Re: [dev] Trying to build and hack efficiently

2010-03-21 Thread eric b


Le 21 mars 10 à 01:45, Rémy Roy a écrit :


Hello,



Hello,

I'm quite new with developing Open Office, but what I want to do  
ultimatly is to solve issue 100709. I want to be able to quickly
build, run, test, modify the code and do it again so I can hack  
efficiently.






I'm using Ubuntu 9.10 with the DEV300 branch. I've having some  
troubles building with the PKGFORMAT=installed option. I can build
successfully but in the end my LOCALINSTALLDIR only contains an  
openoffice.org directory. It seems like it is missing the
openoffice.org3 directoy where I should be able to find the  
executables.




Did you try :

cd $ROOT_SRC/instsetoo_native

find . -name soffice

- if the build is correct, you should have the exact location of the  
script soffice to be run to launch OpenOffice.org



Please note that you can receive help this way :

install, an IRC client

join the #education.openoffice.org IRC channel ( server is  
irc.freenode.net )


ask directly : if somebody is present, you should receive help  ;-)



I've been checking what happens during the build process. Towards  
the ends of the build, I get an $LOCALINSTALLDIR_inprogress dir that
contains 2 directories: openoffice.org and openoffice.org3 which  
seems fine, but than in the last part of the build process, some  
script
kicks in and removes the openoffice.org3 directory. Have you got  
any clue as to why this is happening and how I can solve this?


I've been reading the various wiki pages for how to build this  
including the ErAck/Workflow but I cannot get this working right.


Any help will be apreciated. I'll also try to hang in
#dev.openoffice.org for a while.



Or try with #education.openoffice.org  ;-)
`

Regards,
Eric Bachard


--
qɔᴉɹə






Re: [dev] Trying to build and hack efficiently

2010-03-21 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:45:07 -0400
Rémy Roy remy...@remyroy.com wrote:

 I'm using Ubuntu 9.10 with the DEV300 branch. I've having some
 troubles building with the PKGFORMAT=installed option. I can build
 successfully but in the end my LOCALINSTALLDIR only contains an
 openoffice.org directory. It seems like it is missing the
 openoffice.org3 directoy where I should be able to find the
 executables.

Hi Rémy,

see http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=25968
Please consider opening an issue for that (if only for the fact
that then there will be a place to point people to). But I guess it wont
get high priority since you can either leave LOCALINSTALLDIR unset and
build directly into the output dir of instsetoo_native or you use
FORCE2ARCHIVE and untar the result to you preferred location.
Note that PKGFORMAT=installed has been removed from the Building
Guide exactly because of this weird behavior.

Best Regards,

Bjoern


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [dev] creating issues, looking for better practice

2010-03-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Terrence,

On Saturday, 2010-03-20 15:05:09 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:

 A couple of times lately [...] I have
 chosen a component arbitrarily when creating an issue.  What should I
 do to avoid wasting people's time?

You may use
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html#code_module
to submit issues on the level of code modules. For assertion reports
without a patch to attach please change the type of the generated issue
from PATCH to DEFECT.

Thanks
  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD


pgpZvvvGaBhpp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [dev] Windows' unopkg.exe does not differentiate between stderr and stdout, where does stdout go to when piping ?

2010-03-21 Thread Jan Holst Jensen

On 2010-03-20 19:37, rony wrote:

Hi Oliver,

On 20.03.2010 17:29, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
   

you can use: unopkg add myExtension.oxt--shared  --verbose --log-file 
c:\mylog.txt

but this won't log error's 
(http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79831),
output is:

## Progress log entry 2010-03-20 16:54:33 ##
Copying: myExtension.oxt
Enabling:myExtension
  Enabling: Addons.xcu
...

 

thank you very much for your hint!

Wondering whether unopkg.exe under Windows is exhibiting erroneous
behaviour (compared to its Linux behaviour) w.r.t. its output (cannot be
redirected, nor piped). And as such whether it warrants a bug report.


unopkg behaves rather strangely on Windows. There is no way to redirect 
its output in case of errors so you don't stand a chance of reporting an 
error back to a user - only that installation has failed. See also


http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102854

Cheers
-- Jan Holst Jensen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [dev] Trying to build and hack efficiently

2010-03-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Bjoern,

On Sunday, 2010-03-21 11:09:16 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:

 see http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=25968

So it was mere coincidence that at least up to m73 the
PKGFORMAT=installed LOCALINSTALLDIR approach worked for me as described
under
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:ErAck/WorkFlow#More_shell_variables

Added a caution note.

 Please consider opening an issue for that (if only for the fact
 that then there will be a place to point people to). But I guess it wont
 get high priority since you can either leave LOCALINSTALLDIR unset and
 build directly into the output dir of instsetoo_native or you use
 FORCE2ARCHIVE and untar the result to you preferred location.

Which is an extra step that could be avoided. I guess everyone wanting
that behavior will now setup an alias or script that after
a successfully completed build achieves that somehow..

  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD


pgpF3O99yeOBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [dev] why not add neural network to openoffice

2010-03-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi tangjiqiang,

On Sunday, 2010-03-21 08:41:36 +0800, tangjiqi...@redoffice.com wrote:

 i known some one  try to add neural network  to openoffice

Add it where, and for what purpose?

  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD


pgpL390ZmtvOv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [dev] creating issues, looking for better practice

2010-03-21 Thread Terrence Enger
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 18:06 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
 Hi Terrence,
 
 On Saturday, 2010-03-20 15:05:09 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
 
  A couple of times lately [...] I have
  chosen a component arbitrarily when creating an issue.  What should I
  do to avoid wasting people's time?
 
 You may use
 http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html#code_module
 to submit issues on the level of code modules. For assertion reports
 without a patch to attach please change the type of the generated issue
 from PATCH to DEFECT.

Thank you.  That looks like it should let me just pick a directory name
out of the line giving the source of the assertion.

Thanks,
Terry.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org