Re: [OSM-dev] Errors while svn up

2009-03-09 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:56:15PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: I think mod_evasive may be the problem, so I've disabled it for now. It has been on for a while now though so I'm not sure why it has started causing problems now. Maybe SVN content got large enough to exceed the hash table? From

Re: [osmosis-dev] Licence ...

2009-03-09 Thread marcus.wolschon
I don't care as long as I can still use it in my GPL3-software. Marcus ___ osmosis-dev mailing list osmosis-...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmosis-dev

Re: [osmosis-dev] Writeable Dataset Support

2009-03-09 Thread marcus.wolschon
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:25:59 +1100, Brett Henderson br...@bretth.com wrote: I've finished writeable dataset support. The DatasetReader class has been renamed to DatasetContext and now contains methods to get a NodeManager, WayManager and RelationManager. The existing getNode, etc methods

Re: [osmosis-dev] Writeable Dataset Support

2009-03-09 Thread Brett Henderson
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:25:59 +1100, Brett Henderson br...@bretth.com wrote: I've finished writeable dataset support. The DatasetReader class has been renamed to DatasetContext and now contains methods to get a NodeManager, WayManager and

Re: [osmosis-dev] Licence ...

2009-03-09 Thread Stefan Baebler
I consider my contributions so minor that i hereby give you all the power to relicense them as you please. Stefan /trying to shorten possibly never-ending license debate :) Brett Henderson wrote: I hate to bring this topic up because I don't know if I have the necessary patience for it :-)

Re: [OSM-dev] Errors while svn up

2009-03-09 Thread Chris Browet
I had the same issues as the initial reporter yesterday. Probably related: There is a mirror of Merkaartor on Launchpad. However, bazaar was unable to sync the branch from the OSM svn since nearly 6 months. Since Tom disabled mod_evasive (whatever it is), the sync happens again... - Chris - On

Re: [OSM-dev] API error 500 on /relation/*/full

2009-03-09 Thread Tom Hughes
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: I used to download relation from small to big size with a call like : $ wget http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/relation/8654/full Either from wget or from JOSM those requests now only get a 500 interval server error. Size might be the cause because it

Re: [OSM-dev] API error 500 on /relation/*/full

2009-03-09 Thread sly (sylvain letuffe)
Calm down... I'm not woried ;-) I am just checking the cause A 500 error nearly always just means the object is corrupt in some way. M Then it sounds an hurricane just pass over the database ;-) Those are almost randomly chosen relations from medium (~70 members) to huge size

Re: [OSM-dev] API error 500 on /relation/*/full

2009-03-09 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: None does download correctly. Most likely the 500 is there because the Rails script doesn't reply a valid content-type. Thus the error is not really passed through. Stefan ___ dev mailing list

Re: [OSM-dev] API error 500 on /relation/*/full

2009-03-09 Thread Tom Hughes
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: A 500 error nearly always just means the object is corrupt in some way. M Then it sounds an hurricane just pass over the database ;-) No, the problem is that the rails daemons are segving processing requests for a full relation, so they never get a

[OSM-dev] Updates to the rails port dev environment

2009-03-09 Thread Shaun McDonald
Hi devs, Update on changes in the osm server code. You now require to be using libxml-ruby 1.0.0 or later if you are using the latest rails_port head or the api06 branch. TomH has resynced the api06 branch to include the latest changes in head. This includes a new migration. To continue

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Maarten Deen
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, David Earl wrote: You have 3 ways to replace this: a) Press ESC instead of Shift b) Press U instead of Shift c) Double-Click to end drawing a node. Methods a and b are long-time and only c is new. These are all workable, but require extra clicks

Re: [josm-dev] [PATCH] timestamp parsedTimestamp in OsmPrimitive

2009-03-09 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Jiri Klement wrote: Calling functions twice is always bad design for multiple reasons. Use a temporary variable here. OK, I've fixed that. Way is calling functions twice bad design? Is OsmPrimitive supposed to be thread safe? Code will be changed later. When a variable

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread David Earl
On 09/03/2009 11:24, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, Stefan Breunig wrote: Try double clicking. Would we lose anything by simply reinstating the old shift behaviour? Indeed. AFAICS shift is unused now. Remember Habit gets built into the fingers, changing it arbitrarily is not a good thing to

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread David Earl
On 09/03/2009 11:34, David Earl wrote: On 09/03/2009 11:24, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, Stefan Breunig wrote: Try double clicking. Would we lose anything by simply reinstating the old shift behaviour? Indeed. AFAICS shift is unused now. Remember Oops, half finished paragraph. I was going to

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Stefan Breunig
create a node ready for extension when in open space, and select a node ready for extension when shift+click near a node. A normal click does just that. Pressing Shift was superfluous even before the change got checked in. -- Please encrypt your mail:

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread David Earl
On 09/03/2009 11:40, Stefan Breunig wrote: Would we lose anything by simply reinstating the old shift behaviour? Shift now prevents JOSM from re-using nodes, but still inserts nodes into existing ways. Old way to deal with this was to zoom in so the snap distance would be too large, then

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread David Earl
On 09/03/2009 11:42, Stefan Breunig wrote: create a node ready for extension when in open space, and select a node ready for extension when shift+click near a node. A normal click does just that. Pressing Shift was superfluous even before the change got checked in. There was a time when it

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread David Earl
On 09/03/2009 11:54, David Earl wrote: I don't really get what you're taking about with how you've switched SHIFT to something else. Can you illustrate it some how. My feeling from your description is that if you're nowt zoomed in far enough to distinguish things, you probably don't know

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: Stefan Breunig wrote: Try double clicking. Would we lose anything by simply reinstating the old shift behaviour? Well, I was not totally happy with that change, but I agreed with it. I would not have accepted such change if I would think previous

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Stefan Breunig
Ah, I see you found out yourself what shift does now :). Double clicking to end, or clicking last node again makes it especially easy for Potlatch switchers because that's how drawing is ended in Potlatch since like always. Also, there is a little indication of what will happen when you have a

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Maarten Deen
Shaun McDonald wrote: If you are zoomed in enough, you will find a little plus in the middle of the line. You simply need to drag that plus to get a new node. But then you drag the segment into a direction you don't want it to go. If you want the segment to be where it was you will have to

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Maarten Deen
Dirk Stöcker wrote: The remaining users will learn about that change and we have a better interface :-) Especially new users had lots of problems with the dangling rubber band which are now solved. I don't see that. When I click, I still get the rubber band. Maybe you mean something else,

Re: [josm-dev] [PATCH] timestamp parsedTimestamp in OsmPrimitive

2009-03-09 Thread Petr Nejedlý
Jiri Klement napsal(a): Hi, Attached patch replaces timestamp and parsedTimestamp in OsmPrimitive with DateContainer class accessible only using setter and getter. The patch is not much usefull on itself but hopefully its the first step to make OsmPrimitive encalupsed (without public

Re: [josm-dev] Add nodes functionality changed?

2009-03-09 Thread Stefan Breunig
I've just gone back through my mail, and I have nothing with your name on it about these changes, unless it is buried in something with an unrelated subject heading. They just appeared. I only updated Friday after a long period of using an older version in the mid 900s(*). Nah, I meant the

Re: [josm-dev] [BROKEN PATCH] Adding a Full Screen action to the View menu

2009-03-09 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: Would a patch that only enabled this feature under X11 be acceptable? Or perhaps some win32/OSX hacker can take a look at it. I've submitted one at http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/2279