On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX shell is
enough)
And there is no /bin/bash (which would probably be a link to
/usr/local/bin/bash)? Just to be sure...
-Stephan
Hi Stephan
From: Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [dev] drop tcsh support?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:41:44 +0100
On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX
shell is enough)
And there is no /bin
On 01/11/10 20:17, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Regarding POSIX: I already did bash-builds with the POSIXLY_CORRECT
environment variable - no problem at all. (so /bin/sh could be used as
a fallback, possibly with an appropriate configure-warning-message)
My understanding is that bash posix mode
On 01/12/10 09:44, Maho NAKATA wrote:
On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX
shell is enough)
And there is no /bin/bash (which would probably be a link to
/usr/local/bin/bash)? Just to be sure...
No /bin/bash.
From: Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [dev] drop tcsh support?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:49:03 +0100
On 01/12/10 09:44, Maho NAKATA wrote:
On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX
shell is enough
Any objections against dropping support for using tcsh as the shell
invoked by dmake within the OOo code base? Then bash would be the only
remaining supported shell there, and some makefiles could be simplified
(including ones I am currently writing).
Note that this would not impact what
Two questions remain:
For one, the to-be-sourced scripts currently ensure that USE_SHELL's
path is in PATH, but I see no reason for that?
For another, are there any relevant configurations where bash is not at
/bin/bash?
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Stephan Bergmann
stephan.bergm...@sun.com wrote:
Any objections against dropping support for using tcsh as the shell invoked
by dmake within the OOo code base?
We had that discussion lately and the results were: No objections. At
least nobody did complain/wanted
