Re: [OSM-dev] broken utf8 in minute changeset 200907140650

2009-07-16 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Richard Fairhurst wrote: Don't bother, I hope to be committing the fix this evening. It's committed and live now - will be interested to hear if it fixes the issue for Linux FP users. cheers Richard -- View this message in context:

Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] Circular relation by user mapper_07

2009-07-16 Thread Chris Browet
2009/7/16 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Hi, Shaun McDonald wrote: Yes you can do it, though I don't have a good reason for doing such a thing. I don't have an idea where one would add a relation as a member to itself, but circular references could e.g. happen if you were to create a

Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] Circular relation by user mapper_07

2009-07-16 Thread Chris Browet
2009/7/16 Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Chris Browetc...@semperpax.com wrote: 2009/7/16 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Chris Browet wrote: I'd be curious to know how the api calculates the bounding box of such a relation

Re: [OSM-dev] broken utf8 in minute changeset 200907140650

2009-07-16 Thread Tom Hughes
On 16/07/09 11:55, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Roland Olbricht wrote: The letters Ä, Ö, Ü, ß don't work at all. When you say don't work at all, what happens? Do they vanish, or do the wrong characters stay around, or...? Your test app says, for Ä: Flash stores: c3 20 1e Server received: C3 83

Re: [OSM-dev] broken utf8 in minute changeset 200907140650

2009-07-16 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Tom Hughes wrote: Your test app says, for Ä: Flash stores: c3 20 1e Server received: C3 83 E2 80 9E Now Ä is 0xc4 in 8859-1 which encodes to UTF-8 as 0xc3 0x84 so something is going wrong at the first stage still. Right. 0x201E is Unicode for „ (double low-9 quotation mark). „ is 0x84

Re: [OSM-dev] broken utf8 in minute changeset 200907140650

2009-07-16 Thread Steve Hosgood
Steve Hosgood wrote: I'm getting better results. The only unicode characters needed for Welsh are the vowels with circumflexes. I've tested all those that occur (â, ô, w^, y^) and they all seem ok. Cursor works OK, deleting and backspacing seem right too. Thanks, Richard. I do notice a

[OSM-dev] Coastlines and water - contact and technical

2009-07-16 Thread Ben Supnik
Hi Y'all, First, does anyone know the ongoing status of the coastline error checker? The error check appears not to have run on newer data than May, and the wiki page indicates no contact since June. Does anyone know either what the status of the error checker is or who to contact about it?

Re: [OSM-dev] Coastlines and water - contact and technical

2009-07-16 Thread Lennard
Ben Supnik wrote: First, does anyone know the ongoing status of the coastline error checker? The error check appears not to have run on newer data than May, and the wiki page indicates no contact since June. Does anyone know either what the status of the error checker is or who to

[OSM-dev] What subset of UTF-8 should the API accept?

2009-07-16 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
The OSM protocol specifies that it accepts UTF-8 data, but in reality it only accepts the subset of UTF-8 that the XML parser being used doesn't barf on, see: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2009-July/016165.html This issue surfaces e.g. here:

Re: [OSM-dev] Coastlines and water - contact and technical

2009-07-16 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Lennard wrote: Second, a technical question: from what I read, Mapnik does not yet support multipolygons. Sure it does, just not every iteration of the 'advanced multipolygon' that's described on the wiki page. A basic 'area with holes in it' works just fine. Has the bug where

Re: [OSM-dev] Coastlines and water - contact and technical

2009-07-16 Thread Ben Supnik
Hi Lennard, Lennard wrote: The maintainer has been contacted weeks ago, but the server it ran on (hypercube) was then still down. I don't know the current status, and whether he has looked into it. Sure it does, just not every iteration of the 'advanced multipolygon' that's described on

Re: [OSM-dev] What subset of UTF-8 should the API accept?

2009-07-16 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmasonava...@gmail.com wrote: The OSM protocol specifies that it accepts UTF-8 data, but in reality it only accepts the subset of UTF-8 that the XML parser being used doesn't barf on, see:

Re: [OSM-dev] Coastlines and water - contact and technical

2009-07-16 Thread Lennard
Frederik Ramm wrote: Has the bug where osm2pgsql would break these in --slim mode (when adding updates) been fixed? I believe some of the issues have been fixed a little while ago, but I'll leave it to the osm2pgsql maintainers to give a definitive answer. -- Lennard

Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] Circular relation by user mapper_07

2009-07-16 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/7/16 Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com: 2009/7/16 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Chris Browet wrote: I'd be curious to know how the api calculates the bounding box of such a relation http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6#Bounding_box_computation assuming the api

Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] Circular relation by user mapper_07

2009-07-16 Thread Blars Blarson
In article 7ec79eed0907160140t2c1b9ffdmc64c27d7aca67...@mail.gmail.com c...@semperpax.com writes: I'd be curious to know how the api calculates the bounding box of such a relation, assuming the api definition is the smallest bbox containg all children bbox'es. Trapi handles this by keeping a hash

Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: [Geowanking] [Fwd: [Ann] LinkedGeoData.org]

2009-07-16 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/7/15 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com: From discussion about linkedgeodata.org/ on geowanking... From: Sean Gillies sean.gill...@gmail.com To: geowank...@geowanking.org I'm skeptical about RDF too, but the linked geodata folks are adding some extra value (at least for a particular

[OSM-dev] Rendering of long street names for short streets

2009-07-16 Thread Arne Goetje
Hi list, in Taiwan we have the situation, that street names may be too long to be rendered on the map. In addition, we'd like to keep the map bilingual (Chinese, Romanized/English), which makes the names rendered on the map even longer. How can we give the renderer some hints how to abbreviate

Re: [OSM-dev] Rendering of long street names for short streets

2009-07-16 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
I've actually been thinking of suggesting an :abbr suffix key to all name-accepting tags (name, name:en, name:fr, alt_name, int_name, etc.) and the values are a semicolon-separated list of abbreviations. This is backwards compatible since existing tools can still use the base name tags and ignore

Re: [OSM-dev] Rendering of long street names for short streets

2009-07-16 Thread Marcus Wolschon
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Eugene Alvin Villarsea...@gmail.com wrote: I've actually been thinking of suggesting an :abbr suffix key to all name-accepting tags (name, name:en, name:fr, alt_name, int_name, etc.) and the values are a semicolon-separated list of abbreviations. This is

Re: [josm-dev] Walking Papers Plugin

2009-07-16 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Frederik Ramm wrote: I have committed a new and rather experimental walking papers plugin. Mike Migurski has kindly added some parameters to the scan.php page so that the plugin should now be able to detect the range correctly. It is still a rough first draft and I'm sure many things can