic reference data file in to the save package (.odt fils) is very simple- The file you add must have a properly defined namespace declaration Mathias Bauer wrote It doesn't need to be a registered Mime type, it's just anything you like. You should use reversed domain notation to have your own namespace. So a usual media type would be org.myproject.myapplication.mytype or vnd.companyname.productname.type. OOo itself uses org.openoffice or in some places vnd.sun.star. If the file does not a valid namespace declaration it is not preserved. And the file needs to be defined in the /META-INF/manifest.xml file with a line like - manifest:file-entry manifest:media-type=text/xml manifest:full-path=biblio-data.rdf/ I tested this with Bruce's data.rdf file ( which has all the proper namespace declarations) from the CiteProc examples and it survives opening, changing and saving the file. Now we just need some code to access it ... David -- --- David N. Wilson Co-Project Lead for the Bibliographic OpenOffice Project http://bibliographic.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] OpenOffice port using USL C compiler on SCO OpenServer 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We are porting OpenOffice 2.0.3 to OpenServer 6 using the USL C compiler (UDK on SCO platforms). We're currently stuck in the bridges port and don't see how to run the bridges tests. Are there instructions on how to run these or any other useful information you can point us to ? Thanks in advance for any help, Ron Record [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFPQYRUVHIhAbn7DwRAkBWAJ9wCdiJpSoWTL7LMB9i5V+IKimqRwCeLsiD +DKn5HucDDXjDPTtrKH8inU= =JEuX -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
