On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:21 +0900, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
2008/9/5 Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have not yet seen all the warning in the dmake log file but first
1 lines of them are quite
interesting to look at. Just grep -i warning. Lots of.
We don't generally care about warnings in
Hello Eike,
Le 5 sept. 08 à 00:18, Eike Rathke a écrit :
Hi charles-h.schulz,
On Tuesday, 2008-09-02 15:39:18 +0200, charles-h.schulz wrote:
I finally completed the first step of Pinneberg, the work on future
versions of OpenOffice.org. Feel free to contribute here:
Hi all,
It seems that OOo 2.x uses agg ( 2.3 BSD license if I am not mistaken )
I've just checked Building OpenOffice.org 2.x (680er/300er series)
under Linux[1]
and found that OOo 2.x uses gpc[2], whose license i non-commercial.
the header of the
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:31:27PM +0900, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
It seems that OOo 2.x uses agg ( 2.3 BSD license if I am not mistaken )
Yeah, but that's disabled for ~all builds - at least the Linux
distros I know don't build it.
agg_conv_gpc.h doesn't use GPC's source code but it claimed to
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 16:27 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:31:27PM +0900, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
It seems that OOo 2.x uses agg ( 2.3 BSD license if I am not mistaken )
Yeah, but that's disabled for ~all builds - at least the Linux
distros I know don't build it.
I think I will not release 3.1 without i75026 getting fixed (Remove
dependency on GPC), since this is not opensource we need to remove it.
Martin
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:31:27PM +0900, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
It seems that OOo 2.x uses agg ( 2.3 BSD license if I
