http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1643
I've uploaded a patch for osmarender which support two new features:
1. preferedLanguages parameter. if preferedLanguages=:en,:de,,:he
osmarender will use the first of avaiable tags from:
name:en,name:de,name,name:he
name is just an
2009/3/11 Tal tal@gmail.com:
2. Support making one tag be exactly the same as another tag using the
following construct:
name:he=hebrew text
name=$(name:he)
This is not full variable expansion, just the ability for tag A to
say: i have exactly the same value as tag B.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
This will result in the very commonly used name=* tag becoming useless
for anyone that doesn't support this ad-hoc macro language once this
starts being entered into the database.
It will only be useless for
2009/3/11 Tal tal@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
This will result in the very commonly used name=* tag becoming useless
for anyone that doesn't support this ad-hoc macro language once this
starts being entered into the
2009/3/11 Tal tal@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk
wrote:
Don't encourage people to try to insert random crap in free form tags
such as name.
It is no more crap than your answer ;) It is an attempt to offer a
better solution to a serious
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tal tal@gmail.com wrote:
2. Support making one tag be exactly the same as another tag using the
following construct:
name:he=hebrew text
name=$(name:he)
This is not full variable expansion, just the ability for tag A to
say: i have
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
Yes. Yes we do.
What we don't do is mis-tag for the renderer. We don't tag
construction sites as landuse=allotments because we like the colour
mapnik uses to render allotments. We do however tag things with
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
Oh and I'll update my threat from the no-names thread of ages ago: if
you start doing this I'll make it my life's work to get on the local
council to name as many features as possible as $(name:fr) with an
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tal tal@gmail.com wrote:
2. Support making one tag be exactly the same as another tag using the
following construct:
name:he=hebrew text
name=$(name:he)
This is
Tal a scris:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tal tal@gmail.com wrote:
2. Support making one tag be exactly the same as another tag using the
following construct:
name:he=hebrew text
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Why? It would look exactly the same even if there are two overlaying nodes
in the middle.
The most common error i stumble upon is unconnected ways. Duplicate
nodes are rare in comparison. So visualizing connections more
prominently might reduce
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:03:31AM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Subject: Re: [josm-dev] Dropped arrows / visualize node connectivity
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Why? It would look exactly the same even if there are two overlaying nodes
in the middle.
The most common
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:41:55AM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
You can reduce the validator checks, when you select data before pressing
Validate. You know?
I know ;) At least this report i would not contribute to my lazyness,
ignorance or missing experience - Although i had other bug reports
13 matches
Mail list logo
