Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name unoinfo*
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
in Debian, is that what you mean?
Good that this script isn't documented
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 09:56, Rene Engelhard wrote:
... cut ...
rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name unoinfo*
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
in Debian, is that what you mean?
If yes, then it's interesting why Ubuntu
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote:
unoinfo java and interestingly unoil.jar is missing! Did a locate
unoil.jar after an updatedb, but it is not installed. So this is
Obviously totally untrue. I don't think Ubuntu removed unoil.jar, that
would break everything Java-ish.
Did
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:24 +0200
rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote:
[... lots of hostile ranting ignored ...]
And by the way, if you wanted to be constructive, why did you not
supply a link to the place for reporting it? If it was easy to find
such a place, I would have reported it
Hi Bjoern,
just saw your e-mail appear now in the list, hence the late answer.
Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :(
Regards,
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, rony wrote:
This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla
installation, after having gone further:
* Ubuntu 11.04 does *not* install any of the Java classes in
/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link/program/classes,
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :(
There IS NOTHING CRIPPELD. Just
Hi,
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:28:18 +0200
rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote:
This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla
installation
Which does not include a full libreoffice installation, as this is
unfortunately impossible to fit on the install CD along with the rest
of the
On 07.06.2011 12:53, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:52:41PM +0200, rony wrote:
If packages deviate from the reference packages (OOo or LO), they get
crippled, like it or not.
Nonsense. They just ha a bit other structure, the functionality is supposed
to be there. Just install the one package you miss.
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite
You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. You cripple XYZ. When
we don't. (And you say we do that intentionally, which is also a insult)
O.K., I take this one
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:28:53PM +0200, rony wrote:
On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite
You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. You cripple XYZ. When
we don't. (And you say we do that
Hi rony,
On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:55:44 +0200
rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote:
totally off the records for this list,
indeed.
but maybe nevertheless
interesting/amusing: Ubuntu 11.04 replaced OOo with LibreOffice (LO).
thats true.
Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with
Hi Bjoern,
On 06.06.2011 12:42, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with their OOo
installation in the past with the effect that using the Java interface from
the command line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) !
That has
14 matches
Mail list logo
